Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01AG061888 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The full experiment involves participants coming into the lab on five separate occasions for neuropsychological testing, a decision making battery, functional and structural MRI, and two TMS sessions for stimulation of the target or control stimulation site. The clinical trial component concerns only the last two sessions where subjects will be randomly assigned to different groups to receive different TMS interventions.
In particular, the TMS experiments will ask two main questions:
The investigators will use continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS, Huang et al. 2005) to inhibit neural activity in each region for approximately 50 minutes (Wischnewski & Schutter, 2015) and measure the downstream effects on behavior in younger and older adults. Consistent with their respective roles in the explore-exploit circuit (Figure 5 in Research Strategy), the investigators predict that inhibition of frontal pole will lead to a selective reduction in directed, but not random, exploration, while inhibition of IFG will decrease exploitation and lead to increases in both types of exploration.
Participants in each age group will be pseudo-randomly assigned to either the frontal pole group or IFG group such that the study will have 42 participants (21 males, 21 females) in each group. Thus there will be four distinct groups of subjects older frontal pole, younger frontal pole, older IFG, younger IFG. Each participant will take part in two TMS sessions, one target and one control session. The order of sessions will be counterbalanced across subjects.
The primary endpoints of the study are to determine whether:
The study is powered to answer these questions with 80% power at a threshold of p < 0.05.
Participants will take part in five experimental sessions. These will involve neuropsychological testing, a decision making battery, functional and structural MRI, and two sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to either a target or control region. The clinical trial component concerns only the last two sessions where subjects will be randomly assigned to different groups to receive different TMS interventions. For completeness, all sessions are described below:
240 participants (110 younger, 130 older, 50% female) will be recruited from the local Tucson population. Neuropsychological testing in the first session will be used to exclude participants who exhibit symptoms of mild cognitive impairment or early stage Alzheimer's.
Decision making battery: All participants will perform the Horizon Task (Wilson et al. 2014) to measure explore-exploit behavior in addition to a Decision Making battery to measure risk taking, ambiguity attitude, temporal discounting, and behavioral variability.
Neuroimaging: 92 younger and 92 older adults will return to take part in the MRI experiment. All participants will be screened during the telephone interview and the behavioral session to rule out contraindications for MRI and TMS and screened once more at the start of the MRI session. MRI experiments will take place in the 3T Skyra scanner at the neuroimaging facility at Banner University Medical Center. All neuroimaging experiments will be run according to standard safety guidelines (Rossi et al. 2009) and participants will be screened and give informed consent before the procedure beings.
Each scan session will last about 90 minutes and will include a short localizer scan (approximately 1 minute), a T1-weighted structural scan (6 minutes), diffusion tensor imaging to assess structural connectivity (DTI, 10 minutes), FLAIR to quantify white matter hyperintensities (2 minutes), a field map to correct for magnetic field inhomogeneities, especially in frontal pole (2 minutes), resting-state fMRI to measure functional connectivity (8 minutes), and event-based fMRI using the task described below (50-60 minutes). All functional scans will be acquired with parameters that are optimized prevent signal dropout in frontal pole and other frontal regions (Deichmann et al. 2003).
Sessions 4 and 5 (TMS): The TMS sessions fit the definition of a clinical trial because subjects will be prospectively assigned to different groups who will receive different interventions in different orders. Participants in each age group will be pseudo-randomly assigned to groups according to whether the target region for TMS is frontal pole of IFG. Thus, there will be four distinct groups of subjects: older frontal pole, younger frontal pole, older IFG, younger IFG, with 42 participants (21 males, 21 females) in each group. Each participant will take part in two TMS sessions, one target and one control session. The order of sessions will be counterbalanced across subjects.
TMS sessions will take place in new TMS facility at Banner University Medical Center. All TMS will be delivered in line with established safety guidelines (Rossi et al, 2009) under the supervision of co-I Chou who is the director of the TMS facility and has extensive experience with TMS in young, old and cognitively impaired subjects. When followed correctly, these guidelines ensure that TMS is a very safe procedure with only a handful of adverse events occurring in approximately 20 years of research.
After completing consent and screening procedures, each TMS session will begin with the measurement of the action motor threshold (AMT). The AMT is defined as the minimum stimulus intensity that produces a liminal motor-evoked potential (about 200 μV in 50% of 10 trials) during isometric contraction of the tested muscle. After the AMT has been measured, participants will receive cTBS (50Hz stimulation at 80% AMT for 40 seconds; Huang et al 2005). Stimulation will be applied to either the target area (frontal pole or IFG) or control area (vertex) with the order of sessions counterbalanced across participants. Proper targeting of each region will be achieved using a frameless neuronavigation system (Localite TMS Navigator) with a Polaris Spectra infrared camera (Northern Digital, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada). This system enables stimulation to be centered on specific coordinates in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. Coordinates [x,y,z] = [35,50,15] will be used for frontal pole (based previous fMRI work and our original TMS study, Daw et al., 2006; Zajkowski et al. 2017) and [x,y,z] = [56,16,22] for right IFG based on the location of our activations in the young pilot group. The vertex control site is defined as the Cz position of a 10-20 EEG system. After receiving TMS, participants will stare at a white wall for 1 minute before performing the Horizon Task for 45 minutes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target: frontal pole; Order: frontal pole first | Experimental | In this arm the target stimulation site is the frontal pole, the control stimulation site is the vertex. Participants will receive the frontal pole stimulation in the first TMS session and vertex stimulation in the second TMS session. |
|
| Target: frontal pole; Order: vertex first | Experimental | In this arm the target stimulation site is the frontal pole, the control stimulation site is the vertex. Participants will receive the vertex stimulation in the first TMS session and frontal pole stimulation in the second TMS session. |
|
| Target: IFG; Order: IFG first | Experimental | In this arm the target stimulation site is the IFG, the control stimulation site is the vertex. Participants will receive IFG stimulation in the first TMS session and vertex stimulation in the second TMS session. |
|
| Target: IFG; Order: vertex first | Experimental | In this arm the target stimulation site is the IFG, the control stimulation site is the vertex. Participants will receive vertex stimulation in the first TMS session and IFG stimulation in the second TMS session. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation | Device | Participants will receive cTBS (50Hz stimulation at 80% AMT for 40 seconds). Stimulation will be applied to either the target area (frontal pole or IFG) or control area (vertex). Targeting of each region will be achieved using a frameless neuronavigation system with a Polaris Spectra infrared camera that enables stimulation to be centered on specific coordinates in Montreal Neurological Institute space. We will use coordinates [x,y,z] = [35,50,15] for frontal pole and [x,y,z] = [56,16,22] for right IFG based on the location of our activations in the young pilot group (Figure 4). The vertex control site is defined as the Cz position of a 10-20 EEG system. After receiving TMS, participants will stare at a white wall for 1 minute before performing the Horizon Task for 45 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Directed exploration | Change in directed exploration as a result of stimulation to target vs control site. Directed exploration will be measured using the Horizon Task (Wilson et al. 2014) in which directed exploration is defined as the change in p(high info) between horizon 1 and horizon 6. | Between TMS session 1 and TMS session 2 (1-2 weeks) |
| Random exploration | Change in random exploration as a result of stimulation to target vs control site. Random exploration will be measured using the Horizon Task (Wilson et al. 2014) in which random exploration is defined as the change in p(low mean) between horizon 1 and horizon 6. | Between TMS session 1 and TMS session 2 (1-2 weeks) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Arizona | Tucson | Arizona | 85721 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25347535 | Background | Wilson RC, Geana A, White JM, Ludvig EA, Cohen JD. Humans use directed and random exploration to solve the explore-exploit dilemma. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2074-81. doi: 10.1037/a0038199. Epub 2014 Oct 27. | |
| 16778890 | Background | Daw ND, O'Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):876-9. doi: 10.1038/nature04766. |
Not provided
Not provided
All behavioral and neuroimaging data will be shared after publication of the findings journal articles. Behavioral data from all experiments, including behavior from in the scanner will be shared on the dataverse.org. Neuroimaging data will be shared on openneuro.org an NIH sponsored repository for neuroimaging data including complex fMRI data sets. All code pertaining to data analyses used for any publications will be shared on GitHub.
All data will be deidentified before sharing.
Data will be deposited into the repositories as soon as possible but no later than within one year of the completion of the funded project period for the parent award or upon acceptance of the data for publication, or public disclosure of a submitted patent application, whichever is earlier.
Any user with an account at dataverse.org, openneuro.org or GitHub will be able to access data and/or code.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_ICF | Yes | No | Yes | Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form | Sep 13, 2023 | May 14, 2025 | Prot_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026 | Apr 14, 2026 | 4 |
The main analyses in this study will ask whether cTBS applied to frontal pole and IFG changes explore-exploit behavior relative to the control condition where cTBS is applied to vertex within age group. Our main predictions are: (1) frontal pole will reduce directed exploration in both age groups, and (2) IFG stimulation will increase both directed and random exploration in both age groups.
To test these hypotheses we will perform separate repeated-measures ANOVAs for the different age groups (younger and older adults), for different types of exploration (directed vs random), and for the different target stimulation sites (frontal pole vs IFG), yielding 8 different analyses.
Each ANOVA will include TMS condition (vertex vs target) as a within subject factor and order (vertex first vs target first) as a between-subjects factor. The key question is whether there is a main effect of TMS condition on our measures of directed and random exploration.
Not provided
Not provided
Because stimulation occurs at different locations on the scalp participants will be able to distinguish between the two conditions. However, because they will be unaware of our hypothesis, they will not know which condition is the control condition and which is the target condition.
|
|
| 28914605 | Background | Zajkowski WK, Kossut M, Wilson RC. A causal role for right frontopolar cortex in directed, but not random, exploration. Elife. 2017 Sep 15;6:e27430. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27430. |
| 19833552 | Background | Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. |
| 15664172 | Background | Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033. |
| 26014214 | Background | Wischnewski M, Schutter DJ. Efficacy and Time Course of Theta Burst Stimulation in Healthy Humans. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 26. |