A Randomized, Parallel, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Vascular Response of Orsiro vs. Xience Drug Eluting Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
A Randomized, Parallel, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Vascular Response of Orsiro vs. Xience Drug Eluting Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
This study aims to compare vessel response and clinical outcomes of a biodegradable-polymer, ultra-thin strut, drug-eluting stent (Orsiro, Biotronik) and a durable-polymer, thin-strut, drug-eluting stent (Xience, Abbott) for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with two-stent double-kissing crush technique. How the differences in stent platforms affect vessel healing process will be examined by optical coherence tomography.
Patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions (Medina [1, 1, 1] or [0, 1, 1]) will be enrolled and randomized to undergo two-stent double kissing crush technique with Orsiro or Xience. Pre-intervention and post-stenting optical coherence tomography will be performed during the index procedure. Another parallel prospective registry will enroll patients with bifurcation lesions treated with provisional one-stent strategy. All subjects will receive coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography follow-up at 3 and 12 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
n12374@cgmh.org.tw886-3-3281200 ext. 8162
chijenformosa@gmail.com886-3-3281200 ext. 8162