Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-005055-36 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in participants with Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depemokimab | Experimental | Participants received a 100 milligram (mg) dose of depemokimab subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) standard of care (SOC) treatment throughout the study. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depemokimab (GSK3511294) | Biological | Depemokimab (GSK3511294) was administered using a pre-filled syringe. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps (NP) Score at Week 52 (Centrally Read) | Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores [0 to 4] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score Using Verbal Response Scale From Weeks 49 Through to Week 52 | This endpoint evaluated the change from baseline in the mean nasal obstruction score using a Verbal Response Scale (VRS) from Week 49 through to Week 52. Participants used a VRS to rate nasal obstruction severity, with scores averaged over the specified period to assess treatment impact on nasal obstruction symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Rhinorrhea (Runny Nose) Using Verbal Response Scale From Week 49 Through to Week 52 | Participants were asked to indicate the severity of rhinorrhea (runny nose) at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicated worst status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and change from baseline data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85724 | United States | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Gevaert P, Cornet M, Mullol J, De Corso E, Keles Turel N, Desrosiers M, et al. . ANCHOR-1/-2 primary data including pooled analysis ms. Lancet. PMID: 40037388 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00197-7 | ||
| 41461999 | Derived | Jackson DJ, Bourdin A, Blackorby A, Leslie A, Vichiendilokkul A, Howarth P, Karkoszka N, Fujieda S, Cornet M. Safety and Tolerability of Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Patients with Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Pooled Results from SWIFT-1/-2 and ANCHOR-1/-2. Adv Ther. 2026 Feb;43(2):880-897. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03457-4. Epub 2025 Dec 29. | |
| 40037388 |
Not provided
Not provided
Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents of the eligible studies via the Data Sharing Portal. Details on GSK's data sharing criteria can be found at: https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/innovation/trials/data-transparency/
Anonymized IPD will be made available within 6 months of publication of primary, key secondary and safety results for studies in product with approved indication(s) or terminated asset(s) across all indications.
Anonymized IPD is shared with researchers whose proposals are approved by an Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension may be granted, when justified, for up to 6 months.
A total of 264 participants were enrolled in the study.
A total of 264 participants were randomized to the study. Of which 257 participants were included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention excluding 7 participants from 2 sites with Good Clinical Practice (GCP)/data integrity issues.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Depemokimab | Participants received a 100 milligram (mg) dose of depemokimab subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) standard of care (SOC) treatment throughout the study. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 26, 2024 | Jul 9, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will receive either depemokimab (GSK3511294) or placebo during the study.
Not provided
Not provided
This will be a double-blind study.
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo was administered as normal saline using a pre-filled syringe. |
|
| Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Loss of Smell From Week 49 Through to Week 52 | Participants were asked to indicate the severity of loss of smell at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicates worse status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and change from baseline data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Lund Mackay (LMK) Computed Tomography (CT) Score at Week 52 | The LMK CT scoring system is based on CT imaging of the sinuses with points given for degree of opacification: 0 =normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. These points were applied to the maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, frontal sinus on each side (right and left). The osteomeatal complex (OC) is graded as 0 = not occluded, or 2 = occluded. The range for the total LMK CT score is therefore 0 (normal) to 24 (total opacification) when summed across both sides with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Total Score at Week 52 | Sino-nasal outcome test-22 is a 22-item measure of disease specific health related quality of life (HRQoL). Participants were asked to rate the severity of their condition on each of the 22 items over the previous 2 weeks using a 6-point rating scale of 0-5 including: 0 = Not present/no problem; 1 = Very mild problem; 2 = Mild or slight problem; 3 = Moderate problem; 4 = Severe problem; 5 = Problem as "bad as it can be". The scores for each question were summed up to derive the total score range for the SNOT-22 was from 0 (high quality of life) to 110 (worst quality of life), where higher scores indicate worse quality of life. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score From Week 21 Through to Week 24 | Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at its worst over the previous 24 hours using a 4-point VRS. The response options were no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms, scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicate more severe status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and change from baseline data are presented for Weeks 21-24. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 21 to Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps Score at Week 26 | Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores [0 to 4] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 26 |
| Percentage of Participants Requiring First Nasal Surgery (Actual or Entry on Waiting List) or Disease-Modulating Medication for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) Up to Week 52 | Nasal polyp surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue from the nasal cavity (for example polypectomy). Time to first nasal polyp surgery (actual or entry on waiting list) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP up to Week 52 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). The percentage of participants with nasal surgery or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Up to Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants Requiring First Nasal Surgery (Actual) or Disease-Modulating Medication for CRSwNP up to Week 52 | Nasal polyp surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue from the nasal cavity (for example polypectomy).Time to first nasal polyp surgery (actual) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP up to week 52 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). The percentage of participants with nasal surgery or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Up to Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants Requiring at Least One Course of Systemic Corticosteroids or Disease-Modulating Medication for CRSwNP or Nasal Surgery (Actual) During the Week 52 Treatment Period | The percentage of participants requiring at least 1 course of systemic corticosteroids or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP or nasal surgery (actual) during the Week 52 treatment period was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). Percentage of participants with nasal surgery or course of systemic CS for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | Up to Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) Score at Week 52 | The ACQ-5 is a five-item questionnaire designed to be self-completed by the participants to assess the most common asthma symptoms. The 5 questions enquired to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms (nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheezing). The overall ACQ-5 response option is the mean score of all 5 questions representing 0 with no impairment/limitation and 6 as total impairment/ limitation. Higher scores indicated more limitations and lower scores with better asthma control. Impact on asthma control in the subgroup of participants with an ACQ-5 score greater than 0.75 (indicating partially or not well-controlled) at baseline was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
| Roseville |
| California |
| 95661 |
| United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | New Haven | Connecticut | 06520 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hialeah | Florida | 33012 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 55446 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Columbia | Missouri | 65212 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73120 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fort Worth | Texas | 76109 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | McAllen | Texas | 78503 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | McKinney | Texas | 75070 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78258 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506-9200 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Changsha | 410013 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chengdu | 610041 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Guangzhou | 510000 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hangzhou | 310000 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nanjing | 210009 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200003 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200031 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Suzhou | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wuhan | 430060 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Xiamen | 361004 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Zhongshan | 528400 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Zibo Shandong Province | 255036 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bologna | 40139 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Catania | 95123 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | 20132 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Naples | 80131 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Padova | 35100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pisa | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Roma | 00128 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Roma | 00168 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rozzano MI | 20089 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Varese | 21100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Aichi | 471-8513 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chiba | 262-0015 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chiba | 272-0143 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gunma | 373-8585 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hyōgo | 650-0047 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hyōgo | 665-0827 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ibaraki | 309-1793 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 211-8533 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nagano | 395-8505 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shiga | 525-8585 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shizuoka | 420-0853 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tokyo | 142-8666 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | ?Od? | 90-153 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gdansk | 80-214 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Katowice | 40-611 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Krakow | 30-033 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Krakow | 31-513 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lubin | 59-300 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nadarzyn | 05-830 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Poznan | 60-355 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Strzelce Opolskie | 47-100 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Brasov | 500091 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Brasov | 500283 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bucharest | 014146 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bucharest | 014452 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cluj-Napoca | 400349 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Timișoara | 300643 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | 08022 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | 08041 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | 08907 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Jerez de la Frontera | 11407 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pamplona | 31008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santander | 39008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seville | 41009 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Valladolid | 47005 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Zaragoza | 50009 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gothenburg | SE-413 45 | Sweden |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lund | SE-221 85 | Sweden |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockholm | SE-114 86 | Sweden |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockholm | SE-171 76 | Sweden |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ankara | 06230 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| GSK Investigational Site | CapaIstanbul | 34093 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| GSK Investigational Site | Izmir | 35330 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tekirdağ | 59100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| Derived |
| Gevaert P, Desrosiers M, Cornet M, Mullol J, De Corso E, Keles Turel N, Maspero J, Fujieda S, Zhang L, Sousa AR, Woods SJ, Davis AM, Schalkwijk S, Edwards D, Ranganathan P, Follows R, Marshall C, Han JK; ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2 trial investigators. Efficacy and safety of twice per year depemokimab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2): phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel trials. Lancet. 2025 Mar 15;405(10482):911-926. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00197-7. Epub 2025 Mar 1. |
| FG001 |
| Placebo |
Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
| Full Analysis Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study intervention excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. Participants were analyzed according to the intervention they were allocated at randomization.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Depemokimab | Participants received a 100 mg dose of depemokimab SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | YEARS |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | "All Other Races" category (American Indian or Alaska Native and Black or African American where 0\ | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps (NP) Score at Week 52 (Centrally Read) | Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores [0 to 4] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites due to GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score Using Verbal Response Scale From Weeks 49 Through to Week 52 | This endpoint evaluated the change from baseline in the mean nasal obstruction score using a Verbal Response Scale (VRS) from Week 49 through to Week 52. Participants used a VRS to rate nasal obstruction severity, with scores averaged over the specified period to assess treatment impact on nasal obstruction symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Rhinorrhea (Runny Nose) Using Verbal Response Scale From Week 49 Through to Week 52 | Participants were asked to indicate the severity of rhinorrhea (runny nose) at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicated worst status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and change from baseline data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Loss of Smell From Week 49 Through to Week 52 | Participants were asked to indicate the severity of loss of smell at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicates worse status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and change from baseline data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Lund Mackay (LMK) Computed Tomography (CT) Score at Week 52 | The LMK CT scoring system is based on CT imaging of the sinuses with points given for degree of opacification: 0 =normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. These points were applied to the maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, frontal sinus on each side (right and left). The osteomeatal complex (OC) is graded as 0 = not occluded, or 2 = occluded. The range for the total LMK CT score is therefore 0 (normal) to 24 (total opacification) when summed across both sides with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Total Score at Week 52 | Sino-nasal outcome test-22 is a 22-item measure of disease specific health related quality of life (HRQoL). Participants were asked to rate the severity of their condition on each of the 22 items over the previous 2 weeks using a 6-point rating scale of 0-5 including: 0 = Not present/no problem; 1 = Very mild problem; 2 = Mild or slight problem; 3 = Moderate problem; 4 = Severe problem; 5 = Problem as "bad as it can be". The scores for each question were summed up to derive the total score range for the SNOT-22 was from 0 (high quality of life) to 110 (worst quality of life), where higher scores indicate worse quality of life. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score From Week 21 Through to Week 24 | Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at its worst over the previous 24 hours using a 4-point VRS. The response options were no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms, scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicate more severe status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and change from baseline data are presented for Weeks 21-24. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 21 to Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps Score at Week 26 | Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores [0 to 4] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | Full analysis set population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. The overall number of participants analyzed represents only those participants available at the specified time points and evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 26 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Requiring First Nasal Surgery (Actual or Entry on Waiting List) or Disease-Modulating Medication for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) Up to Week 52 | Nasal polyp surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue from the nasal cavity (for example polypectomy). Time to first nasal polyp surgery (actual or entry on waiting list) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP up to Week 52 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). The percentage of participants with nasal surgery or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | For pooled studies of 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523), the analysis was performed on the FAS population. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 1 site for 217095 and 2 sites for 218079 respectively with GCP violation. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they were allocated at randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Requiring First Nasal Surgery (Actual) or Disease-Modulating Medication for CRSwNP up to Week 52 | Nasal polyp surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue from the nasal cavity (for example polypectomy).Time to first nasal polyp surgery (actual) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP up to week 52 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). The percentage of participants with nasal surgery or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | For pooled studies of 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523), the analysis was performed on the FAS population. The FAS included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 1 site for 217095 and 2 sites for 218079 respectively with GCP violation. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they were allocated at randomization. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Up to Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Requiring at Least One Course of Systemic Corticosteroids or Disease-Modulating Medication for CRSwNP or Nasal Surgery (Actual) During the Week 52 Treatment Period | The percentage of participants requiring at least 1 course of systemic corticosteroids or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP or nasal surgery (actual) during the Week 52 treatment period was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). Percentage of participants with nasal surgery or course of systemic CS for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. | For pooled studies of 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523), the analysis was performed on the FAS population. The FAS included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 1 site for 217095 and 2 sites for 218079 respectively with GCP violation. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they were allocated at randomization. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Up to Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) Score at Week 52 | The ACQ-5 is a five-item questionnaire designed to be self-completed by the participants to assess the most common asthma symptoms. The 5 questions enquired to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms (nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheezing). The overall ACQ-5 response option is the mean score of all 5 questions representing 0 with no impairment/limitation and 6 as total impairment/ limitation. Higher scores indicated more limitations and lower scores with better asthma control. Impact on asthma control in the subgroup of participants with an ACQ-5 score greater than 0.75 (indicating partially or not well-controlled) at baseline was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value. | For pooled studies of 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523), the analysis was performed on the FAS population. The FAS included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug excluding participants from 1 site for 217095 and 2 sites for 218079 respectively with GCP violation. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they were allocated at randomization. The overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time points. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on scale | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 |
|
All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected from the start of the study intervention (Day 1) until follow up week 56.
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for the Safety Population which included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment excluding participants from 2 sites with GCP violation. AEs were reported treatment-wise.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Depemokimab | Participants received a 100 mg dose of depemokimab SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. | 0 | 129 | 6 | 129 | 75 | 129 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. | 0 | 128 | 10 | 128 | 78 | 128 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocarditis | Cardiac disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary dilatation | Hepatobiliary disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic sinusitis | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peri-implantitis | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sternal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular insufficiency | Nervous system disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureterolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Heavy menstrual bleeding | Reproductive system and breast disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal polyps | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal polyps | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | 27.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single site data do not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 | GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 15, 2024 | Jul 9, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009298 | Nasal Polyps |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009668 | Nose Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D011127 | Polyps |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| WHITE |
|
| ALL OTHER RACES |
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|
Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
|
|
|
Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
|
|
|
Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
|
|
|
Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|
Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52-weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Pooled Placebo | This reporting arm contains the pooled population of participants from the clinical trial groups "Placebo" study intervention from protocol 217095 and protocol 218079. Participants received a Placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26). Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Pooled Placebo |
This reporting arm contains the pooled population of participants from the clinical trial groups "Placebo" study intervention from protocol 217095 and protocol 218079. Participants received a Placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26). Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|
| Pooled Placebo |
This reporting arm contains the pooled population of participants from the clinical trial groups "Placebo" study intervention from protocol 217095 and protocol 218079. Participants received a Placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26). Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|
This reporting arm contains the pooled population of treated participants from the clinical trial groups "Depemokimab" study intervention from protocol 217095 and protocol 218079. Participants received a 100 mg dose of depemokimab SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26). Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
| OG001 | Pooled Placebo | This reporting arm contains the pooled population of participants from the clinical trial groups "Placebo" study intervention from protocol 217095 and protocol 218079. Participants received a Placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26). Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study. |
|
|
|