Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-A02451-40 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of Gana V, a Poly L-lactic acid filler for the aesthetic treatment of nasolabial folds, in comparison with Sculptra.
A screening visit will allow to inform and preselect the participants.
On D0, baseline scoring, fringe projection acquisitions and photographs will be done before injection. Eligible participants will receive a first injection of the two products according to the randomization list. Immediately after injection, injector's treatment satisfaction will be collected. Investigator evaluator will collect Adverse Events (AEs) and Injection Site Reactions (ISRs) immediately after injection.
A month and a half after initial injection (M11/2), clinical scoring, fringe projection acquisitions and photographs will be done before touch-up (if applicable). Participant's treatment satisfaction and injector's treatment satisfaction (if applicable) will be collected. A touch-up injection will be made if necessary, according to injector and participant opinion. Investigator evaluator will collect AEs and ISRs before and after touch-up if applicable.
Three (M3), six (M6), nine (M9), twelve (M12), eighteen (M18) and twenty-four (M24) months after initial injection, clinical scoring, fringe projection acquisitions and photographs will be done. Participant's treatment satisfaction will be collected. Investigator evaluator will collect AEs and ISRs
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gana V versus Sculptra | Experimental | Participants will receive both Gana V and Sculptra: one in each nasolabial folds |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gana V® | Device | Injection in the deep dermis and subcutaneous layer of the nasolabial fold on D0 (initial injection) and 1 month and a half after initial injection if necessary (optional touch-up). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Nasolabial Folds Severity Score on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) 6 Months After Treatment | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity. The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Change of grades was calculated as the value at 6 months minus the value at baseline. To observe an improvement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles, a decrease of the mean score was expected. | Baseline and Month 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Nasolabial Folds Severity Score on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity. The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Change of grades was calculated as the value at month X minus the value at baseline. To observe an improvement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles, a decrease of the mean score was expected. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
Subject with a scar, moles, pigment disorders or anything on the face which might interfere with the evaluation.
Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or who is under guardianship.
Subject in a social or sanitary establishment
Subject participation to another research on human beings or who is in an exclusion period of one.
Subject having received 4500 euros indemnities for participation in research involving human beings in the 12 previous months, including participation in the present study.
Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the investigator's judgment.
Subject suffering from a severe or progressive disease or any other pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of the study results.
Subject with known history of or suffering from autoimmune disease and/or immune deficiency.
Subject suffering from inflammatory and/or infectious cutaneous disorders in or near the studied zones (e.g. acne, mycosis, papilloma, chronic eczema, atopic dermatitis…). Subject with labial herpes in the last 2 years is not eligible even if asymptomatic at time of screening visit.
Subject with an abscess, unhealed wound, or a cancerous or precancerous lesion on the studied zone.
Subject prone to develop inflammatory skin conditions or having tendency to bleeding disorders.
Subject with a tendency to develop keloids or hypertrophic scarring.
Subject having history of allergy or anaphylactic shock including hypersensitivity to Poly-l-lactic acid, to lidocaine or to one of the components of the tested devices or antiseptic solution.
Subject having received treatment with a laser, a dermabrasion, a surgery, a deep chemical peeling or other ablative procedure on the face within the past 12 months prior to screening visit.
Subject having received injection with a resorbable filling product in the face area within the past 12 months prior to screening visit.
Subject having received at any time injection with a slowly resorbable filling product (polylactic acid, calcium hydroxyapatite, combinations of hyaluronic acid (HA) and hypromellose, HA and dextran microbeads or HA and TriCalcium Phosphate (TCP), …) or with a non-resorbable filling product (polyacrylamide, silicone, combination of methacrylic polymers and collagen, polymer particles, …) on the face.
Subject having received at any time a treatment with tensor threads on the face.
Subject having started or changed her oral contraceptive or any other hormonal treatment during 12 weeks prior to screening visit.
Subject using medication such as aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (ibuprofen, naproxen, …), antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants or other substances known to prolong bleeding time within 1 week prior to injection visits.
Subject undergoing a topical treatment on the test area or a systemic treatment:
Intensive exposure to sunlight or UV-rays within the previous month before and after injection visits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Patricia Morel, Doctor | Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan | Villeurbanne | 69100 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40897963 | Derived | Kim H, Kim HJ, Han WY, Yon DK. Final Report on the Safety and Efficacy of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Filler (Gana V) Injection for the Correction of Nasolabial Fold: A Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized, Split-Face Controlled Trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026 Jan;50(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05190-3. Epub 2025 Sep 2. | |
| 37626137 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
4 subjects were enrolled but not randomized in the study due to consent withdrawal or because they were lost to follow-up
The clinical investigation was initiated on 7 March 2022 (first subject first visit). Subjects were recruited from one investigational center, Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan centre in Villeurbanne, France.The last subject was screened on 4 May 2022, and the recruitment period lasted 58 days.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Gana V | Participants received Gana V in one nasolabial fold (as per randomization list-split face design).1ml maximum of product could be used at the initial visit (D0) and 1ml maximum could be used 1 month and a half after the initial visit (touch-up not mandatory). |
| FG001 | Sculptra |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 27, 2022 |
Not provided
All participants will receive both fillers
Not provided
Not provided
Participants and investigators assessors will not know which filler was used on each side of the face (hemi-face design)
Not provided
| Sculptra® | Device | Injection in the deep dermis and subcutaneous layer of the nasolabial fold on D0 (initial injection) and 1 month and a half after initial injection if necessary (optional touch-up). |
|
| Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| WSRS Responders Rate | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity. The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Responders rate = percentage of participants with an improvement of at least one grade in WSRS compared to baseline score. An improvement represents a decrease in WSRS (from grade 5 to grade 4 for instance) | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Responder Rate | Percentage of participants with an improvement on GAIS. A responder is defined as a subject having "Improved", "Much improved" or "Very much improved" score according to GAIS. | Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Folds Average Depth (mm) | The average depth of the nasolabial folds wrinkles was calculated using a fringe projection system. An increase of the mean value means a positive outcome. Change was calculated as the value at each follow-up visit minus the value at baseline | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Folds Volume | The volume of the nasolabial folds wrinkles was calculated using a fringe projection system. A decrease of the volume means a positive outcome. | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| Proportion of Satisfied Participants | Percentage of participants with positive answers to an internal questionnaire | Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| Injector Satisfaction | Percentage of participants | After initial injection (Day 0) and touch-up if applicable (Month 1^1/2) |
| Collection of Injection Site Reactions | Proportion of subjects presenting at least one ISR of any severity | Day 0, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
| Collection of Adverse Events | Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Number of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) Proportion of subjects with at least one AE Proportion of subject with at least one ADE | Day 0 to Month 24 |
| Han WY, Kim HJ, Kwon R, Kang SM, Yon DK. Safety and Efficacy of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Filler (Gana V vs. Sculptra) Injection for Correction of the Nasolabial Fold: A Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized, Split-Face Controlled Trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):1796-1805. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03600-y. Epub 2023 Aug 25. |
Participants received Sculptra in the other nasolabial fold (as per randomization list-split face design). 1ml maximum of product could be used at the initial visit (D0) and 1ml maximum could be used 1 month and a half after the initial visit (touch-up not mandatory). |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Gana V Versus Sculptra | Participants received both Gana V and Sculptra: one in each nasolabial folds |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Nasolabial Folds Severity Score on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) 6 Months After Treatment | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity. The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Change of grades was calculated as the value at 6 months minus the value at baseline. To observe an improvement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles, a decrease of the mean score was expected. | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline and Month 6 | Nasolabial fold | Nasolabial fold |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Nasolabial Folds Severity Score on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity. The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Change of grades was calculated as the value at month X minus the value at baseline. To observe an improvement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles, a decrease of the mean score was expected. | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 | Nasolabial fold | Nasolabial fold |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | WSRS Responders Rate | The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale is a scale for measurement of the nasolabial folds wrinkles severity. The scale ranges from Grade 1 (absent-better outcome) to Grade 5 (extreme-worse outcome) Responders rate = percentage of participants with an improvement of at least one grade in WSRS compared to baseline score. An improvement represents a decrease in WSRS (from grade 5 to grade 4 for instance) | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Responder Rate | Percentage of participants with an improvement on GAIS. A responder is defined as a subject having "Improved", "Much improved" or "Very much improved" score according to GAIS. | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Folds Average Depth (mm) | The average depth of the nasolabial folds wrinkles was calculated using a fringe projection system. An increase of the mean value means a positive outcome. Change was calculated as the value at each follow-up visit minus the value at baseline | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 | Nasolabial fold | Nasolabial fold |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Folds Volume | The volume of the nasolabial folds wrinkles was calculated using a fringe projection system. A decrease of the volume means a positive outcome. | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm3 | Baseline, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 | Nasolabial fold | Nasolabial fold |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Satisfied Participants | Percentage of participants with positive answers to an internal questionnaire | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Injector Satisfaction | Percentage of participants | Intent To Treat population - any subject included and randomized in the study with at least a post-basal value | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After initial injection (Day 0) and touch-up if applicable (Month 1^1/2) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Collection of Injection Site Reactions | Proportion of subjects presenting at least one ISR of any severity | Safety population - any subject having used the investigational device | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 0, Month 1^1/2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18 and Month 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Collection of Adverse Events | Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Number of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) Proportion of subjects with at least one AE Proportion of subject with at least one ADE | Safety population - any subject having used the investigational device | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 to Month 24 | Nasolabial fold | Nasolabial fold |
|
|
24 months
Definitions from MDCG were used as the study was done on a medical device
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Gana V | All nasolabial fold who received injection with Gana V® | 0 | 55 | 1 | 55 | 42 | 55 |
| EG001 | Sculptra | All nasolabial fold who received injection with Sculptra® | 0 | 55 | 1 | 55 | 42 | 55 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye disorder | Eye disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Glaucoma / conjunctivitis |
| |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Gastroenteritis, bloating, reflux |
| |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Muskulokeletal disorders | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache / Migraine | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia / Tracheitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acne, seborrheic dermatitis, burn | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florence REBER | Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan | 0472823656 | +33 | Florence.Reber@cpt.eurofinseu.com |
| Nov 29, 2024 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
| Nasolabial fold |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nasolabial fold |
|
|
| Nasolabial fold |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nasolabial fold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
| Not responder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Not satisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| Satisfied |
|
| Somewhat satisfied |
|
| Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
| Dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|
| At least one sign |
|