8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

11-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

7-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

10-item scale to assess parent-child communication completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

7-item scales to assess children being caught in the middle between parents completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 4. High score is worse outcome.

7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by parents. The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). High score is worse outcome.

7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by children. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

6-item scale assessing child internalizing problems as reported by parents. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome..

Total of all reporting groups

Measure Analysis Population Description: The unit of analysis (participants) reflects the age of parents who were assessed in the participating families in the eNBP (N = 81) and Wait list control (N = 50) conditions

Child gender reported by parents. Parents reported sex on one randomly selected index child per family.

Gender information for the target child across 131 families was reported by the parents.

Parent ethnicity reported by parent (child ethnicity question was not collected).

Parent ethnicity information by parent report (child ethnicity info was not collected).

Parent race reported by parents (child race information was not collected).

Parent race information by parent report (child ethnicity info was not collected).

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 85 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 124 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Measure Analysis Population Description: Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 119 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 99 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 123 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 101 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 122 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 96 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 125 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 94 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 124 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 93 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 130 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 92 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of normative sample (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. The norms are based on a US national sample.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 126 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of normative sample (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. The norms are based on a US national sample.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 97 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of normative sample (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. The norms are based on a US national sample.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 123 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of normative sample (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. The norms are based on a US national sample.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 94 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2. The score reported is the mean item score. A high score is a better outcome.

Although 131 parents participated in the baseline assessment, only 129 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2 (range 0-10). The score reported is the mean total score. A higher score is a better outcome.

Although 102 children between ages 11 and 18 participated in the baseline assessment, only 101 had enough data for their scores on this measure to be included.

Parents in the waitlist-control condition were told that they would have access to the eNBP 12 weeks after they completed the pre-test. Twelve weeks after assignment to condition, parents and children were sent links to the posttest

15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by parents. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome

16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.

16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

11-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

7-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

10-item scale to assess parent-child communication completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.

7-item scales to assess children being caught in the middle between parents completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 4. High score is worse outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by parents. The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). High score is worse outcome.

7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by children. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

6-item scale assessing child internalizing problems as reported by parents. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.

The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome..

5-item scale assessing child prosocial skills as reported by parents. Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2. The score reported is the mean item score. A high score is a better outcome.

Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2 (range 0-10). The score reported is the mean of the total scores. A higher score is a better outcome.

Only children between ages 10 and 18 who were interested and whose parents gave permission completed the assessments (N=102).

Parents in the waitlist-control condition were told that they would have access to the eNBP 12 weeks after they completed the pre-test. Twelve weeks after assignment to condition, parents and children were sent links to the posttest