Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, prospective open-label extension study of noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation (NPNS) with the NTX100 Neuromodulation System for patients with medication-refractory moderate- severe primary RLS
This is an extension study only inviting subjects who have previously completed the RESTFUL Study (NCT04874155).
Each study subject is enrolled into one of the following Arms:
Arm 1 (Direct Roll-Over Extension): 24-week open-label NPNS followed by 8-weeks of no treatment, no delay after completion of the RESTFUL Study
Arm 2 (Control Group): 24-weeks of no treatment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Direct Roll-Over Extension | Active Comparator | 24-wks of Active neurostimulation - Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver active stimulation; followed by 8-wks of No Intervention |
|
| Arm 2 - Control Group | No Intervention | 24-wks of No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTX100 Neuromodulation System | Device | Active Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects for Which the Clinician Reported "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale in Treatment Group (Arm 1) Relative to Baseline. | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the investigator-rated 7-point CGI-I scale. The outcomes were also evaluated as Treatment Group (Arm 1) at 24 weeks related to Control Group (Arm 2) at 24 weeks. The primary outcome, however, is the measure relative to baseline. | Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects That Report "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale in the Treatment Group (Arm 1) Relative to Baseline. | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale in the Treatment Group (Arm 1) Relative to Baseline. Note that the Responder Rate was be calculated relative to baseline for the endpoint but was also be calculated relative to the value for the control group at Week 24. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has active medical device implant anywhere in the body (including but not limited to pacemakers, spinal cord stimulators, deep brain stimulators) or metal implant at the site of study device electrode application.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has been diagnosed with one of the following conditions:
Subject has moderate or severe cognitive disorder or mental illness.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has known allergy to device materials, electrode gel, polyurethane foam, or lycra (or severe previous reaction to medical adhesives or bandages).
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has severe edema affecting lower legs.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has any of the following at or near the location of device application.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject is on dialysis or anticipated to start dialysis while participating in the study.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has received another investigational device or drug within 30 days before study entry, is planning to receive another investigational device or drug during the study, or is planning to change RLS medications during the study.
Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with study requirements.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject is pregnant or trying to become pregnant.
Subject has a medical condition not listed above that may affect validity of the study as determined by the investigator.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject has a medical condition not listed above that may put the subject at risk as determined by the investigator.
Subject was unwilling or unable to follow instructions in the RESTFUL Study, including missing 2 or more follow-up evaluations.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject failed to properly operate the investigational devices during Weeks 5-8 of the RESTFUL Study.
[applicable to Arm 1 only] Subject experienced a significantly higher than expected rate of device malfunctions in the RESTFUL Study, such that the malfunctions appeared to be directly related to the subject's pattern of use.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan D Charlesworth, PhD | Noctrix Health, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Center for Sleep Disorders | San Leandro | California | 94578 | United States | ||
| Delta Waves, Inc. |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37439365 | Derived | Roy A, Ojile J, Kram J, Olin J, Rosenberg R, Hudson JD, Bogan RK, Charlesworth JD. Long-term efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation for treatment of medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: A 24-Week Open-Label Extension Study. Sleep. 2023 Oct 11;46(10):zsad188. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad188. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects were recruited from the parent study (CT-04, RESTFUL Study). The CT-04 study enrolled 133 subjects, 126 of which completed the study. These 126 subjects were invited to participate in the CT-05 Extension study but 23 were not enrolled (7 not reachable, 12 did not consent, 1 was ineligible and 3 were unable to enroll due to a site not yet active.). This left 103 subjects that were consented and enrolled in CT-05, the Extension study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm 1 - Direct Roll-Over Extension | 24-wks of Active neurostimulation - Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver active stimulation; followed by 8-wks of No Intervention NTX100 Neuromodulation System: Active Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode |
| FG001 | Arm 2 - Control Group | 24-wks of No Intervention |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm 1 - Direct Roll-Over Extension | 24-wks of Active neurostimulation - Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver active stimulation; followed by 8-wks of No Intervention NTX100 Neuromodulation System: Active Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Subjects for Which the Clinician Reported "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale in Treatment Group (Arm 1) Relative to Baseline. | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the investigator-rated 7-point CGI-I scale. The outcomes were also evaluated as Treatment Group (Arm 1) at 24 weeks related to Control Group (Arm 2) at 24 weeks. The primary outcome, however, is the measure relative to baseline. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 24 |
|
Up to 32 weeks.
Descriptive analyses of adverse events for both study arms, classified and tabulated by seriousness, relationship to the device, and severity.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm 1 | Treatment Group | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discomfort | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Charlesworth, PhD | Noctrix Health, Inc. | 804-683-4279 | jcharlesworth@noctrixhealth.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 24, 2021 | Aug 20, 2024 | Prot_003.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 10, 2023 | Aug 20, 2024 | SAP_004.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012148 | Restless Legs Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020919 | Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic |
| D020920 | Dyssomnias |
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Week 24 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score in Arm 1 | IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe. Note that the IRLS score was calculated relative to baseline for the endpoint but was also be calculated relative to the value for the control group at Week 24. | Week 24 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) Score in Arm 1 | MOS-II is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. Note that the mean MOS-II score was calculated relative to baseline for the endpoint but was also be calculated relative to the value for the control group at Week 24. | Week 24 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index I (MOS-I) Score in Arm 1 | MOS-I is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. Note that the outcome is measured relative to baseline but also relative to the Arm 2 (control group) at 24 weeks. | Week 24 |
| Days Per Week of RLS Symptoms Based on Question #7 in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score in Arm 1 | The International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Question #7 is a participant-rated question that measures the frequency of RLS symptoms in terms of days per week. | Week 24 |
| Colorado Springs |
| Colorado |
| 95125 |
| United States |
| Neurotrials Research | Atlanta | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Clayton Sleep Institute | St Louis | Missouri | 63123 | United States |
| Ohio Sleep Medicine Institute | Dublin | Ohio | 43017 | United States |
| Bogan Sleep Consultants, LLC | Columbia | South Carolina | 29201 | United States |
| FutureSearch Trials of Neurology | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Arm 2 - Control Group |
24-wks of No Intervention |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Arm 2 - Control Group | 24-wks of No Intervention |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Subjects That Report "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale in the Treatment Group (Arm 1) Relative to Baseline. | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale in the Treatment Group (Arm 1) Relative to Baseline. Note that the Responder Rate was be calculated relative to baseline for the endpoint but was also be calculated relative to the value for the control group at Week 24. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score in Arm 1 | IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe. Note that the IRLS score was calculated relative to baseline for the endpoint but was also be calculated relative to the value for the control group at Week 24. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) Score in Arm 1 | MOS-II is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. Note that the mean MOS-II score was calculated relative to baseline for the endpoint but was also be calculated relative to the value for the control group at Week 24. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index I (MOS-I) Score in Arm 1 | MOS-I is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. Note that the outcome is measured relative to baseline but also relative to the Arm 2 (control group) at 24 weeks. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Days Per Week of RLS Symptoms Based on Question #7 in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score in Arm 1 | The International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Question #7 is a participant-rated question that measures the frequency of RLS symptoms in terms of days per week. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Days/Week | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| 44 |
| 0 |
| 44 |
| 10 |
| 44 |
| EG001 | Arm 2 | Control Group | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | 3 | 44 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D020447 |
| Parasomnias |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |