Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
COVID pandemic
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Various modalities have been proposed for real-time confirmation of loss of resistance (LOR) for thoracic epidural blocks. With real-time ultrasound (US) guidance, the anesthesiologist attempts to visualize the sonographic advancement of the epidural needle and penetration of the epidural space (as detected by LOR)
This observational study is set out to confirm the reliability of real-time ultrasound guidance as an adjunct to LOR for thoracic epidural blocks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or having rib fractures | Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or having rib fractures who will have placed a thoracic epidural catheter to manage their perioperative analgesia. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time ultrasound guidance for thoracic epidural catheter placement. | Procedure | With an US-guided parasagittal oblique approach, the interlaminar space at the union between laminas and spinous processes at the predefined insertion level will be identified. A skin wheal will be raised with 3 mL of lidocaine 1%. Afterward, an 18-gauge Tuohy epidural block needle will be advanced under direct US vision until the tip is insinuated between the laminas and anchored to the flavum ligament. Then the needle will be attached to a low resistance syringe prefilled with saline solution and advanced until LOR to injection is confirmed. Then a 20-Gauge epidural catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm beyond the needle tip inside the epidural space and the needle removed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of successful epidural blocks after US-guided insertion of epidural catheters | After fifteen minutes of local anesthetic administration (4- mL dose of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 μg/mL ), an investigator will apply ice to the T1 to L4 dermatomes bilaterally. The criterion standard for success will be the presence of an epidural block, defined as a block to ice in at least 2 dermatomes bilaterally. If operators could not advance the catheter past the needle tip after 2 attempts despite a 180-degree rotation of the bevel between the first and second attempts, epidural blocks will be considered failures. | 15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection through the epidural catheter |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of blocked dermatomes | Number of blocked dermatomes after injection of local anesthetics through the epidural catheter. | 15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection through the epidural catheter |
| Localization of blocked dermatomes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or suffering from rib fractures who will have placed a thoracic epidural catheter to manage their perioperative analgesia.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Julián Aliste, MD | University of Chile | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital ClÃnico Universidad de Chile | Santiago | Metropolitan | 8380456 | Chile |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27035462 | Background | Tran DQ, Van Zundert TC, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Finlayson RJ. Primary Failure of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Training Centers: The Invisible Elephant? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):309-13. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000394. | |
| 25642911 | Background | Tran DQ, Gonzalez AP, Bernucci F, Finlayson RJ. Confirmation of loss-of-resistance for epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):166-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000217. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| D000008 | Abdominal Neoplasms |
| D012253 | Rib Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Localization of blocked dermatomes after injection of local anesthetics through the epidural catheter.
| 15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection through the epidural catheter |
| Image time | Needed time (minutes and seconds) to obtain an adequate image of the interlaminar space | Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection |
| Needle time | Needed time (minutes and seconds) to insert the Tuohy needle tip in the interlaminar space and confirm a loss of resistance | Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection |
| Catheter installation time | Elapsed time (minutes and seconds) from loss of resistance acquisition until the catheter is secured | Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection |
| Block performance time | Time (minutes and seconds) between skin disinfection and once the catheter is secured in place. | Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection |
| Epidural block-related complications | Incidence of adverse events related to epidural block or local anesthetic injection (i.e. paresthesia, accidental dural puncture, intravascular or subarachnoid position of catheters, intravascular, subarachnoid or subdural injection, local anesthetic systemic toxicity) | Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection |
| 26469364 | Background | Leurcharusmee P, Arnuntasupakul V, Chora De La Garza D, Vijitpavan A, Ah-Kye S, Saelao A, Tiyaprasertkul W, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):694-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000313. |
| 26894628 | Background | Arnuntasupakul V, Van Zundert TC, Vijitpavan A, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Leurcharusmee P, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):368-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000369. |
| 27827521 | Background | Elgueta MF, Duong S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Ultrasonography for neuraxial blocks: a review of the evidence. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 May;83(5):512-523. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11650-5. Epub 2016 Nov 9. |
| 29553999 | Background | Pak DJ, Gulati A. Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Thoracic Epidural Placement: A Feasibility Study of a Novel Technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):613-615. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000761. |
| 26508378 | Background | Yeager MP, Bae EE, Parra MC, Barr PA, Bonham AK, Sites BD. Fluoroscopy-assisted epidural catheter placement: an exploratory analysis of 303 pre-operative epidurograms. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Apr;60(4):513-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12649. Epub 2015 Oct 28. |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D013898 | Thoracic Injuries |