Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm observational study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of the iCover covered stent over a 24-month follow-up period for the treatment of de novo iliac occlusive lesions, defined by a significant vessel stenosis ≥70%, in patients with symptomatic arteriopathy of the lower limbs (Rutherford class 2 to 5).
This is a prospective, single-arm, multinational, and multicenter study conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the iCover covered stent for the treatment of de novo iliac occlusive lesions (common and/or external iliac arteries) in patients with symptomatic lower limb arteriopathy. The primary endpoint of the study is primary patency, defined as the absence of restenosis in the target lesion over a 12-month follow-up period in patients who did not undergo a reintervention on the target lesion. Restenosis is defined as a reduction in the luminal diameter of more than 50%, assessed either by duplex ultrasound (considered as a peak systolic velocity index ≥ 2.4 at the target lesion) or by angio-CT (multiplanar reconstruction). Secondary endpoints include: technical and procedural success rate, freedom from all major adverse events, incidence of procedure- or device-related major local complications at the treated lesion, rate of SAEs, major amputation rate at the target limb, primary sustained clinical improvement (improvement in Rutherford classification), primary and secondary patency rates, TLR and TVR rates, and changes in ABI, the Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and the EQ-5D questionnaire from baseline.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| iCover covered stent | Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covered stent implantation | Device | Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with iCover covered stent for the treatment of de novo aorto-iliac occlusive lesions |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Patency | The primary patency, defined as the absence of restenosis in the target lesion over the 12-month follow-up period in patients who did not undergo a reintervention on the target lesion. | 12 months after index procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Technical success rate | Technical success rate, defined as the ability to cross and dilate the lesion and achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% after iCover stent graft insertion. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions treated at the end of the procedure. | Day 0. |
| Procedural success rate |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Subjects will not be eligible to participate in the study if any of the following conditions are present in the subject:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with symptomatic arteriopathy of the lower limbs (Rutherford class 2 to 5). Patients with de novo atheromatous aorto-iliac lesions.
According to the incidence of TASC II lesions, approximately 70% of the patients will be classified as TASC II A or B lesions, while the other 30% will be classified as TASC II C or D lesions.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onze Lieve Vrouw Aalst | Aalst | Belgium | ||||
| Imelda Bonheiden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Procedural success rate, defined as technical success and no complications during the procedure including general and local complications as defined in the protocol. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of patients at the end of the procedure. |
| Day 0. |
| Freedom from All Major Adverse Event (MAEs) | MAEs are described as All-Cause Mortality post-procedure, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) post-procedure and Major Amputation of the Target Limb post-procedure (amputations above the ankle of the target leg). | 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Incidence of Procedure- or Device- related Major Local Complications | Incidence of Procedure- or Device- related Major Local Complications at the treated lesion or Puncture Site up to 30 days post-procedure. Major Local Complications include: Iliac arterial rupture, retroperitoneal hematoma, thrombosis of the iliac axis on the ipsilateral side, need for surgery to achieve hemostasis, bleeding with loss of more than 2 g/ dL of hemoglobin, false aneurysm at the puncture site, preventing resumption of walking at 24 hours or appearance of ischemia on the ipsilateral side. | Up to 30 days after index procedure. |
| Rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Rates of SAEs, including both related and unrelated events. SAEs will be categorized as related or unrelated to the procedure/device based on adjudication by an Independent Clinical Events Committee. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Major amputation at target limb rate | Percentage of patients with amputations above the ankle of the target leg will be counted. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Primary sustained clinical improvement | Primary sustained clinical improvement defined as a sustained upward shift of 1 category of the Rutherford classification for patients with claudication, and by wound healing and rest pain resolution for patients in critical limb ischemia, without the need for repeated target lesion revascularization in surviving patients. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Primary patency rates | Primary patency rates, defined as the lack of restenosis without reintervention of the target lesion. Restenosis is defined as a reduction in the luminal diameter of more than 50%, determined by either, duplex ultrasound examination considered as a peak systolic velocity index ≥ 2.4 at the target lesion, or by angio-CT (multiplanar reconstruction). In case of death, the vessel is considered as patent as long as no restenosis was detected during the last visit before the patient died. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions (Time frame: 6, 24 months after index procedure). | 6 and 24 months after index procedure. |
| Secondary patency rates | Secondary patency rates, defined as the patency of the stent following an endovascular or surgical reintervention due to significant in-stent restenosis or occlusion. Outcomes computed as percentage of lesions. | 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate | Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, defined as the need for repeated procedures (endovascular or surgical) due to a problem arising from the lesion initially treated in surviving patients with preserved limbs. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate | Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate, defined as the need for repeated procedures (endovascular or surgical) due to a problem arising remote from the vessel initially treated in surviving patients with preserved limbs. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure. |
| Change in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) from baseline | Change in ABI from baseline. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months post-procedure. |
| Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire from baseline | The Walking Impairment Questionnaire values will be recorded and compared to the baseline values. This questionnaire is a validated tool to assess walking capability in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease in different situations. | 1, 6, 12, 24 months post-procedure. |
| Change in quality of life from baseline | Change in quality of life from baseline, as measured by EQ-5D. The EQ-5D Questionnaire values will be recorded and compared to the baseline values. It is a validated questionnaire to measure the quality of life based on 5 different parameters. Worst possible score in this study would be 0, best possible score would be 1. In addition, the patient indicates her/his current health on an analog scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). | 1, 6, 12, 24 months post-procedure. |
| Bonheiden |
| Belgium |
| Az Sint Blasius Dendermonde | Dendermonde | Belgium |
| ZOL Genk | Genk | Belgium |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest | Brest | France |
| CHU Pitié Salpêtrière | Paris | France |
| Hôpital Paris Saint Joseph | Paris | France |
| Hôpital privé Saint-Martin | Pessac | France |
| Hôpital privé Villeneuve d'Ascq | Villeneuve-d'Ascq | France |
| Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen | Bad Krozingen | Baden-Wurttemberg | 79189 | Germany |
| MVZ Kaiserslautern | Kaiserslautern | Rhineland-Palatinate | 67657 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Leipzig | Leipzig | Saxony | 04103 | Germany |
| KEH Berlin | Berlin | Germany |
| Imland Klinik Rendsburg | Rendsburg | Germany |
| Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau | Barcelona | Spain |
| Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol | Barcelona | Spain |
| Hospital de Cruces | Bilbao | Spain |
| Hospital Parc Taulí | Sabadell | Spain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided