Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, multi-center, single arm, open label, non-randomized study to evaluate the ability of [68Ga]FAPI-46 to detect FAP expressing cells in patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. The [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET scans will be acquired after initial staging using institutional standard methods. If the participant is prescribed neoadjuvant therapy, a second [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET scan will be performed within 21 days prior to planned surgical resection. This will be followed by histopathology and IHC analyses and comparison to resected PDAC tumor specimens.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT | Experimental | Patients receive [68Ga]FAPI-46 intravenously followed by PET/CT 15-25 minutes later |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [68Ga]FAPI-46 | Drug | [68Ga]-FAPI-46 is a radioactive diagnostic agent indicated for use with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging for the detection of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) positive cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET Imaging to Detect PDAC, Using Histopathology as Truth Standard | Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of participants with histopathology-confirmed PDAC who had a positive [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET result for the primary lesion. Sensitivity was calculated by comparing positive and negative [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET findings with the corresponding histopathology results, using a single readable PET image matched to its reference histopathology assessment. Sensitivity was calculated as A / (A + C), where A represents true-positive findings and C represents false-negative findings. Higher sensitivity indicates a greater ability of [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET to detect FAP-expressing disease and a lower likelihood of false-negative results, thereby reflecting the effectiveness of the imaging modality relative to the histopathological reference standard. | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation Between [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET Uptake (SUVmax) and IHC Staining Intensity (H-score) in FAP-positive Lesions | The association between [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET uptake, measured by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and FAP expression, assessed by H-score from histopathology, was evaluated. The relationship between SUVmax and H-score was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, in participants with evaluable PET imaging and histopathology results may not be linear owing in part to the H score ceiling of 300. All available paired PET and H-score measurements were included; when both pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy data were available, each time point was analyzed separately. Spearman's rho was selected because it assesses monotonic relationships between ordinal or continuous variables and does not assume linearity, which may not be appropriate for the relationship between SUVmax and H-score. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
trace amounts of sodium acetate sodium ascorbate and/or hydrochloric acid
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Health | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States | ||
| BAMF Health |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38011131 | Derived | Karbhari A, Mosessian S, Trivedi KH, Valla F Jr, Jacobson M, Truty MJ, Patnam NG, Simeone DM, Zan E, Brennan T, Chen H, Kuo PH, Herrmann K, Goenka AH. Gallium-68-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-46 PET in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A phase 2, multicenter, single arm, open label non-randomized study protocol. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294564. eCollection 2023. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 63 participants were enrolled in the study.
This was a prospective, multicenter, single arm, open label, non-randomized study to evaluate the ability of [68Ga]FAPI-46 to detect fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expressing cells in participants with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET/CT | Participants received an intravenous administration of [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46, followed by PET/CT imaging performed approximately 15 to 25 minutes post-injection to evaluate uptake in FAP-expressing tumor tissue in participants with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Safety Analysis Set which comprises of all participants who received any amount of [68Ga]FAPI-46.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET/CT | Participants received an intravenous administration of [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46, followed by PET/CT imaging performed approximately 15 to 25 minutes post-injection to evaluate uptake in FAP-expressing tumor tissue in participants with PDAC. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sensitivity of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET Imaging to Detect PDAC, Using Histopathology as Truth Standard | Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of participants with histopathology-confirmed PDAC who had a positive [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET result for the primary lesion. Sensitivity was calculated by comparing positive and negative [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET findings with the corresponding histopathology results, using a single readable PET image matched to its reference histopathology assessment. Sensitivity was calculated as A / (A + C), where A represents true-positive findings and C represents false-negative findings. Higher sensitivity indicates a greater ability of [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET to detect FAP-expressing disease and a lower likelihood of false-negative results, thereby reflecting the effectiveness of the imaging modality relative to the histopathological reference standard. | Efficacy Analysis Set 1 comprised of all participants who received [68Ga]FAPI-46, with an interpretable FAPI-46 PET image result (positive or negative) for at least 1 lesion with a corresponding histopathology result (positive or negative). Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints have been presented. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Day 1 |
2 years
All-cause mortality was calculated in all enrolled population (N=63). TEAEs and Serious-TEAE were collected in safety analysis set (N=58) which comprised of all participants who received any amount of [68Ga]FAPI-46.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET/CT | Participants received an intravenous administration of [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46, followed by PET/CT imaging performed approximately 15 to 25 minutes post-injection to evaluate uptake in FAP-expressing tumor tissue in participants with PDAC. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adenocarcinoma pancreas | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (25.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridget Adams, Director of Clinical Operations | Sofie Biosciences, Inc | +319 421-8448 | bridget.adams@sofie.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 31, 2023 | Mar 5, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 27, 2025 | Mar 5, 2026 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000706531 | FAPI-46 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Day 1 |
| Sensitivity of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET to Detect FAP-expressing Cells Using H-score as Standard of Truth | Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of participants with IHC confirmed FAP-expressing cells who had a positive [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET result for the primary lesion. Sensitivity was calculated as A / (A + C), where A represents true positive findings and C represents false negative findings. Higher sensitivity indicates a greater ability of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET to detect IHC confirmed FAP expression and a lower likelihood of false negative results, thereby reflecting the effectiveness of the imaging modality relative to the IHC reference standard. Sensitivity was presented considering IHC-positive results using 3 IHC cut-off values: > 50: Overall positive versus negative expression; > 100: Moderate to high expression and > 200: High expression only. | Day 1 |
| Specificity of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET to Detect FAP-expressing Cells Using H-score as Standard of Truth | Specificity was defined as the proportion of participants without IHC-confirmed FAP-expressing cells who had a negative [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET result for the primary lesion. Specificity was calculated by comparing positive and negative [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET findings with the corresponding IHC results, using a single readable PET image matched to its reference IHC assessment. Specificity was calculated as D / (B + D), where B represents false-positive findings and D represents true-negative findings. PET results were compared with the corresponding IHC reference assessment using a single readable PET image per participant. Specificity was evaluated considering IHC-positive results using 3 IHC cut-off values > 50: Overall positive versus negative expression; > 100: Moderate to high expression and > 200: High expression only. | Day 1 |
| Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A TEAE is any AE that occurs after receipt of one or more doses of study drug through the end of study for that participant. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death or is life-threatening or requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or results in persistent disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically significant / important event or reaction. | Up to 2 years |
| Grand Rapids |
| Michigan |
| 49503 |
| United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| NYU Langone Health | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Study drug not administered |
|
| Other |
|
| Progressive disease |
|
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT | Participants received an intravenous administration of [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46, followed by PET/CT imaging performed approximately 15 to 25 minutes post-injection to evaluate uptake in FAP-expressing tumor tissue in participants with PDAC. |
|
|
| Secondary | Correlation Between [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET Uptake (SUVmax) and IHC Staining Intensity (H-score) in FAP-positive Lesions | The association between [⁶⁸Ga]FAPI-46 PET uptake, measured by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and FAP expression, assessed by H-score from histopathology, was evaluated. The relationship between SUVmax and H-score was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, in participants with evaluable PET imaging and histopathology results may not be linear owing in part to the H score ceiling of 300. All available paired PET and H-score measurements were included; when both pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy data were available, each time point was analyzed separately. Spearman's rho was selected because it assesses monotonic relationships between ordinal or continuous variables and does not assume linearity, which may not be appropriate for the relationship between SUVmax and H-score. | Efficacy Analysis Set 2 comprised of all participants who received [68Ga]FAPI-46, with interpretable FAPI-46 PET image results (positive or negative) for at least 1 lesion with corresponding IHC results (positive or negative). Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints have been presented. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Correlation coefficient | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sensitivity of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET to Detect FAP-expressing Cells Using H-score as Standard of Truth | Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of participants with IHC confirmed FAP-expressing cells who had a positive [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET result for the primary lesion. Sensitivity was calculated as A / (A + C), where A represents true positive findings and C represents false negative findings. Higher sensitivity indicates a greater ability of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET to detect IHC confirmed FAP expression and a lower likelihood of false negative results, thereby reflecting the effectiveness of the imaging modality relative to the IHC reference standard. Sensitivity was presented considering IHC-positive results using 3 IHC cut-off values: > 50: Overall positive versus negative expression; > 100: Moderate to high expression and > 200: High expression only. | Efficacy Analysis Set 2 comprised of all participants in Cohort 1 who received [68Ga]FAPI-46, with interpretable FAPI-46 PET image results (positive or negative) for at least 1 lesion with corresponding IHC results (positive or negative). Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints have been presented. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Proportion of participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Specificity of [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET to Detect FAP-expressing Cells Using H-score as Standard of Truth | Specificity was defined as the proportion of participants without IHC-confirmed FAP-expressing cells who had a negative [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET result for the primary lesion. Specificity was calculated by comparing positive and negative [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET findings with the corresponding IHC results, using a single readable PET image matched to its reference IHC assessment. Specificity was calculated as D / (B + D), where B represents false-positive findings and D represents true-negative findings. PET results were compared with the corresponding IHC reference assessment using a single readable PET image per participant. Specificity was evaluated considering IHC-positive results using 3 IHC cut-off values > 50: Overall positive versus negative expression; > 100: Moderate to high expression and > 200: High expression only. | Efficacy Analysis Set 2. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints have been presented. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Proportion of participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A TEAE is any AE that occurs after receipt of one or more doses of study drug through the end of study for that participant. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death or is life-threatening or requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or results in persistent disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically significant / important event or reaction. | Safety Analysis Set | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 2 years |
|
|
|
| 3 |
| 63 |
| 1 |
| 58 |
| 3 |
| 58 |
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (25.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis contact | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (25.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|