Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Rijnstate Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objective: To explore the association between spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis, and post-stenosis) and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Secondary, to assess the association between ultrasound elastography and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Furthermore, to assess the association between blood flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress (WSS), vector complexity and vorticity, and plaque vulnerability. To evaluate the hemodynamic consequences of a CEA. Last, to explore whether the presence of circulating biomarkers is related to the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound).
Study design: A multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study in a total of 70 patients.
Study population: Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.
Intervention (observational): A carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care. The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure. Besides, clinical parameters will be subtracted from electronic health record or, if missing, anamnestically collected from the patient.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, maximum stenosis and post-stenosis), measured by ultrafast ultrasound measurements, and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants | Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carotid ultrasound | Diagnostic Test | Carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assocation between 2D blood flow velocities and plaque vulnerability | Explore the association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis and post-stenosis) and atherosclerotic carotid plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining. | Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Association strain and plaque vulnerability | Association between strain parameters and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining. | Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA |
| Association shear wave elastography measures and plaque vulnerability |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rijnstate Hospital | Arnhem | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016893 | Carotid Stenosis |
| D058226 | Plaque, Atherosclerotic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002340 | Carotid Artery Diseases |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000092262 | Ultrasonography, Carotid Arteries |
| D012149 | Restraint, Physical |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Atherosclerotic plaque carotid artery
|
| Biospecimen collection and examination | Other | The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability. |
|
| Blood sample collection | Other | In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care. |
|
Association between shear wave parameters and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining. (only Radboudumc) |
| Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA |
| Association blood flow-related parameters and plaque vulnerability | Association between blood flow-related parameters, including WSS, vector complexity and vorticity and carotid plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining. | Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA |
| Comparison predictive value for plaque vulnerability ultrafast imaging techniques vs clinically-used measurements | Comparison between the predictive value for plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) of ultrafast imaging techniques (i.e. flow, strain and shear wave elastography) with that of clinically-used duplex measurements. | Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA |
| Status 2D blood flow velocity profiles and flow-related parameters prior- and post-CEA | Status of 2D blood flow velocity profiles and flow-related parameters (WSS, vector complexity and vorticity) prior- and post-CEA. | Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA and 6 weeks after CEA |
| Association circulating inflammatory cytokines and plaque vulnerability | Association between the presence of circulating inflammatory cytokines and the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound) | Time Frame: During CEA |
| Radboud university medical center | Nijmegen | Netherlands |
|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D032763 |
| Behavior Control |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D007103 | Immobilization |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |