Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the aim of present study is to evaluate clinically the fracture liability , marginal adaptation , and patient satisfaction of conservative versus conventional ceramic Onlays use e-max press to restore defective restored molar with old restoration or caries. with one or more cusp defect
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| onlays conservative | Experimental | conservative onlays preparation with partial cusp coverage only defective cusps |
|
| onlays conventional | Active Comparator | onlays preparation design conventional as all cusps covered with shoulder finish line preparation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| onlays conservative | Other | Partial coverage of cusps with shoulder finish line |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| evaluation of fracture resistance | fracture resistance of restorations postoperatively: assessment of the restoration for fracture resistance , by using Measuring device Modified United States Public Health Service (MUSPHS) parameters were used to compare the restorations at baseline and final examination use explorer Measuring unit .Discrete(scores)
| one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| evaluation of marginal adaptation | marginal adaptation of restorations postoperatively assessment by Measuring device Modified USPHS Criteria Measuring unit .Discrete(scores) use explorer
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:Inclusion criteria:
All subjects are required to be:
1-From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients with teeth problems indicated for onlay restoration:
Decayed teeth
Teeth restored with defected filling restorations
Teeth with occlusal defect 5- Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation Exclusion criteria
Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years
Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients
Pregnant women
Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest
-
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howaida Elhagrasy, M.D.S | Contact | 01006890707 | howayda.elhagrasy@dentistry.cu.edu.eg | |
| Eman Hussein | Contact |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| onlays conventional |
| Other |
all coverage of cusps as overlay with shoulder finish line |
|
| 1 year |
| evaluation of patient satisfaction to the onlay restoration through questioning the patient about pain during eating , acceptability ,sensitivity | patient satisfaction of restoration use Questionnaire VAS* Measuring device Measuring unit Numerical(discrete) ('0' unsatisfied-'10' satisfied) | 1 year |