Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: CONSYST-CRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: CONSYST-CRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Conduction system pacing vs biventricular resynchronization therapy in systolic dysfunction and wide QRS (CONSYST-CRT randomized clinical trial) is a non-inferiority trial that aims to study the composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, heart failure hospitalizations, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement <5 points.
To date, studies have shown that conduction system pacing could get similar clinical and echocardiographic responses to those obtained with biventricular therapy.
This study will randomize 130 patients to a strategy of biventricular pacing versus conduction system pacing.
CONSYST-CRT study will analyze the following parameters in the 2 groups: left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular volumes, echocardiographic response (>=15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume), NYHA functional class, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, QRS shortening, echocardiographic asynchrony (septal flash).
Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic follow-up will be performed for 1 year.
The first 70 patients have been recruited in the context of the LEVELAT study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04054895)
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: