Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| German Federal Ministry of Education and Research | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
aap001 is a randomized, controlled, subject-blinded, multi-center study to show the safety of the LOQTEQ® antibacterial silver-coated system is non-inferior in comparison with the uncoated LOQTEQ® system
Antimicrobial coatings of implants are of interest to reduce infection rate in orthopaedic surgery. Demonstration of clinical effectiveness of such coated implants to obtain market approval is challenging. The objective of this article is to define a design for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a silver-coating for locking plates for fracture treatment.
The study design has to respect different criteria, such as feasibility, focus on overall complications, such as functional impairment, fracture healing and infection rates. The study design was defined as randomized, controlled, subject-blinded, multi-center study in subjects with fractures of the distal fibula with a total of 184 patients. A number of 92 patients are planned for each of the two treatment arms with treatment of the fracture with a silver-coated device (first arm) or with an uncoated device (second arm). Inclusion criteria are closed and open fractures of the distal fibula with Gustilo-Anderson type I to Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB type older than 18 years. Primary outcome parameter is the Anticipated Adverse Device Effects (AADE) including all typical complications of this type of injury, such as functional impairment of the affected limb, non-union and infections based on a non-inferiority study design. Also, silver-typical complications, such as argyria, are included. Secondary parameters are infection rates and fracture healing. Follow-up of patients includes five visits with clinical and X-ray evaluations with a follow-up time of 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver-coated Implant | Experimental | The summary description and intended purpose of the investigational device (LOQTEQ® antibacterial silver-coated system) is the same as that of the comparator device (LOQTEQ® 3.5 System (uncoated) system). The investigational device differs from the comparator device in that its surface which has been modified by the addition of an antibacterial coating. |
|
| Uncoated Implant | Active Comparator | The summary description and intended purpose of the investigational device (LOQTEQ® antibacterial silver-coated system) is the same as that of the comparator device (LOQTEQ® 3.5 System (uncoated) system) and differes only in the lack of the antibacterial coating. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implantation | Device | Fractures of the distal fibula are treated with a trauma implant. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anticipated Adverse Device Effect (AADE) | The primary endpoint for this study is the proportion of subjects with at least one predefined Anticipated Adverse Device Effect (AADE) within 12 months of implantation. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of subjects with device related infections | Investigate the proportion of subjects with device-related infections occurring after successful implantation of study device and end of the 12-month FU and compare the rate between treatment arms. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Radiographic (X-ray) fracture healing |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject unable to give written informed consent, is unlikely to cooperate or is legally incompetent.
Subjects with consumptive / malignant primary disease and a life expectancy of less than 12 months.
Subjects with a known allergy to silver or any components of the device.
Subjects with an already implanted silver-coated device other than the investigational device.
History of or ongoing chronic soft-tissue and/or bone and/or implant infection signs at the distal tibia and/or distal fibula (not related to current fracture).
Subjects with a possible contraindication for the investigational and comparator devices
Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating at Screening Visit.
Females who are of childbearing potential and not taking adequate contraceptive precautions are excluded from the trial. Females of childbearing potential taking acceptable contraceptive precautions according to investigator's judgement can be included.
Males with partners who are pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential and are unwilling to use condoms for the duration of the study. Males who are unable or unwilling to use condoms can be included if partners of childbearing potential taking acceptable contraceptive precautions according to investigator's judgement.
Participation in any other study involving an investigational drug or device currently or within the past 3 months.
Subject has a significant history of drug/solvent abuse.
Subject has a history of alcohol abuse or currently drinks more than 224 g alcohol for men and 112 g alcohol for women per week.
Subjects with stage IV vascular disease, i.e. with presence of necrotic tissue at the distal tibia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Volker Alt, Prof. Dr. | Universitätsklinikum Regensburg | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitätsklinikum Regensburg | Regensburg | Bavaria | 93042 | Germany | ||
| Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36456987 | Derived | Schoder S, Lafuente M, Alt V. Silver-coated versus uncoated locking plates in subjects with fractures of the distal tibia: a randomized, subject and observer-blinded, multi-center non-inferiority study. Trials. 2022 Dec 1;23(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06919-0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005597 | Fractures, Open |
| D005596 | Fractures, Closed |
| D013530 | Surgical Wound Infection |
| D000092504 | Fibula Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D014946 | Wound Infection |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Investigate fracture healing assessed by local and central reviewer and compare the rate of completely healed subjects between treatment arms. |
| Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Hospitalization and nights spent in hospital | Investigate the number of hospitalizations occurring in the first 12 months post-implantation and the nights spent in hospital and compare the numbers between treatment arms. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Change in Ankle-Hindfoot Score (AOFAS) | Investigate the change in AOFAS at each FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The change is defined as the difference between AOFAS at the respective FU and the AOFAS at the 1-week FU. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Change in Average Pain at Rest (VAS) | Investigate the change in average pain at rest at each FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The Change in Average Pain is defined as the difference between VAS value at the respective FU and the AOFAS at the 1-week FU. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Change in Disability Rating Index (DRI) | Investigate the change in the disability rating index at each FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The change in DRI is defined as the difference between DRI at the respective FU and at the 1-week FU. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| EQ-5D-5L | Investigate all items assessed in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The changes from Screening will be compared between treatment arms for all FU visits. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Weight bearing | Investigate the proportion of subjects with full weight bearing at each FU visit and compare this endpoint between the treatment arms. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Change in Silver Serum Levels | Investigate the change in silver serum levels at each scheduled FU visit and compare endpoint between the treatment arms. The change in silver serum level is defined as the difference between the respective silver level at the respective FU and the silver level at Screening/Enrollment Visit. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Proportion of subjects with Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) | Investigate the proportion of subjects with TEAEs during the 12-month FU and compare the rate between treatment arms. | Implantation until 12 months follow-up |
| Berlin |
| 12683 |
| Germany |
| Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch GmbH | Berlin | 13125 | Germany |
| Städtisches Klinikum Dresden | Dresden | 01067 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden | Dresden | 01307 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Freiburg | Freiburg im Breisgau | 79106 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Gießen-Marburg | Giessen | 35385 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Homburg-Saar | Homburg | 66421 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Leipzig | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Münster | Münster | 48149 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Rostock | Rostock | Germany |
| Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal | Wuppertal | 42109 | Germany |
| Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal | Wuppertal | 42283 | Germany |
| D011183 |
| Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |