Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Computed tomography (CT) has become an established tool in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The availability of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) before the invasive procedure allows stratifying case complexity and can be used to improve patient selection for PCI, to plan and guide therapeutic interventions. Beyond the diagnostic and therapeutic phase, it helps to better organize the catheterization laboratory workflow.
The P4 study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized study with a non-inferiority design of patients with an indication for PCI aiming at comparing clinical outcomes between two imaging strategies to guide PCI, being coronary CT-guided PCI strategy (investigational technology) and IVUS-guided PCI strategy (comparator).
After identifying the presence of a significant coronary stenosis, the patient will be randomized either to CT- or IVUS-guided PCI groups. Both CT and IVUS-guided PCI will be performed following the P4 trial protocol. When the procedure is completed, post-PCI FFR will be measured. All patients will be followed in hospital, at 30 days (±15 days), 12 months (±1 month) and yearly until 5 year.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT-guided PCI strategy | Experimental | QAngio CT Research Edition is a software suite providing several functionalities for the analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scans to extract and present relevant information on the coronary vasculature for further clinical investigation. Also, QAngio CT Research Edition allows to export this information for later viewing during x-ray angiography (XA) procedures to help physicians plan and guide the interventional procedure. |
|
| intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI strategy | Active Comparator | Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an invasive intravascular imaging technique able to visualize the coronary vessel. The use of IVUS-guided PCI has been endorsed an recommended by the European Society of Cardiology. The device is considered part of standard of clinical care. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT-guided PCI | Device | CT-guided PCI with standardized pre-procedural planning and online guidance. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| rate of MACE between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategy | Comparison of the rate of the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization between CT- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies at 12-month follow-up | 12 months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare in-hospital resource utilization between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | Compare in-hospital resource utilization (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros) between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | during the intervention |
| Compare resource utilization at 12-month follow-up between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carlos Collet Bortone, MD, PhD | CoreAalst BV | Principal Investigator |
| Daniele Andreini, MD, PhD | Milan University, Milan, Italy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States | ||
| Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| IVUS-guided PCI | Device | use of IVUS during PCI procedure (standard of care) |
|
Compare resource utilization (procedural cost and cost from additional interventions in Euros) at 12-month follow-up between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI |
| 12 months follow-up |
| Compare radiation dose (defined as radiation dose from the invasive procedure) between CCTA- and IVUS- guided PCI strategies. | periprocedural time frame |
| Compare contrast volume (defined as contrast volume used during the invasive procedure) between CCTA- and IVUS- guided PCI strategies. | periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the rate of cardiac death between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | 12 months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of target-vessel myocardial infarction between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | 12 months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | 12 months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of PCI-related MI (type 4a a, 4th Universal Definition of MI) between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies | during the procedure |
| Compare the degree of functional revascularization, defined by post-PCI FFR values measured immediately after PCI between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the degree of functional revascularization, defined by FFRCT Planner, between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the rate of MACE between patient with complete and incomplete functional revascularization based on the FFRCT Planner, at 12-month follow-up. | 12 months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of MACE between patient with complete and incomplete functional revascularization based on the post-PCI FFR values measured immediately after PCI, at 12-month follow-up. | 12 months follow-up |
| Assess the agreement on post-PCI FFR between the FFRCT Planner and the invasive measurement. | periprocedural time frame |
| Assess the agreement between the FFRCT Planner strategy and the actual treatment performed. | periprocedural time frame |
| Assess the CCTA predictors of stent under expansion. | To assess which characteristics of the plaque, defined by CT, can predict whether the stent is under expansion (by multivariate analysis on the data) | periprocedural time frame |
| To compare angiographic Endpoints (Core Lab assessed QCA): - Final (post-PCI) minimal lumen diameter. - Final (post-PCI) percent diameter stenosis. - Acute lumen gain post-intervention. | periprocedural time frame |
| To compare the maximum device size (stent or post-dilatation balloon)/reference vessel diameter ratio) CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | periprocedural time frame |
| To compare angiographic complications CCTA- and IVUS guided PCI strategies. | Angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B, perforations (Ellis's classification), intra-procedural thrombotic events (including slow-flow, no-reflow, side branch closure, distal embolization, and intra-procedural stent thrombosis, as per the standard angiographic core laboratory definitions | periprocedural time frame |
| To compare procedural time (defined as the time from first to the last angiography) between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies. | periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the rate of symptoms-free status assessed by the SAQ-7 between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies at 12-months. | 12 months follow-up |
| Compare the change in symptoms assessed by the change of Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) scores between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies at 12-months. | 12 months follow-up |
| Compare the change in symptoms assessed by the change of EuroQol 5 dimensions - 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) scores between CCTA- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies at 12-months. | 12 months follow-up |
| Assess the capacity of the FFRCT Planner (predicted post-PCI FFR) to predict adverse events. | Assess whether the predicted post-PCI FFR value which is calculated by the FFRCT-planner can predict adverse outcomes | 12 months follow-up |
| Minneapolis |
| Minnesota |
| 55407 |
| United States |
| St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center | Roslyn | New York | 11576 | United States |
| UZ Brussels | Jette | Brussels Capital | 1090 | Belgium |
| OLV Hospital | Aalst | 9300 | Belgium |
| Hartcentrum ZNA Antwerp | Antwerp | 2000 | Belgium |
| Gentofte hospital | Gentofte Municipality | Hellerup | 2900 | Denmark |
| Aarhus Universitetshospital | Aarhus | 8200 | Denmark |
| Rigshospitalet | Copenhagen | 2100 | Denmark |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille | Lille | 59037 | France |
| Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University | Budapest | 1082 | Hungary |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara | Cona | 44124 | Italy |
| Humanitas University | Milan | 20090 | Italy |
| Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio | Milan | 20149 | Italy |
| Centro Cardiologico Monzino S.P.A. | Milan | Italy |
| Aichi Medical University | Aichi | Japan |
| University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole Hospital | Poole | Dorset | BH15 2JB | United Kingdom |
| Golden Jubilee National Hospital | Clydebank | G81 4DY, | United Kingdom |
| Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital | Liverpool | L14 3PE | United Kingdom |
| St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | London | ,SW17 0QT | United Kingdom |
| Barts Health NHS Trust | London | E1 1FR | United Kingdom |
| Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | London | United Kingdom |
| Freeman Hospital | Newcastle | NE7 7DN | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided