Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Medical Center Groningen | OTHER |
| Erasmus Medical Center | OTHER |
| UMC Utrecht | OTHER |
| Amsterdam University Medical Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale:
The optimal technique for removal of visible dysplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is safe, effective, easy to apply, and has been the most widely used technique since 2008. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a more controlled dissection method with potential improved efficacy, but at the cost of higher technical complexity.
Objective:
The investigators aim to compare EMR and ESD for removal of visible lesions in Barrett's esophagus.
Study design:
Randomized clinical trial
Study population:
Patients with Barrett's esophagus and a visible lesion with dysplasia and/or early cancer. Suspicion for submucosal invasion is an exclusion criterion.
Intervention:
Patients are randomized to receive either EMR or ESD, with follow-up and no ablation during 12 months after the resection.
Main study endpoint:
Primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with no evidence of residual or local recurrent neoplasia during 12 months follow-up after baseline.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic submucosal dissection | Active Comparator |
| |
| Endoscopic mucosal resection | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMR | Other | Endoscopic mucosal resection, according to standard care |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with no evidence of residual or local recurrent neoplasia during 12 months follow-up after baseline. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of complications | . Complications will be assessed on patient level (yes/no) and chi-square test will be used to compare the outcomes between the study arms. In the case > 25% of patients have multiple complications, assessment will be performed on complication level (n per patient) using Poisson-regression analysis. | 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam University Medical Center | Recruiting | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004938 | Esophageal Neoplasms |
| D001471 | Barrett Esophagus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven | OTHER |
Randomized study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ESD |
| Other |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection, according to standard care |
|
| Procedure times |
a skewed continuous variable that will be compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. |
| 12 months |
| Proportion of patients with endoscopically radical resection | assessed during the ER endoscopy, a proportion that will be compared using the chi2 test or Fisher's exact if the number of patients in a single category is <5. | 12 months |
| The total number of ER endoscopies per patient | This number will be compared using Poison regression analysis. | 12 months |
| The proportion of patients that shows neoplastic progression | This will be compared with a chi2 test or Fisher's exact if the number of patients in a single category is <5, and this analyses will be stratified for moment of detection (i.e. at baseline or later during the study duration). | 12 months |
| Cost-effectiveness | Cost-effectiveness will be calculated by efficacy of both procedures (absence of residual or recurrent disease) divided by total costs in Euro associated with the procedures | 12 months |
| Additional histopathologic evaluation may be performed to evaluate potential differences between the two techniques. | Interobserver agreement between the two techniques will be evaluated with Cohen's kappa, as well as a subjective score on ease of assessment on a NRS score ranging from 0-10. | 12 months |
| Catharina Ziekenhuis | Recruiting | Eindhoven | Netherlands |
|
| University Medical Center Groningen | Recruiting | Groningen | Netherlands |
|
| St. Antonius Ziekenhuis | Recruiting | Nieuwegein | Netherlands |
|
| Erasmus Medical Center | Recruiting | Rotterdam | Netherlands |
|
| University Medical Center Utrecht | Recruiting | Utrecht | Netherlands |
|
| D006258 |
| Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D011230 | Precancerous Conditions |