[Primary endpoint for the United States FDA] Percentage of participants achieving a Grade 0 or 1 (none or mild) and a ≥ 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to both investigator and participant assessments of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Day 7 are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Primary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to participant assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Day 7 are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Primary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to investigator assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Day 7 are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug.

Safety population: all participants who were treated with at least 1 dose of study drug. All safety analyses were performed with participants analyzed by their actual treatment received in the DB period/OL period.

[Secondary endpoint for the United States FDA] Percentage of participants achieving a Grade 0 or 1 (none or mild) and a ≥ 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to both investigator and participant assessments of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown over time are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for the United States FDA] Percentage of participants with a Grade 0 or 1 (none or mild) and at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to investigator assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown over time are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

Secondary endpoint for the United States FDA] Percentage of participants with a Grade 0 or 1 (none or mild) and at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to participant assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown over time are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity.

Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for the United States FDA] The FLSQ is a validated measure that assesses treatment expectations, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact of GL from the participant perspective. Participants assessed their overall satisfaction with their glabellar lines using a 5-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): very dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, mostly satisfied, and very satisfied. The percentage of participants mostly satisfied or very satisfied is reported. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for the United States FDA] The FLSQ is a validated measure that assesses treatment expectations, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact of GL from the participant perspective. Participants assessed their overall satisfaction with their glabellar lines using a 5-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): very dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, mostly satisfied, and very satisfied. The percentage of participants mostly satisfied or very satisfied is reported. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for the United States FDA] The FLSQ is a validated measure that assesses treatment expectations, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact of GL from the participant perspective. Participants assessed their satisfaction with natural look using a 5-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): very dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, mostly satisfied, and very satisfied. The percentage of participants mostly satisfied or very satisfied is reported. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] The Facial Lines Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire is an 11-item validated measure that assesses appearance-related psychological impacts of glabellar lines (GL) from the participant's perspective. Items 1-10 are assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale that ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 10 (Very much), with higher scores indicating negative impact. Item 11 is scored in the reverse direction. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50 were included. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to participant assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Hour 24 are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] Percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to investigator assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Hour 24 during the Double-Blind Period are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4- grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] Percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to participant assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Hour 24 are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] Percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-grade improvement from Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) according to investigator assessment of glabellar lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Hour 24 are reported. Assessments were performed using the 4-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] The FLSQ is a validated measure that assesses treatment expectations, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact of GL from the participant perspective.

Participants assessed their overall satisfaction with their glabellar lines using a 5-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS):

very dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, mostly satisfied, and very satisfied. The percentage of participants mostly satisfied or very satisfied is reported. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] The FLSQ is a validated measure that assesses treatment expectations, treatment satisfaction, and psychosocial impact of GL from the participant perspective.

Participants assessed their satisfaction with natural look using a 5-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): very dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, mostly satisfied, and very satisfied. The percentage of participants mostly satisfied or very satisfied is reported. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, with a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] The Facial Lines Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire is an 11-item validated measure that assesses appearance-related psychological impacts of glabellar lines (GL) from the participant's perspective. Items 1-10 are assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale that ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 10 (Very much), with higher scores indicating negative impact. Item 11 is scored in the reverse direction. Participants answered FLO-11 Item 10 (Look Angry). Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, and a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Participants with a score that could improve at least 4 points from Baseline were included.

Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

[Secondary endpoint for European Union regulatory agencies] The Facial Lines Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire is an 11-item validated measure that assesses appearance-related psychological impacts of glabellar lines (GL) from the participant's perspective. Items 1-10 are assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale that ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 10 (Very much), with higher scores indicating negative impact. Item 11 is scored in the reverse direction. Participants answered FLO-11 Item 5 (Look Less Attractive). Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment groups to which they were randomized, and a Baseline Facial Lines Outcome (FLO-11) total score (transformed) of ≤50. Participants with a score that could improve at least 4 points from Baseline were included.

Multiple imputation was used for missing data.