Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a Phase 1b/2, dose-escalation, randomized, multicenter study to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and PK of ivaltinostat in combination with capecitabine and capecitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma whose disease has not progressed on a first line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (e.g., FOLFIRINOX).
In Phase 1b, 3 dose levels of ivaltinostat will be studied in combination with a fixed dose of capecitabine to determine the RP2D of ivaltinostat.
In Phase 2, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the combination of ivaltinostat and capecitabine or to capecitabine monotherapy. A fixed dose for capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily will be taken on Days 1 to 14, and the RP2D of ivaltinostat will be administered intravenously once a week for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. One cycle consists of 21 days. Tumor response during study treatment will be assessed every 6 weeks up to Cycle 10, then every 9 weeks afterwards using RECIST v1.1 criteria.
There will be approximately 70 (18 Phase 1b dose-escalation, 52 Phase 2 randomized) patients in the study. In Phase 1b, 3 dose levels of ivaltinostat will be studied in combination with a fixed dose of capecitabine to determine the RP2D of ivaltinostat. In Phase 2, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the combination of ivaltinostat and capecitabine or to capecitabine monotherapy as specified below:
Arm A
The Phase 1b will enroll up to 18 patients (6 patients each of 3 dose levels of ivaltinostat [60, 125, and 250 mg/m2] + 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine BID) to assess the combination of ivaltinostat and capecitabine for safety and tolerability as well as to determine the ivaltinostat RP2D, assess the PDy of ivaltinostat, and assess PK parameters of both ivaltinostat and capecitabine. Data from the Phase 1b will be used in safety analyses but not in efficacy analyses.
Tumor response during study treatment will be assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Baseline and on-treatment tumor assessments will be performed using CT or MRI scans with contrast of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with other regions as clinically indicated for the assessment of disease. Baseline evaluation should be performed within the 28-day screening period prior to the start of study treatment, as close as possible to randomization. Follow-up assessment consistent with baseline radiologic evaluation (i.e., if CT scan was performed for baseline assessment, then CT scan should be done for the follow-up evaluation) should be performed approximately every 6 weeks (±1 week) until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST v1.1. In addition to the imaging listed above, any other sites with known disease, or at which new disease is suspected, should also be appropriately imaged. Safety evaluations will occur at each protocol-specified study visit.
Patients will continue to receive study treatment until objective radiographic disease progression per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by the Investigator or until unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Once patients have discontinued study treatment, subsequent treatment options will be at the discretion of the treating physician. It is anticipated (but not required) that patients may be retreated with their first line regimen. Patients will be contacted on an approximately every-8-week schedule and followed up for survival. Details of any further anti-cancer treatment will be collected until death, loss to follow up, or withdrawal of consent. In addition to contact every 8 weeks, patients will be contacted in the 7 days following a specified date (data cut-off date) to capture survival status at that point for each survival analysis. Any patient who discontinues study treatment for reasons other than objective radiographic progression should continue to undergo scheduled objective tumor assessments according to the study plan in order to assess objective radiographic progression of disease.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivaltinostat plus Capecitabine | Experimental | Ivaltinostat plus Capecitabine |
|
| Capecitabine Monotherapy | Active Comparator | Capecitabine Monotherapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivaltinostat | Drug | Ivaltinostat (E)-N1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-N8-hydroxy-2-((naphthalen-1-yloxy)methyl)oct-2-enediamide phosphate) is a novel anticancer therapeutic candidate that inhibits enzymatic activity of histone deacetylase (HDAC). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in phase 1 | The percentage of subjects who experience a grade 3 or higher adverse event that qualifies as a DLT | 15 months |
| Incidence of treatment emergent AEs in phase 1 | The number of subjects who experience an adverse event that was possibly related to study drug | 15 months |
| Treatment emergent changes in clinical laboratory tests in phase 1 | The number of subjects who experience a change in laboratory parameters that was possibly related to study drug. | 15 months |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Phase 2 | Investigator assessed PFS | 15 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cmax of ivaltinostat in Phase 1 and 2 | Cmax will be assessed through the maximum measured plasma concentration occurring at Tmax | 19 months |
| AUC of ivaltinostat in Phase 1 and 2 | Area under the plasma concentration (AUC) versus time curve from time 0 to time of least measurable concentration |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew H. Ko, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HonorHealth Research Institute | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85258 | United States | ||
| Hoag Medical Group |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39863139 | Derived | Tost J, Ak-Aksoy S, Campa D, Corradi C, Farinella R, Ibanez-Costa A, Dubrot J, Earl J, Melian EB, Kataki A, Kolnikova G, Madjarov G, Chaushevska M, Strnadel J, Tanic M, Tomas M, Dubovan P, Urbanova M, Buocikova V, Smolkova B. Leveraging epigenetic alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma for clinical applications. Semin Cancer Biol. 2025 Feb;109:101-124. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Jan 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In Phase 1b, 3 dose levels of ivaltinostat will be studied in combination with a fixed dose of capecitabine to determine the RP2D of ivaltinostat.
In Phase 2, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the combination of ivaltinostat and capecitabine or to capecitabine monotherapy. A fixed dose for capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily will be taken on Days 1 to 14, and the RP2D of ivaltinostat will be administered intravenously once a week for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. One cycle consists of 21 days. Tumor response during study treatment will be assessed every 6 weeks up to Cycle 10, then every 9 weeks afterwards using RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Capecitabine | Drug | Capecitabine is labeled for monotherapy for the treatment of adjuvant Dukes' C colon cancer and metastatic colon cancer at a recommended dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest. This dose schedule was effective and tolerable in the first line setting for patients with pancreatic cancer (Cartwright, 2002). |
|
|
| 19 months |
| Half-life (T1/2) of ivaltinostat in Phase 1 and 2 | Elimination half life will be calculated | 19 months |
| Objective response rate (ORR) in Phase 1 and 2 | ORR per RECIST v1.1 Overall survival (OS). | 19 months |
| Incidence of treatment emergent AEs in Phase 2 | The number of subjects who experience an adverse event that was possibly related to study drug | 19 months |
| Newport Beach |
| California |
| 92663 |
| United States |
| UCSF Medical Center | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| UCLA Hematology/Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| University Cancer and Blood Center | Athens | Georgia | 30607 | United States |
| Community Health Network | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46250 | United States |
| Norton Cancer Institute Audubon | Louisville | Kentucky | 40217 | United States |
| University Medical Center New Orleans | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 | United States |
| Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States |
| Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center | Buffalo | New York | 14263 | United States |
| Clinical Research Alliance | Westbury | New York | 11590 | United States |
| Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Utah Cancer Specialists | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Virginia Cancer Specialists | Fairfax | Virginia | 22031 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C572619 | N1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-N8-hydroxy-2-((naphthalene-1-loxy)methyl)oct-2-enediamide |
| D000069287 | Capecitabine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided