Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A comparison between IPACK block and adductor canal block in post operative pain management
Two groups of patients between 40 and 60 yrs who are undergoing open wedge high tibeal osteotomy Group 1 will receive IPACK block with 15 ml Bupivacaine, immediately before spinal anaesthesia .
Group 2 will receive adductor canal block ,also with 15 ml Bupivacaine. before spinal anaesthesia. register the time of first pain sensation and firs IV analgesic dose required in each group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 who will receive IPACK block | Active Comparator | This group of patients will receive IPACK block immediately before spinal anaesthesia then follow up for 24 hrs to register first pain sensation and analgesic requirements |
|
| Group 2 who will receive adductor canal block | Active Comparator | This group of patients will receive adductor canal block immediately before spinal anaesthesia then follow up for 24 hrs to register first pain sensation and analgesic requirements |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infiltration of local anaesthetic between popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule | Procedure | Adductor canal block (ACB) is a popular peripheral nerve block that has been shown to decrease pain significantly and thereby opioid consumption with minimal effect on quadriceps function [8]. Though ACB provides analgesia to the peripatellar and intra-articular aspect of knee joint, it does not relieve posterior knee pain which is moderate to severe in intensity [9, 10]. The recent technique of an ultrasound (US)-guided local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (IPACK) has shown to provide significant posterior knee analgesia without affecting the common peroneal nerve (CPN) [11]. We postulated that IPACK will provide better pain relief and improve knee function in the immediate postoperative period compared to ACB |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| the time of first pain sensation requiring analgesia | If intervention which is adductor canal block or lPACK block is effective in postoperative pain control that can decrease the lV analgesic agents | 24 hours |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salwa Hussein | Contact | 01159460234 | salwa94hussien@gmail.com | |
| Abd elraheem Mahmoud | Contact | 01000032655 | arawamyyy@yahoo.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Salwa Hussein, Lecturer | Assiut University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
Not provided
Not provided
Two groups of people who are undergoing open wedge high tibeal osteotomy aged between 40 and 60 yrs old not diabetic and neurologically free
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |