Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the ExoNET passive robotic device. It will provide upper-extremity gravity compensation for therapeutic movement retraining in the chronic post stroke patient population.
The ExoNET, a passive robotic solution that provides a soft, biomimetic, and elastic alternative to robotics that embodies intelligence within the mechanical design. Several groups have been exploring performance enhancement using springs with custom-tuned parameters via optimization. Here, it is possible to have a simple reconfigurable system that can not only assist performance, but can also make training easier, faster, and more complete. This contribution has the potential to be clinically significant for rehabilitating neurologically impaired individuals because this proposal will investigate how motor learning can be facilitated through novel assistive technology.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy using the ExoNET. Specifically, investigators want to see if the ExoNET tuned to gravity support will lead to a reduction in bicep muscle activity and an increase in range of motion. To accomplish this aim, we plan to have participants perform reaching, arm elevation and flexion task exercises wearing the ExoNET. To achieve these goals, we will use a wearable activity tracker (MiGo), to detect the number of activities performed, a wearable surface EMG system (Delsys) on the bicep muscles and a markerless system called the Kinect (version 2) to collect distribution of motion.
Investigators hypothesize that individuals with post-stroke arm movement deficits treated with ExoNET gravity compensation will improve their ARAT measures more than controls receiving a sham treatment. Secondarily, treated subjects will improve in other clinical metrics and will make more movements than controls.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Gravity Compensation | Experimental | The participants will be wearing the ExoNet device tuned to gravity support. |
|
| Control Group: No Gravity Compensation | Sham Comparator | The participants will be wearing the ExoNet device, but it will not be tuned to gravity support. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ExoNet Tuned to Gravity Support | Device | This study's primary goal is to test the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the ExoNET device developed in the Robotics Lab at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. We want to observe if individuals using the ExoNET tuned to gravity support will notice a reduction in bicep muscle activity, leading to an improvement in functional outcome measures in stroke patients. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Action Research Arm Test | observational measure used to assess change in upper extremity performance in individuals with a damaged nervous system | Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 4 (post evaluations), and week 9 (follow-up evaluations) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer | observational measure used to measure change in upper extremity impairment in individuals with a damaged nervous system | Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 4 (post evaluations), and week 9 (follow-up evaluations) |
| Wolf Motor Function Test |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Electromyography using Delsys | Delsys sensors will be used to measure change in biceps activity | Treatment phases (week 2 and week 3) |
| Kinect | markerless system to collect changes of distribution of motion |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shirley Ryan AbilityLab | Chicago | Illinois | 60610 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40537460 | Derived | Celian C, Ryali P, Wilson V, Srivatsa A, Patton JL. A Wearable Anti-Gravity Supplement to Therapy Does Not Improve Arm Function in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Sep;39(9):728-741. doi: 10.1177/15459683251338792. Epub 2025 Jun 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Quantitative measure of change of upper extremity motor ability |
| Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 4 (post evaluations), and week 9 (follow-up evaluations) |
| Box and Blocks | Measures change in unilateral gross motor dexterity | Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 4 (post evaluations), and week 9 (follow-up evaluations) |
| Treatment phases (week 2 and week 3) |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |