Comparison of the Substitution Between Different Tobacco/Nicotine Products as a Function of Tobacco-user Type
Comparison of the Substitution Between Different Tobacco/Nicotine Products as a Function of Tobacco-user Type
This study will investigate the relative appeal (abuse liability) of novel tobacco products, how the appeal is modulated by relative price, user type, and how novel products may substitute for one another.
An important aim of tobacco control is to reduce demand for the most harmful products. Therefore, a priori knowledge of substitutability across novel and widely used tobacco products may forecast the impact of policies on product switching. This study will use a novel method, the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM), to characterize the relative substitutability and appeal (abuse liability) of tobacco products (e.g., conventional cigarettes, nicotine vaping products [NVP], heated tobacco products [HTP], and nicotine pouch products [NPP]), and how the appeal is modulated by relative price and user type. Exclusive cigarette smokers and dual cigarette/NVP users, stratified by age, will complete multiple scenarios in the ETM.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: