Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Opioids are currently ranked as third-line agents for neuropathic pain (NP) treatment. The opioids more frequently tested for NP were tramadol, oxycodone and morphine. In the present study test the safety and effectiveness of methadone in patients with NP who remain symptomatic despite the use of first and second line drugs in a placebo-controlled randomized approach.
Background: neuropathic pain (NP) is highly refractory and it is estimated that about 40% of patients remain symptomatic despite the use of first and second line drugs. Opioids are currently ranked as third-line agents for NP treatment. The opioids more frequently tested for NP were tramadol, oxycodone and morphine. In the present study test the effectiveness and safety of methadone, an opioid agonist and glutamate n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist in patients with NP who remain symptomatic despite the use of first and second line drugs in a placebo-controlled randomized approach.
Patients and Methods: this is a randomized, placebo controlled superiority trial including 80 subjects, aged between 18 and 85 years, with NP, that will be randomized to receive methadone or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Enrollment will take place at the Pain Center of the University of São Paulo and it will include patients from primary care clinics from an area of 2 million people addressed to specialized care at a referral center.
Expected results: the study hypothesis is that methadone is superior to placebo and it is safe to use that medication in patients with neuropathic pain.
Recruitment time will be extended by 12 months due to dropouts related to the Covid pandemic. We have had dropouts due to a few patients developing covid and also due to patients having fear to become infected while attending hospital visits
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| methadone | Experimental | In this arm patients will take methadone 5mg |
|
| placebo | Placebo Comparator | In this arm patients will take placebo tablets (the same number, color and physical aspects as the methadone tablets). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| methadone tablets | Drug | The intervention with the active drug (methadone) will start with the dose of 1 tablet (5 mg) twice a day (every 12 hours) and titrated on subsequent visits up to the maximum dose of 6 tablets a day (totaling 30 mg divided into 2 daily doses to facilitate therapeutic adherence). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity change from baseline, assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) | To evaluate the analgesic effect of methadone (number of patients with ≥ 30% pain intensity change from baseline) compared to placebo in patients with neuropathic pain (NP) of different etiologies. The impact on the average change in the intensity of NP (baseline) will be evaluated, with the main objective being a higher number of responders in the methadone at study completion compared to the placebo group. Responder is defined as pain intensity reduction greater than or equal to 30% compared to the baseline intensity of NP. It will be measured according to a visual analogue scale (VAS), 100 mm long, anchored by two verbal descriptors (0 mm being the total absence of pain and 100 mm being the worst imaginable pain). The measurement of the average change in the intensity of NP (baseline) will be performed by comparing the value on the first visit (day 0) with the value on the final visit (day 56). | 0 and 56 days |
| Incidence of Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events assessed by a questionnaire | The Incidence of Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events will be assessed by measuring the number of participants who experience Serious Adverse Events with the use of methadone or placebo. The search for the adverse events will be done with a questionnaire containing the main adverse events previously described in the medical literature and in the manufacturer's label (methadone). In addition, unexpected adverse events will also be described in detail and reported to the responsible institution. The definition of a serious treatment adverse event will be made in accordance with the rules of the National System of Notifications for Health Surveillance-NOTIVISA. Each serious adverse event will be described in detail and notified to the responsible institution.The comparison between the incidence of Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events will be made between the groups (methadone and placebo) at the end of the study. | 56 days |
| Incidence of methadone addiction/misuse or withdrawal syndrome assessed by a prespecified questionnaire | The incidence of methadone addiction/misuse or withdrawal syndrome will be assessed by a prespecified questionnaire, containing eight clinical characteristics that may be related to the methadone addition/misuse or withdrawal syndromes. If one or more of those 8 characteristics listed in the questionnaire are present, an immediate communication will be made to the assistant physician (for diagnostic confirmation and referral to multidisciplinary treatment), as well as the exclusion of the individual from the study (after discussion with the research coordinators). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of drop-outs due to Non-Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events assessed by a questionnaire | The incidence of Non-Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events will be assessed (at the end of the study) measuring the proportion of participants who experienced non-serious adverse events in each study group and the proportion of drop-out losses caused by such effects.The search for the adverse events will be done with a questionnaire containing the main adverse events previously described in the medical literature and in the manufacturer's label (methadone). In addition, unexpected adverse events will also be described in detail and reported to the responsible institution. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in sleep quality, assessed by The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problem Index II (SPI II) | It will be investigated whether there is a correlation between the use of Methadone and the improvement of sleep quality in relation to placebo. The MOS questionnaire, frequently used in chronic pain syndromes, is composed of 12 questions about the main aspects of sleep, evaluated through a categorical scale (from 1: permanent, to 6: never). The nine items of the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problem Index II (SPI II) are part of the 12-item Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, with a final score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more sleep problems. The main target would be to reduce the SPI II score by at least 10 points with the use of methadone. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel C. de Andrade, PhD | University of Sao Paulo | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of São Paulo | São Paulo | 05403-000 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39432734 | Derived | Pentiado Junior JAM, Barbosa MM, Kubota GT, Martins PN, Moreira LI, Fernandes AM, da Silva VA, Junior JR, Yeng LT, Teixeira MJ, Ciampi de Andrade D. METHA-NeP: effectiveness and safety of methadone for neuropathic pain: a controlled randomized trial. Pain. 2025 Mar 1;166(3):557-570. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003413. Epub 2024 Oct 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
The complete IPD will be shared with other authors who wish to use it in individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Other specific situations will be discussed on a case-by-case basis.
The IPD will be available after the estimated study completion time (August/2021) and for five years.
The complete IPD will be sent by e-mail after other researchers request it for use in individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Other specific situations will be discussed on a case-by-case basis.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008691 | Methadone |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007659 | Ketones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | In this arm patients will take placebo tablets (the same number, color and physical aspects as the methadone tablets). |
|
| 56 days |
| 56 days |
| 56 days |
| Improvement in mood and anxiety symptoms, assessed by The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | It will be evaluated whether there is a correlation between the use of Methadone and the improvement of symptoms of Depression and/or Anxiety (in those patients who may have these symptoms prior to the beginning of the study) in relation to placebo. The HADS questionnaire allows assessing, over a week, on a scale from 0 to 3, the intensity of symptoms of anxiety or depression. It consists of 7 questions to assess anxiety and 7 questions to assess depression, each one (depression or anxiety) being evaluated on a maximum scale of 21 points. A score equal to or greater than 8 on the HADS for either anxiety or depression suggests a significant impact. | 56 days |
| Improvement in quality of life, assessed by The Short-Form 6 dimensions Questionnaire (SF-6D) | It will be researched if there is a correlation between the use of Methadone and the improvement in the quality of life of patients in relation to placebo. The SF-6D is a quality of life self-assessment questionnaire that allows for obtaining measures of preference for health states. It has 6 health dimensions (functional capacity, physical and emotional aspects, social aspects, pain, mental health and vitality) with 4-6 levels each. The SF-6D score, which ranges from 0 to 1, represents the strength of an individual's preference for a particular health state, on a scale where 0 is equal to the worst health state and 1 means the best health state. The total SF-6D value is the summation of 6 dimensions scoring. | 56 days |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |