CompletedObservationalLast updated Jan 27, 2022

Single-incision Sling vs Urethral Bulking During Prolapse Surgery for Occult Stress Incontinence

A Cohort Observational Study Comparing the Outcomes of Single-incision Sling vs Urethral Bulking During Prolapse Surgery for Occult Stress Incontinence

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05210738
Lead Sponsor: The Christ HospitalOTHER
Brief Summary: The aim is to compare outcomes of two different procedures to prevent occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients who are having pelvic organ prolapse surgeries
Study Type: Observational

Status

Overall Status: Completed
Start Date: Jan 1, 2019Actual
Primary Completion Date: Jun 1, 2021Actual
Completion Date: Jun 1, 2021Actual

Study Record Dates

First Submitted: Jan 14, 2022
First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Jan 14, 2022
First Posted: Jan 27, 2022Actual
Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Jan 14, 2022
Last Update Posted: Jan 27, 2022Actual
Last Verified: Jan 2022

NCT06480227Recruiting

Trial of Transurethral Bulking Agent Injection Versus Single-Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT01784588Completed

Post Market Study Of Single Incision Sling Versus Transobturator Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT03520114Completed

Retropubic vs. Single-Incision Mid-Urethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT04071288Completed

Burch Colposuspension and Mid-urethral Sling Operations

NCT04775186Unknown status

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Midurethral Sling for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT02506309Completed

Trans-obturator Mid-urethral Sling and the Single-incision Sling in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence