Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study never approved by IRB or initiated
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to determine whether or not a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment nerve block is effective at improving postoperative pain control in patients receiving an anterior approach hip replacement surgery. In general, postoperative pain control has a significant impact on earlier ambulation, initiation of physical therapy, better functional recovery, and overall patient satisfaction. The hypothesis is that providing patients with this nerve block will decrease opioid requirements in patients undergoing this surgery as compared to patients that do not receive the block.
Study Design: Interventional Trial
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Treatment groups: Group A: Control Group - DAA THA under spinal anesthesia ( standard of care at Montefiore)
Group B: Intervention Group - DAA THA under spinal anesthesia and a preoperative supra-inguinal fascia iliac compartment block (S-FICB)
Blinding Procedures:
Hypothesis: The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block will decrease 24 hours post-surgery opioid requirements in patients undergoing elective direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty.
Target Population: Patients undergoing primary elective total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach
Recruitment methods: Participants who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study will be approached to participate in the study at the preoperative visit at the Orthopedic Surgeon's Office. Informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained during the preoperative visit.
The planned interventions and their timing:
Study Population
A. Patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach with neuraxial anesthesia
Participant Recruitment
Participants will be recruited during their preoperative visit to the office of the orthopedic surgery team performing the patient's surgery. At this visit, where the patient will be consented for the surgery itself, the orthopedic surgery team will present the opportunity to participate in this study during the perioperative period to patients who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. The informed consent document will be presented to the patient at this time for review. Contact information to the study's primary investigator and anesthesia associates will be provided on the informed consent documentation if the patient should require any further information about the study. If after reviewing the study details in the consent documentation, the patient is amenable to participating, they may provide consent by signing the consent form at the orthopedic surgeon's office free from coercion. Following enrollment in the study, patient data will be collected by the primary investigator's research team, stored securely, and all patient information and data will be de-identified prior to publication.
Risks/Benefits Anticipated risks of this study include the risks associated with the S-FICB procedure itself. These include infection, bleeding, injury to surrounding structures including nerves, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity which can occur if a large amount of local anesthetic is inadvertently injected intravascularly. This procedure is performed under sterile conditions, minimizing the risk of infection. In addition, patients who have local infection at the site of injection will be excluded as participants. The risks of major bleeding is rare for patients who do not have preexisting coagulopathies, and is low for patients who are on anticoagulation that has been discontinued an appropriate amount of time prior to surgery according to the American Society for Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) guidelines. Furthermore, the risk of nerve injury is greatly mitigated using ultrasound guidance in performing this type of nerve block where nerve tissue can be identified visually. Additionally, because this is a fascial plane block, the investigators do not aim to inject local anesthetic directly adjacent to nerve structures, minimizing risk of nerve injury or damage. The use of ultrasound guidance also mitigates the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity as blood vessels can be visualized and avoided. The practice of frequent aspiration during injection of local anesthetic also protects against this risk.
Another risk to participants of this study is the possible loss of confidentiality; however, the investigators have designed this study to include protocols for keeping patient information private. In addition, strict storage and de-identification of data will be used to protect patient information.
This study presents several possible benefits to participants and future patients who must undergo this surgery. It presents a potential avenue for decreasing opioid requirements in the perioperative period. Adverse events associated with opioids cause significant morbidity to the patient in the postoperative period. These include nausea, vomiting, sedation and dizziness that can lead to falls during attempted ambulation and inability to participate in physical therapy, and respiratory depression requiring intervention. All of these possible events can hinder recovery significantly and contribute to longer hospital lengths of stay.
Improved pain control overall is also a potential benefit to patients participating in this study. Decreasing the levels of pain experienced by patients is often instrumental in improving a patient's satisfaction with their surgery and in-hospital recovery. Decreased pain also makes it less challenging for a patient to participate fully in physical therapy, aiding in the recovery process after major orthopedic surgery.
If the results of this study support the use of the S-FICB showing improved outcomes for patients in the postoperative period, this peripheral nerve block can be more widely employed and incorporated as part of a multimodal perioperative opioid sparing pathway to improve outcomes for this patient population in the future.
The S-FICB is a relatively low-risk procedure, while the potential benefits to participants in this study, as well as future participants, is substantial.
Randomization On the day of surgery, an envelope containing the randomization code will be given to the regional team responsible for the study patient. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive S-FICB or standard of care using a 1:1 allocation ratio. --- BMI.--- A research associate who is not directly involved with the study procedures will maintain the randomization codes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo Comparator | DAA THA under spinal anesthesia ( standard of care at Montefiore) |
|
| Intervention Group | Active Comparator | DAA THA under spinal anesthesia and a preoperative supra-inguinal fascia iliac compartment block (S-FICB) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suprainguinal fascia ilica block | Procedure | Patients who have been randomized to Group B Intervention will receive a preoperative S-FICB using 35ml of 0.5% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance by the regional anesthesia block team once patient has been marked by surgeon. Sensory & motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, & ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. Patients who received a S-FICB in preop, approximately 15 minutes after the block, sensory & motor distribution of LFCN, FN, & ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia block team prior to going to the operating room. All patients, regardless of group allocation, will be followed by the acute pain service team on postoperative day one to assess sensory & motor distribution of LFCN, FN, & ON & adjustment of pain medication regimens. All patients will receive a call from a research assistant blinded to group allocation 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME) | Morphine Milligram Equivalent use in PACU | In PACU (1-2 hours postoperatively) |
| Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME) | Morphine Milligram Equivalent use post-op | 24 hours postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensory and Motor Distribution of LFCN, FN and ON | Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance. To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline. Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance. To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient refusal
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sofia steinberg, DO | Montefiore Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31945457 | Background | Kloppenburg M, Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Mar;28(3):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 13. | |
| 17403800 | Background | Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001733 | Bites and Stings |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011041 | Poisoning |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
On the day of surgery, a sealed envelope with group allocation (Group A- Control vs. Group B - Intervention) will be opened by a team member not involved with data collection.
A separate anesthesia team consisting of an anesthesiologist and certified nurse anesthetist will be responsible for the spinal anesthetic and monitored anesthesia care for both groups in the operating room A separate acute pain service team will follow the patients in both groups on postoperative day 1 and evaluate sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON for both groups A research assistant blinded to the allocation of both groups will collect data from the EMR for analysis. In addition, a research assistant blinded to the allocation of both groups will call patients via telephone 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey.
|
| Placebo | Other | The sensory and motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. |
|
| Preoperatively prior to surgery |
| Sensory and Motor Distribution of LFCN, FN and ON | Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance. To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline. Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance. To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline. | Postoperatively 24 hours after surgery |
| Length of Hospital Stay | To determine the average length of hospital stay (LOS) in Group A - control (did not receive the S-FICB) and Group B: Intervention (received S-FICB) | Up to 7 days |
| Patient satisfaction of acute postoperative pain management experience | Ordinal variables consisting of varying levels of satisfaction namely: Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Unsatisfied, and Very Unsatisfied | 24 hours post discharge |
| Pain scores in PACU | Numerical Pain rating, scale of 0-10 | PACU stay |
| Pain scores at 24 hours Postoperatively | Numerical Pain rating, scale of 0-10 | 24 hours postoperatively |
| Pain scores at 48 hours Postoperatively | Numerical Pain rating, scale of 0-10 | 48 hours |
| Emergency Department Readmissions postoperatively | Emergency department visit or readmission within 7 days following surgery. | 1-7 days postoperatively |
| 33680413 | Background | Zhang D, Pan L, Maimaitijuma T, Liu H, Wu H. Imaging Analysis of Prosthesis Angle after Hip Replacement with Direct Anterior Approach in Lateral Position. J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 17;2021:5540834. doi: 10.1155/2021/5540834. eCollection 2021. |
| 30643349 | Background | Galakatos GR. Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Mo Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;115(6):537-541. |
| 26827847 | Background | Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008. |
| 29049119 | Background | Kumar K, Kirksey MA, Duong S, Wu CL. A Review of Opioid-Sparing Modalities in Perioperative Pain Management: Methods to Decrease Opioid Use Postoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1749-1760. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002497. |
| 30092937 | Background | Bugada D, Bellini V, Lorini LF, Mariano ER. Update on Selective Regional Analgesia for Hip Surgery Patients. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Sep;36(3):403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Jul 11. |
| 34243719 | Background | Xia Q, Ding W, Lin C, Xia J, Xu Y, Jia M. Postoperative pain treatment with transmuscular quadratus lumborum block and fascia iliaca compartment block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01413-7. |
| 33907462 | Background | Nassar H, Hasanin A, Sewilam M, Ahmed H, Abo-Elsoud M, Taalab O, Rady A, Zoheir HA. Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Local Reg Anesth. 2021 Apr 20;14:67-74. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S308964. eCollection 2021. |
| 31272654 | Background | Desmet M, Balocco AL, Van Belleghem V. Fascia iliaca compartment blocks: Different techniques and review of the literature. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Apr 17. |
| 33456890 | Background | O'Reilly N, Desmet M, Kearns R. Fascia iliaca compartment block. BJA Educ. 2019 Jun;19(6):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24. No abstract available. |
| 2589650 | Background | Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg. 1989 Dec;69(6):705-13. |
| 19258967 | Background | Dolan J, Williams A, Murney E, Smith M, Kenny GN. Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block: a comparison with the loss of resistance technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;33(6):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.03.008. |
| 21401544 | Background | Hebbard P, Ivanusic J, Sha S. Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block: a cadaveric evaluation of a novel approach. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06628.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24. |
| 30798268 | Background | Vermeylen K, Desmet M, Leunen I, Soetens F, Neyrinck A, Carens D, Caerts B, Seynaeve P, Hadzic A, Van de Velde M. Supra-inguinal injection for fascia iliaca compartment block results in more consistent spread towards the lumbar plexus than an infra-inguinal injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 22:rapm-2018-100092. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100092. Online ahead of print. |
| 30683117 | Background | Zhang XY, Ma JB. The efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block for pain control after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1053-1. |
| 28059869 | Background | Desmet M, Vermeylen K, Van Herreweghe I, Carlier L, Soetens F, Lambrecht S, Croes K, Pottel H, Van de Velde M. A Longitudinal Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Reduces Morphine Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):327-333. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000543. |
| 32304500 | Background | Flevas DA, Tsantes AG, Mavrogenis AF. Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Revisited. JBJS Rev. 2020 Apr;8(4):e0144. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00144. |
| 26987082 | Background | Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Mar 18;65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1. |
| 27643835 | Background | Memtsoudis SG, Poeran J, Cozowicz C, Zubizarreta N, Ozbek U, Mazumdar M. The impact of peripheral nerve blocks on perioperative outcome in hip and knee arthroplasty-a population-based study. Pain. 2016 Oct;157(10):2341-2349. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000654. |