Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Brighten Optix Corporation | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare the rate of myopia progression of contact lenses utilising S.T.O.P.® technology against MiSight® contact lenses.
Myopic children (8-14 years of age) will be randomly allocated to wear one of 3 contact lens options (MiSight®, S.T.O.P.®- F2 or S.T.O.P.®- DT) bilaterally on a daily wear basis. The overall trial duration, including follow-up period, is expected to be approximately 48 months. Each participant's duration is expected to be approximately 36 months.
The visits are Baseline / Fit, Dispensing, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months then visits every 6 months after.
All procedures performed at these visits are standard, non invasive clinical tests.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiSight® | Active Comparator | MiSight® Contact Lens (Omafilcon A, 60% water) |
|
| S.T.O.P® F2 | Experimental | S.T.O.P® F2 Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water) |
|
| S.T.O.P® DT | Experimental | S.T.O.P® DT Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.T.O.P® F2 | Device | Ocufilcon D, 55% water |
| |
| S.T.O.P® DT |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Axial Length | Difference in change from baseline in axial length between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction | Difference in change from baseline in spherical equivalent autorefraction between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual performance as measured by high contrast visual acuity at 6 m | Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Visual performance as measured by a non validated questionnaire based on a 1-10 numeric rating scale where a higher score indicates a better outcome |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Be between 8-14.
Have:
Have their parent / legal guardian:
Along with their parent / legal guardian, be capable of comprehending the nature of the study, and be willing and able to adhere to study requirements.
Along with their parent / legal guardian, agree to maintain the visit schedule .
Agree to wear allocated contact lenses for a minimum of 5 days per week, at least 6 hours per day on days lenses are worn but not > 16 hours per day, and to remove lenses at night (i.e., daily wear only with no contact lens wear during sleep), for their duration of the study and to inform the investigator if their schedule is interrupted. Wearing time can be modified by the investigator for health reasons.
Possess wearable and visually functioning spectacles.
Be in good general health, based on the parent's / legal guardian's knowledge.
Have best-corrected high contrast visual acuity based on manifest refraction of 0.10 logMAR (20/25, 6/7.6) or better in each eye.
Meet the following criteria determined by cycloplegic autorefraction:
Spherical equivalent between -0.75 to -4.00 D inclusive.
Astigmatism ≥ -1.00 D.
*participants who fail astigmatism criterion with autorefraction pass astigmatism criterion if ≥ -0.75 D is measured with subjective refraction.
anisometropia ≤ 1.00 D.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participant is currently, or within 30 days prior to this study, has been an active participant in another study.
Current or prior use of ANY form of myopia control, including but not limited to:
Optical devices.
Pharmacological agents.
Participant born earlier than 30 weeks or weighed < 1500 g at birth.
Habitual use of a systemic or topical medication that may alter normal ocular findings / is known to affect a participant's ocular health / physiology or contact lens performance either in an adverse or beneficial manner at enrolment and / or during the clinical trial.
A known allergy to sodium fluorescein, benoxinate, proparacaine, or tropicamide.
Chinese sites: A known allergy to cyclopentolate.
A known corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, ocular viral or fungal infections, or any other recurrent ocular infections.
Strabismus by cover test at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) while wearing distance correction under non-cycloplegic conditions.
Known ocular or systemic disease, such as but not limited to:
Any ocular, systemic, or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development, such as but not limited to:
Keratoconus or irregular cornea.
Biomicroscopic that contraindicate contact lens, such as but limited to:
The investigator may, at their discretion, exclude anyone who they believe may not be able to fulfil the clinical trial requirements or it is believed to be in the participant's best interests.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Tilia, MOptom, PhD | nthalmic Pty Ltd | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wenzhou Medical University Eye Hospital | Wenzhou | Lucheng District | 325027 | China | ||
| Tianjin Medical University |
There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009216 | Myopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
Ocufilcon D, 55% water |
|
| MiSight® | Device | Omafilcon A (60% water) |
|
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses |
| 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Bulbar hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia | Differences in bulbar hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Limbal hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia | Differences in limbal hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Corneal neovascularization graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining | Differences in corneal neovascularization grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Palpebral roughness graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased roughness | Differences in palpebral roughness grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Corneal staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining | Differences in corneal staining grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Conjunctival staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining | Differences in conjunctival staining grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Corneal oedema graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased oedema | Differences in corneal oedema grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Blepharitis graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased blepharitis | Differences in blepharitis grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased MGD | Differences in MGD grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Corneal epithelial microcysts graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining | Differences in corneal epithelial microcysts grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Contact lens surface characteristics staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates worse contact lens surface characteristic. | Differences in contact lens surface characteristic grading between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Contact lens centration measured in mm | Differences in contact lens centration between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Contact lens primary gaze movement centration measured in mm where a higher value indicates increased movement in primary gaze | Differences in primary gaze movement between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Contact lens primary gaze lag centration measured in mm where a higher value indicates increased lag. | Differences in primary gaze lag between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Contact lens tightness measured as percentage where a higher percentage indicates a tighter lens | Differences in tightness between test and control contact lenses. | Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months |
| Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 3 m | Differences in heterophoria at 3 m between test and control contact lenses. | 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months |
| Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 40 cm | Differences in heterophoria at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses. | 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months |
| Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative response in diopters at 40 cm | Differences in monocular accommodative response at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses. | 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months |
| Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative facility (+/-2.00 D flipper) in cycles per minute at 40 cm | Differences in monocular accommodative facility at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses. | 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months |
| Tianjin |
| Wuqing District |
| 300384 |
| China |
| Shanghai Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital | Shanghai | Xuhui District | 200031 | China |
| LV Prasad Eye Institute | Hyderabad | Telangana | 500034 | India |
| Centre Universitari de la Visió | Terrassa | Barcelona | 08222 | Spain |
| Lab. de Superficie Ocular y Lentes de Contacto (SOYLC) | Santiago de Compostela | Galicia | 15899 | Spain |
| Ocupharm Research Group (Clinica Universitaria de Optometría), Universidad Complutense Madrid | Madrid | Madrid | 28037 | Spain |