Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
It is essential to improve clinical efficiency and management of hematological and oncological patients treated on an outpatient basis. The most promising operative way to achieve this result is the development of tele-oncology platforms, that allow not only a telemedicine visit, but also the patient support in the daily management of the disease and related disorders, as well as treatments and their complications. In this perspective, the RITA communication platform should be able to support the patient, the caregiver, the physician and the general practitioner in the management of the disease and its treatments.
Summary description of the investigational device:
The RITA "Remote Intelligence for Therapeutic Adherence" application was designed, on the doctor's side, as a support for the management of the onco-hematological patient and, on the patient's side, as a first aid tool for the management of the most common problems, as well as an efficient and "non-invasive" means of communication with the doctor. The system also allows the caregiver and general practitioner to be included in the communication group.
The added value of the app consists in improving the relationship between the patient and the doctor, creating an effective communication channel, increasing the safety the patient has when facing his difficult path, reducing the number of visits to the facility and, in general, making those visits more efficient, thus creating savings both in terms of time and resources. RITA is also designed to communicate and receive information on the quality of life and side effects, thus making the medical doctor aware of the progress of treatments in his patient population.
Often occurs that the mild drug/disease related symptoms that the patient perceive during the treatment period are underestimated, leading to a more severe symptomatology that could impair the patient adherence to treatment. Thanks to the app RITA, on the patients side it will be easier to notify their daily physical condition, while on the physician side it will be easier to manage and solve the mild symptoms the patient could face during the treatment period, improving the overall adherence to the treatment.
The mobile app, which can also be used on a conventional desktop or laptop, aims to optimize the interaction between the onco-hematological patient and the referring physician. The hospital doctor will have access to the website, in order to manage all the functions through the appropriate dashboard.
Intended purpose of the investigational device in the proposed clinical investigation:
The application allows, on the patient side, to:
While, on the hospital doctor side, the website allows to:
Description of the specific medical procedures involved in the use of the investigational device:
Possible features of the RITA app:
Rationale for benefit-risk ratio.
The major risk for onco-hematologic patients is the progression of their underlying disease and the consequent reduction in the quality of life, which can be accelerated by a reduced adherence to the therapy. Risks associated with participation in the clinical investigation are the same as the risks identified for the general use. No additional risk is identified, specifically related to the participation in the clinical investigation, as the patient does not receive a lowered standard of care. Moreover, no special risks are reported due to the use of applications for adherence to treatment.
Therefore, the potential risks identified in association with the treatment administered with the App RITA are justified by the anticipated benefits resulting from the implementation of the standard of care aiming at improving the patients' involvement in their own health management and intended increase of adherence to treatment.
Primary Objective
The primary objective is the evaluation of patients' compliance to treatment through the use of the app RITA, thanks to more efficient management of the patients' mild symptoms that could, if not promptly treated, lead to a more severe condition and sometimes to the treatment interruption.
Secondary Objectives
Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is the evaluation of the therapeutic adherence measured as at least the 80% of the relative dose intensity (defined as the ratio of delivered dose intensity to the prescribed referenced dose intensity, expressed as a percentage) during the study period. The effectiveness of the RITA app use will be evaluated by comparing results on therapeutic adherence with a historical group of cancer patients.
Secondary Endpoint
Secondary endpoints based on the comparisons between groups:
Secondary endpoints on the safety assessment of RITA APP:
Medical Device CLASS IIA
Determination of Sample Size With a total of 112 patients (56 patients in the interventional arm and 56 in the patient-level historical group), this investigation will have 80% power to detect a 20% improvement in treatment adherence (i.e., in the intervention group, 90% or more as compared to 70%) (Passardi et al., 2022), with a one-sided type I error rate of 0.05. We set a goal of enrolling 124 patients to account for a drop-out rate of 10% (Passardi et al., 2022), with a consequent enrollment of 62 patients per arm.
Statistical Analyses
In the primary analysis, all the patients observed until the end of the study will be included.
Patients in the historical group will be matched with patients in the prospective interventional study according to cancer diagnosis and type of anticancer treatment.
The main characteristics of the patients will be reported using descriptive analyses by tabulating frequencies and percentages (categorical variables) and mean and median values, standard deviations (SD), quartiles and extreme values (continuous variables). With reference to comparison between groups, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of the RITA app, using logistic regression models. The statistical significance limit will be accepted as 5%, and the results below this value (P < .05) will be considered statistically significant. Comparisons within group (i.e., in the interventional study group) will be performed by using the paired t-test or the corresponding Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric test for paired samples, after checking data were normally distributed (based on the Shapiro-Wilk statistic). Comparisons between groups (i.e., interventional and historical) for continuous data will be analysed using a two-sided Student's t-test, after checking data were normally distributed (based on the Shapiro-Wilk statistic) and a two-sided Wilcoxon's rank-sum test otherwise. For categorical data comparisons between groups will be performed by using the contingency table analysis with the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, when appropriate. Explorative analyses, with descriptive purpose only, will be performed in the subgroups of potential determinants of adherence of anticancer treatments, including age, gender, educational status, stage of disease, comorbidities, poly-pharmacy and complexity of oral anticancer regimens(weekly/daily). Adverse events occurring during the study follow-up will be tabulated.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL
All participant data relating to the study will be recorded on eCRF. The investigator is responsible for verifying that data entries are accurate and correct by electronically signing the eCRF.
The investigator must maintain accurate documentation (source data) that supports the information entered in the eCRF.
The investigator must permit study-related monitoring, audits, IRB/IEC review, and regulatory agency inspections and provide direct access to source data documents.
Monitoring details describing strategy (eg, risk-based initiatives in operations and quality such as Risk Management and Mitigation Strategies and Analytical Risk-Based Monitoring), methods, responsibilities, and requirements, including handling of noncompliance issues and monitoring techniques (central, remote, or on-site monitoring) are provided in the monitoring plan.
The sponsor or designee is responsible for the data management of this study including quality checking of the data.
The sponsor assumes accountability for actions delegated to other individuals (eg, Contract Research Organizations).
Study monitors will perform ongoing source data verification to confirm that data entered into the eCRF by authorised site personnel are accurate, complete, and verifiable from source documents; that the safety and rights of participants are being protected; and that the study is being conducted in accordance with the currently approved protocol and any other study agreements, ICH GCP, and all applicable regulatory requirements.
Data Management System The CRFs in this trial are implemented electronically using a dedicated EDC system (ICE, Integrated Clinical Trial Environment, Advice Pharma) that fulfils the legal requirements for clinical trials. The EDC system is activated for the user only after successfully passing a formal test procedure. All data entered in the EDC are stored on a Linux server in a dedicated Oracle database.
Monitoring The study will be monitored on a regular basis by the Sponsor's adequately qualified and trained clinical Monitors throughout the study period to ensure the proper conduct of the clinical Investigation.
The purposes of study monitoring are to verify that the rights and well-being of study subjects are protected, that the reported study data are accurate, complete and verifiable against the source documents, and that the study is conducted in accordance with the current clinical investigation plan, Good Clinical Practice guideline (UNI EN ISO 14155) and applicable regulatory requirements.
Audits and Inspections Upon request by the Sponsor, on-site study audits may be conducted in order to ensure the study is in compliance with GCP, applicable regulatory requirements, and the clinical investigation plan. The auditing activities may also be conducted after study completion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| App RITA | Experimental | The interventional study group will use the Device Rita, an application that allow the oncological and onco-hematological patients to receive and communicate information about the quality of life and about the treatment related adverse events, providing a support in the therapy management. The access to the app functionalities is granted when the physician habilitates the personal profile. The app can be also used from people designated from the patient as caregiver, who can view the data inserted by the patient and, if enabled, they can insert the data for the patient. |
|
| Retrospective Historical | No Intervention | This clinical trial has no control intervention; on the other hand, the clinical outcomes of this treatment will be compared with the retrospective clinical data obtained from a historical group of comparison. The historic control used in this clinical trial is specifically selected to reflect the endpoints. According to a feasibility phase of this study, the information on the date of start and end of treatments is routinely collected in the medical records of patients, and for this reason, these data are potentially already available for the historical control group. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RITA (App) | Device | The RITA "Remote Intelligence for Therapeutic Adherence" application was designed, on the doctor's side, as a support for the management of the onco-hematological patient and, on the patient's side, as a first aid tool for the management of the most common problems, as well as an efficient and "non-invasive" means of communication with the doctor. The system also allows the caregiver and general practitioner to be included in the communication group. The added value of the app consists in improving the relationship between the patient and the doctor, creating an effective communication channel, increasing the safety the patient has when facing his difficult path, reducing the number of visits to the facility and, in general, making those visits more efficient, thus creating savings both in terms of time and resources. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluating changes in actual dose intensity | The primary outcome is defined as the comparison between the proportion of patients with at least 20% of increase in the relative dose intensity (defined as the ratio of delivered dose intensity to the prescribed referenced dose intensity, expressed as a percentage) of anticancer treatment during the study period in the two arms (i.e., intervention and historical group). The actual delivered dose intensity will be evaluated at each follow up visit through the drug accountability performed onsite. | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of grade 3-4 adverse events | Incidence of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| Number of visits to the Emergency Room | Number of visits to the emergency room for complications not requiring hospitalization Number of visits to the emergency room for severe complications requiring hospitalization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Minor complications | Number of AE/minor complications not requiring assistance notified by the patient during the study period, through the app RITA and directly during the clinical visit, compared to the historical control group | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| Safety Outcome - Adverse events |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alessandro Flavio Ferri | Advice Pharma Group S.r.l. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - SSD Ematologia - Neoplasie Ematologiche P.O. San Carlo | Milan | Milano | 20153 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11235824 | Background | Sandstrom M, Wilen J, Oftedal G, Hansson Mild K. Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms. Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones. Occup Med (Lond). 2001 Feb;51(1):25-35. doi: 10.1093/occmed/51.1.25. | |
| 10912374 | Background | Oftedal G, Wilen J, Sandstrom M, Mild KH. Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Lond). 2000 May;50(4):237-45. doi: 10.1093/occmed/50.4.237. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, interventional, confirmatory investigation, pre-market study, with a historical group of comparison
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| Number of days in hospital | Average number of days in hospital stay | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| Quality of life change - Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L | Evaluation of changes in the quality of life perceived by the patients using the validated questionnaire for data collection EQ-5D-5L | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| Quality of life change - Questionnaire EORTC QLQC30 | Evaluation of changes in the quality of life perceived by the cancer patients using the validated questionnaire for data collection EORTC QLQC30 | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| RITA APP Experience evaluation | User Experience in using the RITA APP, through the questions proposed by the app about the user satisfaction | Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
Occurrence of individual adverse events (%) reported during the follow up period, during the use session, and during intervals between one use session and the following Occurrence of device adverse events (%) during the use session |
| Daily/ Assessment at each month for three months |
| 11102297 | Background | Chia SE, Chia HP, Tan JS. Prevalence of headache among handheld cellular telephone users in Singapore: a community study. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Nov;108(11):1059-62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081059. |
| 11255218 | Background | Koivisto M, Haarala C, Krause CM, Revonsuo A, Laine M, Hamalainen H. GSM phone signal does not produce subjective symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001 Apr;22(3):212-5. doi: 10.1002/bem.41. |
| 10024730 | Background | Hocking B. Preliminary report: symptoms associated with mobile phone use. Occup Med (Lond). 1998 Sep;48(6):357-60. doi: 10.1093/occmed/48.6.357. |
| 11948605 | Background | Hietanen M, Hamalainen AM, Husman T. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: no causal link. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002 May;23(4):264-70. doi: 10.1002/bem.10016. |
| 12669297 | Background | Wilen J, Sandstrom M, Hansson Mild K. Subjective symptoms among mobile phone users--a consequence of absorption of radiofrequency fields? Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 Apr;24(3):152-9. doi: 10.1002/bem.10101. |
| 10674497 | Background | Koivisto M, Revonsuo A, Krause C, Haarala C, Sillanmaki L, Laine M, Hamalainen H. Effects of 902 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular telephones on response times in humans. Neuroreport. 2000 Feb 7;11(2):413-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200002070-00038. |
| 17359515 | Background | Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A, Stovner LJ. Mobile phone headache: a double blind, sham-controlled provocation study. Cephalalgia. 2007 May;27(5):447-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01336.x. Epub 2007 Mar 14. |
| 16520326 | Background | Rubin GJ, Hahn G, Everitt BS, Cleare AJ, Wessely S. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ. 2006 Apr 15;332(7546):886-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55. Epub 2006 Mar 6. |
| 41894682 | Derived | Dalto SC, Romanelli A, Violati M, Galeone C, Gaudesi D, Sacchi F, Beccaria M, Moroni M, Ferri A, Montefusco V. Use of Software as a Medical Device to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Patients With Hematological Malignancies: Prospective Interventional MargheRITA Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2026 Mar 27;14:e59662. doi: 10.2196/59662. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009101 | Multiple Myeloma |
| D054219 | Neoplasms, Plasma Cell |
| D000686 | Amyloidosis |
| D015464 | Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive |
| D015451 | Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell |
| D016399 | Lymphoma, T-Cell |
| D006689 | Hodgkin Disease |
| D016393 | Lymphoma, B-Cell |
| D015470 | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute |
| D000754 | Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts |
| D009196 | Myeloproliferative Disorders |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D020141 | Hemostatic Disorders |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010265 | Paraproteinemias |
| D001796 | Blood Protein Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006474 | Hemorrhagic Disorders |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D057165 | Proteostasis Deficiencies |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D007951 | Leukemia, Myeloid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D001855 | Bone Marrow Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D015448 | Leukemia, B-Cell |
| D007945 | Leukemia, Lymphoid |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D000753 | Anemia, Refractory |
| D000740 | Anemia |
| D009190 | Myelodysplastic Syndromes |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided