Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE), there is a lack of knowledge regarding optimal treatment. The present study was designed to assess the benefit of treatment with positive expiratory pressure device (PEP-device) compared to spontaneous recovery in patients with SIPE without hypoxia in the out-of-hospital environment.
Swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) is an unusual condition affecting otherwise healthy swimmers. SIPE is characterized by acute onset of dyspnea and cough, excessive sputum and occasionally hemoptysis when swimming in open water. The condition usually resolves spontaneously within 48 hours, but may result in serious illness and require emergency care. Case reports describe acute treatment with or without oxygen in combination with diuretics, beta-agonist-inhalation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Evidence for optimal treatment strategy is lacking. Oxygen treatment might not be appropriate for patients with SIPE presenting without hypoxia. It is unknown if positive airway pressure accelerates recovery in SIPE.
This study intends to determine whether treatment with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) applied by PEP-device accelerates increase of oxygen saturation compared to spontaneous recovery in patients presenting with SIPE without hypoxia. The aim is to treat patients on site without involving hospital care. We study a large cohort of approximately 12 000 swimmers during Vansbrosimningen, Sweden's biggest annual open water event with a yearly incidence of SIPE about 0,4%.
Adult patients clinically diagnosed with SIPE and oxygen saturation ≥92% are randomly assigned to 2 groups: (1) PEP-device for 20 minutes or (2) control group with spontaneous recovery without active treatment for 20 minutes. Assessment with outcome measures is taken 10 minutes after intervention/control. Primary endpoint: oxygen saturation (%) by pulse oxymetry.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEP-device | Experimental | Positive expiratory pressure device: continuous treatment with PEP-device breathing air for 20 minutes followed by 10 minutes rest and assessment. Inspiration through nose/mouth, expiration through device. |
|
| spontaneous recovery | No Intervention | Control group: Resting and breathing air for 20 + 10 minutes. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP-device | Device | PEP-device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute peripheral oxygen saturation (%) after treatment | Peripheral oxygen saturation % (continuous variable) measured by peripheral pulse oximetry | after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in absolute peripheral oxygen saturation (%) before and after treatment | Change in peripheral oxygen saturation % (continuous variable) measured by pulse oximetry before and after treatment | change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Recovery (yes/no) after treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Hårdstedt, MD/PhD | Contact | 46-738089464 | maria.hardstedt@regiondalarna.se |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center of Clinical Research Dalarna | Recruiting | Falun | 79182 | Sweden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011654 | Pulmonary Edema |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recovery, defined by "peripheral oxygen saturation >95% after treatment" or no recovery, defined by "peripheral oxygen saturation ≤95% after treatment" |
| after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Interstitial syndrome assessed by lung ultrasound (yes/no) after treatment | Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Bilateral or unilateral presence of two or more positive regions define positive interstitial syndrome | after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound after treatment | Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Assessment of the total number of positive regions. | after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Change in absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound before and after treatment | Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Assessment of the total number of positive regions. Change in absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound before and after treatment | change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Change in patient reported outcome measures before and after treatment | Six different patient reported outcome measures assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS; min-max 0-10): cough, sputum, air hunger, breathing effort, tightness in chest, anxiousness. The patients will assess symptoms prior to and after treatment | change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest |
| Admission to hospital (yes/no) | Admission to hospital within or after a maximal treatment time of 1 hour | 1 hour |
| Total treatment time | Total treatment time until oxygen saturation ≥96% is reached | 1 hour |