Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Neurotherapeutics Ltd | UNKNOWN |
| University of Nottingham | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD) are neurodevelopmental disorders that impact approximately 1% of 5-18 year olds worldwide. Both TS and CTD are characterised by the presence of tics, which are repetitive, purposeless, movements or vocalisations of short duration which can occur many times throughout a day. Tics can have a significant negative impact on daily functioning and quality of life, hence, many seek out approaches to manage and reduce their tics and the urges people with TS or CTD often feel preceding them. The two main evidence-based approaches to treating tics are behavioural therapies and medication; both of which can be effective, but accessibility and waitlists are often an issue for behavioural therapies and side effects are common with medication use. Consequently, there is an urgent need for the development of alternative, safe and accessible treatments.
This study aims to examine the effects of rhythmic pulses of electrical stimulation delivered to the wrist in treating tics in people with TS and CTD. In recent work, the investigators have shown that this type of electrical stimulation known as median nerve stimulation (MNS), can substantially reduce tics and related urges during stimulation. The investigators now want to extend this work to examine the effects of the stimulation on a higher number of people, compared to placebo and treatment as usual. The investigators will do this through assessment of symptom change using questionnaires, interviews and videos collection during four weeks of stimulation and two time points afterwards.
The investigators have developed a new MNS device for this trial which is portable and easy to use. The primary hypothesis is that active rhythmic MNS will lead to a reduction in tic severity compared to a placebo condition. The secondary hypothesis is that MNS will also have a positive beneficial effect on urges, impairment, well-being and co-occurring Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) symptoms compared to both sham stimulation and no stimulation.
The symptoms of Tourette Syndrome (TS) (tics and premonitory urges) can be treated using behavioural therapies and/or medications, however access, availability, side effects and treatment resistance are factors which many people with TS and their family's express frustration with. Therefore, it is in the interest of patients and the wider medical community that alternative treatments are tested and scientifically validated. In recent work, the investigators have found that low intensity electrical stimulation delivered to the wrist can be effective in significantly reducing tics and tic related premonitory urges. In the study the investigators want to expand this work to examine the effects of the stimulation on a higher number of people, compared to placebo and treatment as usual and to examine the suitability of a wearable device for delivering stimulation from home.
The investigators will conduct a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a wearable, wrist-worn, therapeutic device for the suppression of premonitory urge and the reduction of tics in individuals with TS. In order to validate the device as a genuine and effective form of therapy, it is essential that a placebo branch of the study is completed. Participants will be made aware of the three different experimental arms ahead of enrolment and will be debriefed following completion of the trial. The investigators are committed to clearly explaining why a placebo condition is essential, while minimising the amount of information the investigators withhold from participants, hence the investigators feel it is important to be able to let participants know the condition participants were in at the end of the trial.
The device the investigators are aiming to trial will be programmed to deliver low-intensity (1-19 mA) rhythmic (10Hz) trains of electrical stimulation to the median nerve for 14 minutes, and will be used by each participant from home once each day, 5 days each week, for a period of 4 weeks. Participants assigned to the active condition will experience rhythmic (10Hz) trains of stimulation set to an individual intensity which the investigators have found to be effective in the investigators' previous work (-120% of intensity needed to generate a visible muscle twitch in the thenar muscle). Those assigned to the placebo group will receive stimulation at a subthreshold rate (50% intensity needed to generate thenar muscle twitch). The investigators' previous work suggests that this serves as a sufficient control condition. Those in the waitlist group would receive treatment as normal, prior to an open label phase of receiving active stimulation.
A total of 135 participants (45 per group) will be allocated to one of the three groups; active stimulation; sham stimulation; or waitlist (i.e., treatment as usual). In order to minimise the difference in age, gender and symptom severity between groups, the investigators will perform a stratified randomisation for age, gender and severity (using Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) Total Tic Severity Score) to allocate individuals to each group.
The effects of the stimulation will be assessed using several semi-structured interviews, questionnaire measures and video recordings of participant's tics. The investigators will also use questionnaire measures/ interviews to measure baseline characteristics of the participants, as these factors may influence response to the investigators proposed intervention. The majority of this trial will be remotely supervised and therefor the majority of these measures will also be taken through video call and online questionnaire measures with the exception of an initial visit to the University of Nottingham.
The primary hypothesis is that active MNS will lead to a reduction in tic severity compared to subthreshold placebo stimulation. The procedure for testing this will be as follows:
The investigators estimate that the trial will take 9 months to collect all data sets, including the 6 month follow up period. Visits to Nottingham will take place during the first 3 months of the trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active stimulation | Experimental |
| |
| Sham stimulation | Sham Comparator |
| |
| Waitlist (no stimulation) | No Intervention | Treatment as usual. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active stimulation | Device | Participants assigned to the active stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 120% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - Revised (YGTSS-R) Total Tic Severity Score | The primary outcome measure were the scores from our core measures of tic severity (using scores from YGTSS-R). The YGTSS-R total tic severity score ranges from 0-50, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. These were used to assess any change in tic severity symptoms between groups and over the initial 4 week stimulation period. YGTSS-R is recognised as the gold standard measure for evaluating tic severity in Tourette syndrome. | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Tic Frequency as Quantified by Analysis of Video Data | This outcome measure explored the changes in tic frequency occurring during stimulation and 5-min period immediately prior to stimulation, through the use of video data in a subgroup of participants. Video data analyses are based on 82 video sessions from 16 participants receiving active stimulation and 91 video sessions from 17 participants receiving sham stimulation. For each session, the change in tic frequency was calculated by subtracting tics per minute (TPM) in the period during stimulation with TPM measured during the 5-min period immediately prior to stimulation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quality of Life (as Measured by Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (GTS-QoL)) | This outcome measure will evaluate the treatment effects of MNS on well-being by looking at change in scores from the GTS-QoL. The GTS-QoL scores range from 0-100, where higher scores indicate worse outcome. This questionnaire includes a visual analog scale ranging 0-100 assessing how satisfied the person feels in their life, higher scores indicating a better outcome. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sir Colin Campbell Building | Nottingham | Nottinghamshire | NG7 2TU | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24001701 | Background | Jeon S, Walkup JT, Woods DW, Peterson A, Piacentini J, Wilhelm S, Katsovich L, McGuire JF, Dziura J, Scahill L. Detecting a clinically meaningful change in tic severity in Tourette syndrome: a comparison of three methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 31. | |
| 19913651 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 210 potential participants consented to participate in the screening interview. However, 25 participants did not proceed to attend the interview, and 19 participants were subsequently excluded after their suitability to participate in the trial was assessed. Additionally, 23 participants were excluded before the baseline visit, and an additional 10 participants were excluded during the baseline visit. Thus, 133 participants were enrolled in the trial and randomised.
Recruited participants were individuals who contacted us directly expressing an interest in taking part in this research following media coverage about this and following the advertisement of the clinical trial on social media by the UK charity Tourette's Action.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active Stimulation | Active stimulation: Participants assigned to the active stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 120% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| FG001 | Sham Stimulation | Sham stimulation: Participants assigned to the sham stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 50% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| FG002 | Waitlist (no Stimulation) | Treatment as usual |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Baseline population excludes enrolled participants who were withdrawn before the week1 assessments
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active Stimulation | Active stimulation: Participants assigned to the active stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 120% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - Revised (YGTSS-R) Total Tic Severity Score | The primary outcome measure were the scores from our core measures of tic severity (using scores from YGTSS-R). The YGTSS-R total tic severity score ranges from 0-50, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. These were used to assess any change in tic severity symptoms between groups and over the initial 4 week stimulation period. YGTSS-R is recognised as the gold standard measure for evaluating tic severity in Tourette syndrome. | Participants were removed from further analysis if they exhibited a YGTSS-TTSS at baseline (week 0) below the inclusion threshold (i.e., a YGTSS-TTSS of 15 or lower) or if there was missing data for week 4. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
|
Adverse event data were collected from each participant from the date the participant was enrolled in the study until their withdrawal or the conclusion of their 6-month follow-up.
Participants were encouraged to report any experiences of adverse events to a researcher immediately. Occurrence of adverse events was also checked during the weekly video calls between researchers and participants during the 4 week home use phase of the trial and at follow up video calls.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active Stimulation | Active stimulation: Participants assigned to the active stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 120% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tic attack | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Participant experienced a tic attack in school, which involved being vacant at first with eyeblink and neck tics, then went unresponsive for 40min. Participant had not yet used the investigative device. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrodes in contact with skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Device electrodes make direct contact with skin during the stimulation session due to gel pads slippage |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Stephen Jackson | University of Nottingham | 0115 84 66020 | stephen.jackson@nottingham.ac.uk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 12, 2023 | Dec 12, 2023 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005879 | Tourette Syndrome |
| D013981 | Tic Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups (ratio: 1:1:1): active stimulation, sham stimulation and waitlist (no stimulation).
Those in the waitlist group would receive treatment as normal, prior to an open label phase of receiving active stimulation.
Not provided
Not provided
The member of the research team performing allocation will not be involved in the collection or processing of measurement outcomes (questionnaire/ video data). This same researcher will also be responsible for assigning participants to interventions by programming the MNS devices to deliver sham/active stimulation. This member of the research team will be responsible for creating and maintaining a document which links each participants unique ID with the condition they have been assigned to.
All other members of the research team, participants and legal guardians will be blind to sham/active group allocation. Participants in the waitlist group and their carers will not be blind to the group they have been allocated to. Participants allocated to the waitlist group will not be blind to the stimulation type they will receive (i.e., all participants initially allocated to the waitlist group will go on to receive active rhythmic MNS at the conclusion of their participation).
|
| Sham stimulation | Device | Participants assigned to the sham stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 50% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
|
| Pre-stimulation period and During stimulation period |
| Change in Premonitory Urge (as Measured by Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale-Revised (PUTS-R)) | This outcome measure will evaluate the treatment effects of MNS on the frequency of the urge to tic by looking at change in scores from the PUTS-R. The PUTS-R is a 24 item self-report instrument which is specifically designed to measure the current frequency of different types of premonitory urges in patients with tic disorders. The PUTS-R scores range from 0-32, where higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
| Change in Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (as Measured by (Children's) Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (C)Y-BOCS) | This outcome measure will evaluate the treatment effects of MNS on OCD symptoms by looking at change in scores from the (C)Y-BOCS. The age-appropriate version of this semi-structured interview was used to assess symptoms of OCD. The first part of the scale involves assessing what potential obsessions/compulsions an individual has experienced over the course of the past week, followed by assessment of the time spent, interference and distress caused by, ability to resist and control over obsessions compulsions. The (C)Y-BOCS scores range from 0-40, where higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
| Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
| Robertson MM, Eapen V, Cavanna AE. The international prevalence, epidemiology, and clinical phenomenology of Tourette syndrome: a cross-cultural perspective. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Dec;67(6):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.07.010. |
| 23206664 | Background | Cohen SC, Leckman JF, Bloch MH. Clinical assessment of Tourette syndrome and tic disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jul;37(6):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Dec 1. |
| 28121259 | Background | Cavanna AE, Black KJ, Hallett M, Voon V. Neurobiology of the Premonitory Urge in Tourette's Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Treatment Implications. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Spring;29(2):95-104. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16070141. Epub 2017 Jan 25. |
| 8417589 | Background | Leckman JF, Walker DE, Cohen DJ. Premonitory urges in Tourette's syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;150(1):98-102. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.1.98. |
| 10972415 | Background | Freeman RD, Fast DK, Burd L, Kerbeshian J, Robertson MM, Sandor P. An international perspective on Tourette syndrome: selected findings from 3,500 individuals in 22 countries. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Jul;42(7):436-47. doi: 10.1017/s0012162200000839. |
| 21046225 | Background | Conelea CA, Woods DW, Zinner SH, Budman C, Murphy T, Scahill LD, Compton SN, Walkup J. Exploring the impact of chronic tic disorders on youth: results from the Tourette Syndrome Impact Survey. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011 Apr;42(2):219-42. doi: 10.1007/s10578-010-0211-4. |
| 22052430 | Background | Conelea CA, Woods DW, Zinner SH, Budman CL, Murphy TK, Scahill LD, Compton SN, Walkup JT. The impact of Tourette Syndrome in adults: results from the Tourette Syndrome impact survey. Community Ment Health J. 2013 Feb;49(1):110-20. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9465-y. Epub 2011 Nov 4. |
| 16938513 | Background | Robertson MM. Mood disorders and Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome: An update on prevalence, etiology, comorbidity, clinical associations, and implications. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Sep;61(3):349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.07.019. |
| 27773353 | Background | Fernandez de la Cruz L, Rydell M, Runeson B, Brander G, Ruck C, D'Onofrio BM, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, Mataix-Cols D. Suicide in Tourette's and Chronic Tic Disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 15;82(2):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Aug 26. |
| 27132945 | Background | Whittington C, Pennant M, Kendall T, Glazebrook C, Trayner P, Groom M, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson G, Jackson S, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J, Hollis C. Practitioner Review: Treatments for Tourette syndrome in children and young people - a systematic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;57(9):988-1004. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12556. Epub 2016 May 2. |
| 21445724 | Background | Roessner V, Plessen KJ, Rothenberger A, Ludolph AG, Rizzo R, Skov L, Strand G, Stern JS, Termine C, Hoekstra PJ; ESSTS Guidelines Group. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part II: pharmacological treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;20(4):173-96. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0163-7. |
| 26786936 | Background | Hollis C, Pennant M, Cuenca J, Glazebrook C, Kendall T, Whittington C, Stockton S, Larsson L, Bunton P, Dobson S, Groom M, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson GM, Jackson S, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J. Clinical effectiveness and patient perspectives of different treatment strategies for tics in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and qualitative analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jan;20(4):1-450, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta20040. |
| 4777653 | Background | Azrin NH, Nunn RG. Habit-reversal: a method of eliminating nervous habits and tics. Behav Res Ther. 1973 Nov;11(4):619-28. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(73)90119-8. No abstract available. |
| 20483969 | Background | Piacentini J, Woods DW, Scahill L, Wilhelm S, Peterson AL, Chang S, Ginsburg GS, Deckersbach T, Dziura J, Levi-Pearl S, Walkup JT. Behavior therapy for children with Tourette disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1929-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.607. |
| 25879205 | Background | Cuenca J, Glazebrook C, Kendall T, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson G, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J, Trayner P, Hollis C. Perceptions of treatment for tics among young people with Tourette syndrome and their parents: a mixed methods study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 11;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0430-0. |
| 29885862 | Background | Hsu CW, Wang LJ, Lin PY. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):1110-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 5. |
| 32289698 | Background | Charvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Knotkova H. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10. |
| 32710772 | Background | Fregni F, El-Hagrassy MM, Pacheco-Barrios K, Carvalho S, Leite J, Simis M, Brunelin J, Nakamura-Palacios EM, Marangolo P, Venkatasubramanian G, San-Juan D, Caumo W, Bikson M, Brunoni AR; Neuromodulation Center Working Group. Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Apr 21;24(4):256-313. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051. |
| 32502412 | Background | Morera Maiquez B, Sigurdsson HP, Dyke K, Clarke E, McGrath P, Pasche M, Rajendran A, Jackson GM, Jackson SR. Entraining Movement-Related Brain Oscillations to Suppress Tics in Tourette Syndrome. Curr Biol. 2020 Jun 22;30(12):2334-2342.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.044. Epub 2020 Jun 4. |
| 35158022 | Background | Houlgreave MS, Morera Maiquez B, Brookes MJ, Jackson SR. The oscillatory effects of rhythmic median nerve stimulation. Neuroimage. 2022 May 1;251:118990. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118990. Epub 2022 Feb 11. |
| 30618939 | Background | Armstrong S, Sale MV, Cunnington R. Neural Oscillations and the Initiation of Voluntary Movement. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02509. eCollection 2018. |
| 25535056 | Background | Debes N, Jeppesen S, Raghava JM, Groth C, Rostrup E, Skov L. Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Analysis of the Developmental Changes of Tourette Syndrome Reveal Reduced Diffusion in the Cortico-Striato-Thalamo-Cortical Pathways. J Child Neurol. 2015 Sep;30(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/0883073814560629. Epub 2014 Dec 22. |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Technical difficulties with device |
|
| Not committed to the trial |
|
| Sham Stimulation |
Sham stimulation: Participants assigned to the sham stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 50% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| BG002 | Waitlist (no Stimulation) | Treatment as usual |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Tic severity | Tic severity was measured with the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale - revised (YGTSS-R) - Total Tic Severity score | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| OG001 | Sham Stimulation | Sham stimulation: Participants assigned to the sham stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 50% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. |
| OG002 | Waitlist | Treatment as usual (no stimulation) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Tic Frequency as Quantified by Analysis of Video Data | This outcome measure explored the changes in tic frequency occurring during stimulation and 5-min period immediately prior to stimulation, through the use of video data in a subgroup of participants. Video data analyses are based on 82 video sessions from 16 participants receiving active stimulation and 91 video sessions from 17 participants receiving sham stimulation. For each session, the change in tic frequency was calculated by subtracting tics per minute (TPM) in the period during stimulation with TPM measured during the 5-min period immediately prior to stimulation. | A random sub-group of participants in the Active and Sham groups undertook daily video recordings during the first 2 weeks of stimulation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Tics per minute | Pre-stimulation period and During stimulation period | Video sessions | Video sessions |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Premonitory Urge (as Measured by Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale-Revised (PUTS-R)) | This outcome measure will evaluate the treatment effects of MNS on the frequency of the urge to tic by looking at change in scores from the PUTS-R. The PUTS-R is a 24 item self-report instrument which is specifically designed to measure the current frequency of different types of premonitory urges in patients with tic disorders. The PUTS-R scores range from 0-32, where higher scores indicate worse outcome. | The number of participants are from a cut-off of a score of 12 in the PUTS at baseline. | Posted | Nov 2024 | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) (as Measured by (Children's) Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (C)Y-BOCS) | This outcome measure will evaluate the treatment effects of MNS on OCD symptoms by looking at change in scores from the (C)Y-BOCS. The age-appropriate version of this semi-structured interview was used to assess symptoms of OCD. The first part of the scale involves assessing what potential obsessions/compulsions an individual has experienced over the course of the past week, followed by assessment of the time spent, interference and distress caused by, ability to resist and control over obsessions compulsions. The (C)Y-BOCS scores range from 0-40, where higher scores indicate worse outcome. | The number of participants are from a cut-off of a score of 16 in the (C)-YBOCS at baseline. | Posted | Feb 2026 | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Quality of Life (as Measured by Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (GTS-QoL)) | This outcome measure will evaluate the treatment effects of MNS on well-being by looking at change in scores from the GTS-QoL. The GTS-QoL scores range from 0-100, where higher scores indicate worse outcome. This questionnaire includes a visual analog scale ranging 0-100 assessing how satisfied the person feels in their life, higher scores indicating a better outcome. | Participants were removed from further analysis if there was missing data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline and week 4 after starting stimulation |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 44 |
| 0 |
| 44 |
| 8 |
| 44 |
| EG001 | Sham Stimulation | Sham stimulation: Participants assigned to the sham stimulation arm will receive rhythmic MNS 2 minutes on and 1 minute off for 15 minutes. The strength of the stimulation will be set to 50% the intensity needed to produce a visible contraction within the thenar muscle. | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | 4 | 44 |
| EG002 | Waitlist (no Stimulation) | Treatment as usual | 0 | 45 | 1 | 45 | 0 | 45 |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D020271 | Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| Male |
|
A priori threshold for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05 |
| Superiority |
| t-test, 2 sided | < 0.04 | A priori threshold for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05 | Superiority |
A priori threshold for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05 |
| Superiority |
| t-test, 2 sided | 0.06 | A priori threshold for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05 | Superiority |
|
We calculated individual difference scores by subtracting each individual's Quality of Life (QoL) score measured at baseline from their score measured at the end of the 4-week stimulation period (i.e. week 4). To assess within-group differences in changes in QoL, we used a one-sided t-test between baseline and week4 scores. |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| 0.0005 |
A priori threshold for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05. |
| Superiority |
| We calculated individual difference scores by subtracting each individual's Quality of Life (QoL) score measured at baseline from their score measured at the end of the 4-week stimulation period (i.e. week 4). To assess within-group differences in changes in QoL, we used a one-sided t-test between baseline and week4 scores. | t-test, 2 sided | 0.13 | A priori threshold for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05. | Superiority |