Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study is currently on hold, pending further evaluation and coordination.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The GLEAM trial is a multicenter, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial to assess the effects of programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion on the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery and several other clinically-relevant outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The goal of Labor Epidural Analgesia (LEA) to provide optimal analgesia while limiting any impact on the course of labor. Until recently, the most common technique for epidural analgesia was a combination of continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). CEI delivers an infusion of local anesthetic into the epidural space at a constant rate. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB)-a more recently-developed alternative to CEI-delivers intermittent boluses of local anesthetic into the epidural space at scheduled time intervals.
A series of randomized control trials (RCT) have compared PIEB and CEI with overall results favoring PIEB for superior analgesia. However, CEI has been shown to be associated with an increased amount of local anesthetic consumption, which may increase the degree of motor blockade, placing parturients at higher risk for instrumental and cesarean deliveries. Studies to date have offered conflicting conclusions on whether CEI is associated with a reduced rates of normal spontaneous vaginal delivery (NSVD).
AIM: The GLEAM trial aims to investigate the hypothesis that PIEB will have higher rates of NSVD than CEI. The effects of CEI vs. PIEB on cesarean delivery rate, instrumental vaginal delivery rate, length of second stage of labor, failed epidural rate.
TRIAL DESIGN: Multi-center, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial
PARTICIPATING SITE CRITERIA:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus | Active Comparator | Intermittent epidural bolus as the first line labor epidural analgesia maintenance infusion |
|
| Continuous Epidural Infusion | Active Comparator | Continuous epidural infusion as the first line labor epidural analgesia maintenance infusion |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIEB | Other | Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery | Rate of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (Percent of total deliveries) | Delivery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cesarean Delivery | Rate of Cesarean Delivery (Percent of total deliveries) | Delivery |
| Instrumental Vaginal Delivery | Rate of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery (Percent of total deliveries) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ronald B George, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCSF Mission Bay | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23223119 | Background | George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7. | |
| 30796286 | Background | Xu J, Zhou J, Xiao H, Pan S, Liu J, Shang Y, Yao S. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39248-5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pragmatic, cluster-randomized, open-labeled, multiple-crossover trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| CEI | Other | Continuous Epidural Infusion with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia |
|
| Delivery |
| Length of Second Stage | Length of Second Stage of Labor (hours) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| Failed Epidural | Rate of Failed Epidural, requiring general anesthesia or epidural replacement. (Percent of total labor epidural anesthetics) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| Local anesthetic concentration | Local anesthetic concentration (Percent solution) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| Epidural opioids used | Epidural opioid (identity of opioid) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| Epidural opioids used | Epidural opioid concentration (µg/mL) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| CEI rate | Continuous Epidural Infusion Rate (mL/hr) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| PIEB Volume | Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Volume (mL) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| PIEB Interval | Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (minutes) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| PCEA Volume | Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia bolus volume (mL) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| PCEA Lockout | Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia lockout time (minutes) | During labor up to time of delivery |
| 21788309 | Background | Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):826-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8. Epub 2011 Jul 25. |
| 26775896 | Background | McKenzie CP, Cobb B, Riley ET, Carvalho B. Programmed intermittent epidural boluses for maintenance of labor analgesia: an impact study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 May;26:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 27. |
| 27100210 | Background | Tien M, Allen TK, Mauritz A, Habib AS. A retrospective comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for maintenance of labor analgesia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Aug;32(8):1435-40. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1181619. Epub 2016 May 20. |
| 28131113 | Background | Onuoha OC. Epidural Analgesia for Labor: Continuous Infusion Versus Programmed Intermittent Bolus. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Mar;35(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Dec 12. |