Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There is a shallow learning curve with TELD (transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy). The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of TELD assisted by electromagnetic navigation for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | group A undergoing TELD (transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy) with electromagnetic navigation system |
| |
| Group B | group B undergoing TELD with X-ray fluoroscopy (gold standard) |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electromagnetic navigation system | Procedure | The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of TELD assisted by electromagnetic navigation for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | 0% to 20%: minimal disability: The patient can cope with most living activities. Usually no treatment is indicated apart from advice on lifting sitting and exercise. 21%-40%: moderate disability: The patient experiences more pain and difficulty with sitting, lifting and standing. Travel and social life are more difficult and they may be disabled from work. Personal care, sexual activity and sleeping are not grossly affected and the patient can usually be managed by conservative means. 41%-60%: severe disability: Pain remains the main problem in this group but activities of daily living are affected. These patients require a detailed investigation. 61%-80%: crippled: Back pain impinges on all aspects of the patient's life. Positive intervention is required. 81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms. | Preoperatively. 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively |
| Change in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) | This is a 24 item questionnaire. The patient is asked to tick a statement when it applies to him that specific day, this makes it possible to follow changes in time. The end score is the sum of the ticked boxes. The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (max. disability) | Preoperatively. 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Back Pain Numerical Rating Score (BPNRS) | Patient is asked to rate his pain between 11 points (0-11; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable) | Preoperatively. 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively |
| Leg Pain Numerical Rating Score (LPNRS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
20 consecutive patients, group A undergoing TELD with electromagnetic navigation system vs. group B undergoing TELD with X-ray fluoroscopy (gold standard). Parameters: gender, age, body mass index, neurological examination, comorbidities (diabetes, AHT, depression, smoking, work status, other joint problems), recurrence of disc herniation, follow-up time, pain evaluation on the day before surgery (numerical rating scale), herniation level, type of herniation (disc protrusion, disc prolapsed, disc extrusion or sequestered disc), duration of preoperative back pain/leg pain, use of analgesics (type and duration), preoperative Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, preoperative Oswestry Disability Index.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007405 | Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D006547 | Hernia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patient is asked to rate his pain between 11 points (0-11; 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable) |
| Preoperatively. 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively |
| Modified MacNab Criteria | Patient is asked about his well being and has to choose between: Excellent: No pain, No restriction of mobility, Return to normal work and level of activity Good: Occasional nonradicular pain, Relief of presenting symptoms, Able to return to modified work Fair: Some improved functional capacity, Still handicapped and/or unemployed Poor: Continued objective symptoms of root involvement, Additional operative intervention needed at index level irrespective of length of postoperative follow-up | Preoperatively. 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-operatively |
| D020763 |
| Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |