Control group, Counselling as usual

DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week. Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always". Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+. Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more. Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more

DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week. Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always". Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+. Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more. Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more

DASS-21 has twenty-one questions, and is a self-administered survey, measuring core symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress on a four-point Likert scale to indicate each symptom's frequency and intensity for the past week. Ratings begin at 0 as "Never" to 3 for "Almost Always". Depression is interpreted as "normal" when the score is between 0-4, mild at 5-6, moderate at 7-10, severe at 11-13 and extremely severe at 14+. Anxiety is categorised as normal between 0-3, mild at 4-5, moderate at 6-7, severe at 8-9 and extremely severe at 10 or more. Stress is indicated as "normal" between 0-7, "mild" at 8-9, "moderate" at 10-12, severe at 13-16 and extremely severe at 17 or more

This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population. subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items). Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales. On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale. Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale. Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.

This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population. subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items). Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales. On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale. Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale. Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.

This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population. subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items). Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales. On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale. Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale. Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.

This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population. subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items). Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales. On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale. Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale. Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.

This 19-item instrument was developed and tested by the IMH research team to assess the six dimensions of positive mental health in Singapore's multi-ethnic population. subscales consist of General Coping (2-items), Emotional support (3-items), Spirituality (4-items), Interpersonal skills (3-items), Personal Growth & Autonomy (4-items), Global affect (3-items). Participants will select on a scale of 1 (not at all like me) to 6 (exactly like me) for the first five subscales. On the 6th subscale, participants indicate how frequently they felt over the past month on a five-point response scale. Scores are added over each subscale and divided by the number of items in that subscale. Higher subscale scores indicate a higher PMH.

12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five.

In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion.

12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five.

In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion.

12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five.

In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion.

12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five.

In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion.

12-item measure, six domains: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. There are 2-items for each domain. Participants indicate on each item, in response to, "How I typically act towards myself in difficult times", from the 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 being "almost never" to 5 being "almost always". subscales calculate scores to identify domains to improve. An overall score will also be calculated, with the average score being three and the cut off being five.

In the domains of self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification, scores higher than 3 indicates lesser self-compassion. In self-kindness, common humanity and mindfulness, scores above 3 indicate higher self-compassion.

4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived acceptability. Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". The score is calculated by averaging the response.

4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived acceptability. Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". The score is calculated by averaging the response.

4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived appropriateness. Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". The score is calculated by averaging the response.

4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived appropriateness. Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". The score is calculated by averaging the response.

4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived feasibility of treatment. Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". The score is calculated by averaging the response.

4-item psychometric measure used to assess perceived feasibility of treatment. Participants indicate on the five-point Likert scale from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". The score is calculated by averaging the response.