Change from baseline at 1 month after outpatient treatment.

Change from baseline at 3 months after outpatient treatment.

Change from baseline treatment retention versus drop out at 6 months after treatment at follow-up time point.

• Symptom CheckList-90 item-Revised. Each dimension has a total score ranging from 0 to 4, where a higher score means higher severity of the symptom.
• The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Every sub-scale has a total score, ranging from 20 to 80, with higher scores correlating with greater anxiety.
• Beck's Depression Inventory. This instrument has a total score ranging from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of the symptoms.
• Severity of Dependence Scale. This questionnaire provides a total score ranging from 0 to 15, with a higher score indicating grater dependence.
• Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment. The scale has a total score ranging from 0 to 126, where a higher score indicates more severity of the withdrawal symptoms.
• Weiss Cocaine Craving Scale. The questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0 to 45 where a higher score indicates more severity of craving symptomatology.
• Weight is measured in kilograms (Kg)
• Heigh is measured in meters (m)

• Symptom CheckList-90 item-Revised. Each dimension has a total score ranging from 0 to 4, where a higher score means higher severity of the symptom.
• The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Every sub-scale has a total score, ranging from 20 to 80, with higher scores correlating with greater anxiety.
• Beck's Depression Inventory. This instrument has a total score ranging from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of the symptoms.
• Severity of Dependence Scale. This questionnaire provides a total score ranging from 0 to 15, with a higher score indicating grater dependence.
• Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment. The scale has a total score ranging from 0 to 126, where a higher score indicates more severity of the withdrawal symptoms.
• Weiss Cocaine Craving Scale. The questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0 to 45 where a higher score indicates more severity of craving symptomatology.
• Weight is measured in kilograms (Kg)
• Heigh is measured in meters (m)

• Symptom CheckList-90 item-Revised. Each dimension has a total score ranging from 0 to 4, where a higher score means higher severity of the symptom.
• Weiss Cocaine Craving Scale. The questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0 to 45 where a higher score indicates more severity of craving symptomatology.
• Weight is measured in kilograms (Kg)
• Heigh is measured in meters (m)

• Symptom CheckList-90 item-Revised. Each dimension has a total score ranging from 0 to 4, where a higher score means higher severity of the symptom.
• Weiss Cocaine Craving Scale. The questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0 to 45 where a higher score indicates more severity of craving symptomatology.
• Weight is measured in kilograms (Kg)
• Heigh is measured in meters (m)

• Symptom CheckList-90 item-Revised. Each dimension has a total score ranging from 0 to 4, where a higher score means higher severity of the symptom.
• Weiss Cocaine Craving Scale. The questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0 to 45 where a higher score indicates more severity of craving symptomatology.
• Weight is measured in kilograms (Kg)
• Heigh is measured in meters (m)

• South Oaks Gambling Screen. The questionnaire consists of 20 items that lead to a total score, ranging from 0 to 20. As higher is the total score, higher is the probability of pathological gambling.
• Yale Food Addiction Scale 2. Each item is answered using a 7-point likert scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 7 (always). If the criterion is met, then it is scored as 1. If the score is 0 it means that the criterion has not been met. As more criteria are met, greater is the severity of food addiction.
• Internet Gambling Disorder (IGM) DSM-5 criteria. As more items are answered as yes, higher is the severity of the internet addiction.
• Hypersexual Behavior Inventory. Each item is answered using a 5-point likert scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). There are 3 factors and each factor has a total score, so as higher is the score in each factor, higher is the hypersexual behaviour.

• South Oaks Gambling Screen. The questionnaire consists of 20 items that lead to a total score, ranging from 0 to 20. As higher is the total score, higher is the probability of pathological gambling.
• Yale Food Addiction Scale 2. Each item is answered using a 7-point likert scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 7 (always). If the criterion is met, then it is scored as 1. If the score is 0 it means that the criterion has not been met. As more criteria are met, greater is the severity of food addiction.
• Internet Gambling Disorder (IGM) DSM-5 criteria. As more items are answered as yes, higher is the severity of the internet addiction.
• Hypersexual Behavior Inventory. Each item is answered using a 5-point likert scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). There are 3 factors and each factor has a total score, so as higher is the score in each factor, higher is the hypersexual behaviour.

• Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire. The score of each scale ranges from 0 to 24, with a greater score indicating more sensitivity to punishment or to reward.
• UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale. Items are answered using a 4-point likert scale. Each sub-scale has a total score, where high values indicate higher levels of impulsivity.
• Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Each item is answered using a 5-point likert scale, and each sub-scale has a total score. As higher is the score in the sub-scale, there are more difficulties in emotional regulation.
• Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Items are answered using a 7-point likert scale. Each sub-scale has a total score, where a higher value indicates a greater use of that emotion regulation strategy.
• Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Each item is answered using a 5-point likert scale. There are 8 sub-scales where higher scores indicate higher levels of positive awareness.

• UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale. Items are answered using a 4-point likert scale. Each sub-scale has a total score, where high values indicate higher levels of impulsivity.
• Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Each item is answered using a 5-point likert scale, and each sub-scale has a total score. As higher is the score in the sub-scale, there are more difficulties in emotional regulation.
• Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Items are answered using a 7-point likert scale. Each sub-scale has a total score, where a higher value indicates a greater use of that emotion regulation strategy.

• UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale. Items are answered using a 4-point likert scale. Each sub-scale has a total score, where high values indicate higher levels of impulsivity.
• Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Each item is answered using a 5-point likert scale, and each sub-scale has a total score. As higher is the score in the sub-scale, there are more difficulties in emotional regulation.
• Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Items are answered using a 7-point likert scale. Each sub-scale has a total score, where a higher value indicates a greater use of that emotion regulation strategy.