Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Heart failure (HF) is a common disease, which impacts on other organs. Despite an ongoing progress in knowledge about HF, there are still some uncharted aspects of impact of HF on respiratory system. The aim of the study is to determine whether there are any differences in pulmonary changes assessed in chest CT, chest ultrasound or in pulmonary function tests between patients with HF with decreased (≤40%; HFrEF) and preserved (≥50%; HFpEF) ejection fraction.
Eighty four patients diagnosed with HF will be included (42 with HFrEF and 42 with HFpEF) and the following tests will be performed :
In patients with abnormal, suspected changes in the lungs diagnosed in the chest CT bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) will be offered.
The primary outcome will be difference in frequency of chest CT abnormalities (ground-glass opacities or interlobular septal thickening or pleural effusion or mediastinal lymphadenopathy) between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF
The secondary outcomes will be:
The results of the study will allow to .better understand the pathomechanisms of the occurrence of lesions in lungs secondary to HF. Thus, it may anable to reduce unnecessary diagnostics in patients with HF in the future.
Heart failure (HF) is a global disease, which affects 1-2% adults worldwide. It is believed that 60% of these patients have HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF≤40%; HFrEF), 24% have HF with mildly reduced (EF 41-49%; HFmrEF) and 16% have HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥50%, HFpEF). Despite its high prevalence, there are still many aspects of the disease that are not well recognized yet. One of them is impact of HFpEF on function lungs. Previous studies focused on this topic are scarce and mainly concern patients with advanced HFrEF. It was documented that HFrEF may lead to both lung abnormal changes in chest imaging and lung function tests. It may sometimes lead to unnecessary diagnostic procedures. However, pathophysiology and clinical relevance between heart and lung function in HFpEF patients still need to be elucidated.
Thus the aim of the study is to determine whether pulmonary abnormal findings found both in chest imaging and pulmonary function tests are comparable in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF.
Patients:
The study will include 84 patients (42 with HFrEF and 42 with HFpEF) aged 50-90 years diagnosed with chronic HF (NYHA II/III) in a stable period.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Power analysis and sample size calculations indicated that a sample size of 84 subjects would provide 80% statistical power to detect significant differences between the two groups (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.20) assuming that abnormal findings in chest CT will be present in 60% of patients with HFrEF and in 30% of subjects with HFpEF.
Included patients will be examined by:
The primary outcome :
1. difference in frequency of chest CT abnormalities (ground-glass opacities or interlobular septal thickening or pleural effusion or mediastinal lymphadenopathy) between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF
The secondary outcomes:
The results of the study will allow to better understand the pathomechanisms of the occurrence of lesions in lungs secondary to HF. Thus, it may enable to reduce unnecessary diagnostics in patients with HF in the future.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction | 42 patients 50-90 years with preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥50%) | ||
| Heart failure and reduced ejection fraction | 42 patients 50-90 years with reduced ejection fraction ((EF≤40%) |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| difference in frequency of chest CT abnormalities between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF | difference in frequency of chest CT abnormalities (ground-glass opacities or interlobular septal thickening or pleural effusion or mediastinal lymphadenopathy) between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF | baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in lung function measured in spirometry between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | Differences in median forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) and forced volume capacity (FVC) in spirometry between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | baseline |
| Differences in lung function measured by bodypletysmography between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with chronic heart failure between 50-90 years old.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marta DÄ…browska | Medical University of Warsaw | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw | Warsaw | 02-097 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24976926 | Background | Cardinale L, Priola AM, Moretti F, Volpicelli G. Effectiveness of chest radiography, lung ultrasound and thoracic computed tomography in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. World J Radiol. 2014 Jun 28;6(6):230-7. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i6.230. | |
| 21041971 | Background | Kee K, Naughton MT. Heart failure and the lung. Circ J. 2010 Nov;74(12):2507-16. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0869. Epub 2010 Oct 28. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Differences in median total lung capacity (TLC) and reserved volume(RV) in body plethysmography between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF |
| baseline |
| Difference in DLCO between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | Differences in median diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | baseline |
| Differences in arterial pO2 and pCO2 between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | Differences in median arterial pO2 and pCO2 between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | baseline |
| Differences in lung hydration between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | difference in median B- line score in lung ultrasound between patients with HFpEF and HFrEF | baseline |
| 16574532 | Background | Ardekani MS, Issa M, Green L. Diagnostic and economic impact of heart failure induced mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 28;109(1):137-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.04.011. No abstract available. |
| 29788047 | Background | Obokata M, Olson TP, Reddy YNV, Melenovsky V, Kane GC, Borlaug BA. Haemodynamics, dyspnoea, and pulmonary reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2018 Aug 7;39(30):2810-2821. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy268. |
| 32634145 | Background | Huang WM, Feng JY, Cheng HM, Chen SZ, Huang CJ, Guo CY, Yu WC, Chen CH, Sung SH. The role of pulmonary function in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: Looking beyond chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0235152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235152. eCollection 2020. |
| 34447992 | Background | McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, Burri H, Butler J, Celutkiene J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. No abstract available. |