Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparison between two minimally invasive approaches to the hip joint.
Following parameters were compared: modified Barthel-Index, pain, complications, developing of heterotopic ossification.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterolateral approach |
| ||
| Direct anterior approach |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior versus lateral approach to hip joint | Procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale | Pain score | one year after surgery |
Not provided
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria represented acute local or systemic infection, open or pathological fractures, concomitant injuries of the ipsi- or contralateral leg and rheumatoid arthritis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All consecutive patients, presenting with indication for bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip joint due to Garden III and IV fractures, who had given their written informed consent, were enrolled in the study. Exclusion
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 21, 2015 | Feb 15, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Dec 21, 2015 | Feb 15, 2022 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided