Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the dosing interval, optimal dose, evaluate safety, and efficacy of AYP-101 S.C injection for the reduction of Submental Fat (SMF).
This study is to determine the dosing interval, optimal dose, evaluate safety and efficacy of AYP-101 S.C injection for the reduction of SMF who wish improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe convexity or fullness associated with SMF in adults.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| AYP-101 1 | Experimental | 0.2 mL injections, 1.0 cm apart, up to 10.0 ml per treatment session at intervals of approximately 2 weeks for up to a maximum of 6 treatments. |
|
| AYP-101 2 | Experimental | 0.2 mL injections, 1.0 cm apart, up to 10.0 ml per treatment session at intervals of approximately 2 weeks for up to a maximum of 6 treatments. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | 0.2 mL injections, 1.0 cm apart, up to 10.0 ml per treatment session at intervals of approximately 2 weeks for up to a maximum of 6 treatments. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyene Phosphatidylcholine | Drug | Formulated as an injectable solution containing Polyene Phosphatidylcholine at two concentration of 25 mg/mL and 50 mg/mL. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of subjects who improved at least 1 grade in both Evaluator-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (ER-SMFRS) and Subject-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS) | Submental Fat Rating Scale is scored on a 5-point scale with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of subjects who improved at least 1 grade in both Evaluator-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (ER-SMFRS) and Subject-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (SR-SMFRS) | Submental Fat Rating Scale is scored on a 5-point scale with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. | 12 weeks after the final treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male and female over 19 and under 65 years old
Localized submental fat under chin area and who meet all the following criteria.
â‘ Determined as grade 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) on both using the CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS at visit 1
â‘¡ Determined as grade 2 (less satisfied) or less by oneself, using the SSRS at visit 1
Stable weight over the last 6 months (body weight change within +/-10%), subject who should refrain from exercise and diet that may affect the study results, and who agreed to remain it for the study period
Singed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chung Ang University Hospital | Seoul | 06973 | South Korea |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008224 | Lymphoma, Follicular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C029449 | polyene phosphatidylcholine |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | Phosphate buffered saline placebo for injection |
|
| Percentage of subjects who improved at least 1 grade of Evaluator-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (ER-SMFRS) |
Submental Fat Rating Scale is scored on a 5-point scale with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. |
| 4 and 12 weeks after the final treatment |
| Percentage of subjects who improved at least 1 grade of Subject-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (SR-SMFRS) | Submental Fat Rating Scale is scored on a 5-point scale with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. | 4 and 12 weeks after the final treatment |
| Volume difference of pre-platysmal submental fat around chin area | Volume of pre-platysmal submental fat around chin area was measured using MRI | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| Volume difference of platysmal submental fat around chin area | Volume of platysmal submental fat around chin area was measured using MRI | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| Percentage of subjects who improved at least 2 grades in both Evaluator-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (ER-SMFRS) and Subject-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (SR-SMFRS) | Submental Fat Rating Scale is scored on a 5-point scale with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = extreme. | 4 and 12 weeks after the final treatment |
| Difference of Subject Self Satisfaction Scale (SSSS) | Subject Self Satisfaction Scale (SSSS) assesses participants' satisfaction with their appearance in association with the face and chin on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6 with 0 = Extremely dissatisfied, 1 = Dissatisfied, 2 = Slightly dissatisfied, 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = Slightly satisfied, 5 = Satisfied and 6 = Extremely satisfied. | 4 and 12 weeks after the final treatment |
| Difference of Patient-Reported Submental Fat Impact Scale (PR-SMFIS) score | Patients are asked to rate the visual and emotional impact that the appearance of submental fullness had on their self-perception using 11-point scale range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). | 4 and 12 weeks after the final treatment |
| Difference of volume of submental fat around chin area analyzed with 3D | Volume of submental fat around chin area is measured using a 3D scanner photograph | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC) | Patient global impression of change scale (PGIC) is to rate patients total improvement or worsening in the appearance since before the first treatment compared to final treatment with 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse. | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| Difference of Derriford Appearance Scale 24 (DAS24) | Difference of Derriford Appearance Scale 24 (DAS24) score is to measure distress and dysfunction to problems of appearance with 24 item scale. | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| Difference of Body Image Quality Life Inventory (BIQLI) score | Body Image Quality Life Inventory (BIQLI) assesses participants' body image using 7 point ranging from -3 (very negative) to +3 (very positive). | 4 weeks after the final treatment |
| D008232 |
| Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |