Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01NS124224-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) | NIH |
| Weill Medical College of Cornell University | OTHER |
| Bronx Veterans Medical Research Foundation, Inc | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Spinal cord associative plasticity (SCAP) is a combined cortical and spinal electrical stimulation technique developed to induce recovery of arm and hand function in spinal cord injury.
The proposed study will advance understanding of SCAP, which is critical to its effective translation to human therapy. The purpose of the study is to:
Aim 1 is designed to advance mechanistic understanding of spinal cord associative plasticity (SCAP).
Aim 2 will determine whether SCAP increases spinal cord excitability after the period of repetitive pairing. In rats, SCAP augments muscle activation for hours after just 5 minutes of paired stimuli.
Whereas Aims 1 and 2 focused on the effects of paired stimulation in the context of uninjured spinal cord, Aim 3 assesses whether paired stimulation can be effective across injured cord segments. Aim 3 will incorporate the experiments from Aim 1 and 2 but in people with SCI, either traumatic or pre-operative patients with myelopathy in non-invasive experiments, or targeting myelopathic segments in intraoperative segments.
For people with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), regaining hand function is their highest priority. Currently there are no effective treatments for people living with paralysis or profound weakness after SCI. The goal of this project is to translate a promising therapy for improving arm and hand function after partial spinal cord injury to humans. The approach promotes repair of residual brain to spinal cord connections using combined motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation.
The direct brain to spinal cord connection is critical for skilled hand movement in health, and for the loss of movement after injury. After spinal cord injury, many nerve connections for movement are preserved. These connections can be strengthened by electrical stimulation.
The investigator has previously demonstrated that pairing brain and spinal cord stimulation strengthens spinal connections in rats. But it is unknown whether this is also applicable in humans. This study is designed to test this in people undergoing spine surgery for pain or decreased movement as well as non-invasively in people with traumatic spinal cord injury. There are three main goals of this project. First, the investigator will stimulate brain and spinal cord (intra-operatively and non-invasively) to try to study the influence of the timing of pairing brain and spinal cord stimulation. Second, the investigator will study how repeating the optimal timing (spinal cord associative plasticity; SCAP) will influence muscle responses over a longer period of time when relatively uninjured parts of the spinal cord are targeted. Finally, the investigator will study how the influence of this protocol changes when injured parts of the cord are targeted. Stimulation of brain and spinal cord intra-operatively will be performed with the same devices that maintain safety during the surgery, while non-invasive stimulation will be performed with non-significant risk devices.
Participants: Uninjured volunteers, individuals with chronic (> 1 year) cervical SCI, and individuals with cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy requiring clinically indicated decompressive surgery will be recruited. SCI and myelopathy participants will have partially retained motor function in the hand, scoring 1-4 (out of 5) on manual muscle testing of finger extension, finger flexion, or finger abduction in left or right hand. Participants will also require detectable F-wave responses of the left or right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) to median nerve stimulation and/or first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) to ulnar nerve stimulation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Uninjured participants - Immediate and lasting effects of non-invasive paired stimulation | Experimental | Participants will take part in the following to examine the immediate effects of combining cortical and spinal stimulation: A) Non-invasive pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation; B) Non-invasive repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP). |
|
| 2. Intraoperative participants - Immediate effects of paired stimulation | Experimental | Participants will take part in the following if they have been scheduled for a clinically indicated cervical surgery to examine the immediate effects of combining cortical and spinal stimulation: A) Non-invasive pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation; B) Intraoperative pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation. |
|
| 3. Intraoperative participants - Lasting effects of SCAP | Experimental | Participants will take part in the following if they have been scheduled for a clinically indicated cervical surgery, to examine the lasting effects of repeated cortical and spinal stimulation: A) Non-invasive repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP); B) Intraoperative repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation | Procedure | Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) threshold, Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) threshold, and peripheral and central motor conduction times will be determined. In the active intervention, two TMS pulse intensities will be tested: 90% and 120% of motor threshold. Two conditioning TSCS pulse intensities will be tested: 50% and 90% of response threshold. Single TSCS pulses will be delivered timed to arrive in the cervical spinal cord at a range of intervals from 30ms before to 30ms after the TMS pulse. The control conditions will include TMS only TSCS only and non-convergent pairing latency pairing stimulation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Size of hand muscle response to brain stimulation during combined brain and spinal stimulation | Size of hand muscle response will be measured in response to brain and spinal cord stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord. This value will be normalized to the muscle response for brain only stimulation. This applies to Arms 1-2. | Immediate |
| Size of hand muscle response to brain stimulation after SCAP | Size of hand muscle response will be measured in response to brain and spinal cord stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord. This value will be normalized to the equivalent measure taken before the SCAP protocol. This applies to Arms 3-5. | Immediately after SCAP |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Size of hand muscle response to spinal cord stimulation | Size of hand muscle response will be measured in response to brain and spinal cord stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord. This value will be normalized to the equivalent measure taken before the SCAP protocol. | Immediately after SCAP |
| Duration of effect of SCAP on subsequent responses to brain or spinal cord stimulation |
Not provided
NON-INVASIVE
Inclusion Criteria:
(All participants)
(Able-bodied participants)
(SCI participants - including patients scheduled for intraoperative procedures)
Exclusion criteria:
(All participants)
INTRA-OPERATIVE
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
(For experiments involving cortical stimulation)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason B Carmel, M.D., Ph.D. | Contact | 917-301-1882 | jbc28@cumc.columbia.edu | |
| Noam Y Harel, M.D., Ph.D. | Contact | 212-241-7317 | noam.harel@mssm.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jason B Carmel, M.D., Ph.D. | Columbia University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronx Veterans Medical Research Foundation, Inc | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
Deidentified, individual-level data will be deposited to appropriate public repositories, such as Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (https://scicrunch.org/odc-sci), Figshare, or others.
This will allow more powerful meta-analysis of disparate smaller studies, a need which is even more urgent in neurorehabilitation than in other fields that are more amenable to large drug studies.
Within 6 months of manuscript preparation.
Individually identifiable data will be shared pursuant to valid HIPAA Authorization, Informed Consent, and an appropriate written agreement limiting use of the data to the conditions described in the authorization and consent.
A Data Use Agreement (DUA) will indicate adherence to any applicable Informed Consent provisions, and prohibits the recipient from identifying or re-identifying any individual whose data are included in the dataset.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants with chronic SCI, participants with spondylotic radiculopathy or myelopathy scheduled to undergo elective cervical decompression surgery, and volunteers without neural injury will be prospectively enrolled in this interventional experimental study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 4. Chronic cervical SCI participants - Lasting effects of non-invasive SCAP |
| Experimental |
Participants with chronic cervical SCI will take part in the following, to examine the lasting effects of repeated cortical and spinal stimulation: A) Non-invasive repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP). |
|
| 5. Intraoperative participants - Lasting effects of SCAP at or below myelopathic region | Experimental | Participants will take part in the following if they have been scheduled for a clinically indicated cervical surgery, to examine the lasting effects of repeated cortical and spinal stimulation: A) Non-invasive repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP); B) Intraoperative repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP) at or below myelopathic region. |
|
|
| Intraoperative pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation | Procedure | The surgeon will position spinal cord electrodes on the epidural surface one level rostral (typically C4/C5) to the site of myelopathy. Spinal and cortical thresholds will be determined. Investigator will then test the immediate effects of paired stimulation by stimulating the cortex at 120% of threshold and the spinal cord at 90% of threshold at various latencies relative to the time of synchronous convergence. The control intervention will include cortical only (120%) spinal only (90%) and non-convergent latency pairing stimulation. |
|
| Non-invasive repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP) | Procedure | Thresholds will be determined as above. Immediately prior to repetitive pairing, a set of 12 TMS pulses will be delivered at 120% threshold to measure the baseline cortical MEP. Likewise, a set of 12 TSCS pulses will be delivered at 120% of threshold to establish the baseline spinal MEP. For each session, baseline maximal pinch dynamometry will be determined. Immediately after the SCAP protocol is completed, response to TMS, TSCS, and maximal pinch dynamometry will be measured again every 10 minutes over the subsequent hour. The control conditions will include TMS only TSCS only and non-convergent pairing latency pairing stimulation. |
|
| Intraoperative repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP) | Procedure | Intraoperative: Spinal and cortical thresholds will be determined. Immediately prior to repetitive pairing, a set of 12 baseline cortical pulses and 12 baseline spinal pulses will be delivered at 120% threshold. SCAP protocol will be applied, both of which have been successful at inducing lasting effects in the rat. After pairing, cortical stimulation at 120% of threshold and spinal cord stimulation at 120% threshold will be repeated every 10 minutes for the duration of surgery. In a subset of patients repeated pairing will be conducted with a latency that investigator does not expect will induce SCAP, or with electrodes placed over the ventral epidural surface. The control intervention will include repeated pairing at a non-convergent latency, as well as pairing of cortical stimulation with ventral epidural stimulation. |
|
| Intraoperative repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP) at or below myelopathic region | Procedure | As per the intervention 'Intraoperative repeated pairing of cortical and spinal stimulation (SCAP)' targeted at or below myelopathic region. |
|
Time taken for the size of hand muscle response to fall to 50% of its maximal post-SCAP level. |
| 1 hour after SCAP |
| Pinch force | Pinch opposition strength between the tips of the thumb and third finger (a task highly dependent on cortical transmission to C8-T1 spinal circuitry will be measured using a handheld dynamometer. Force and root mean square (RMS) of electromyographic activity will be recorded. Maximal pinch dynamometry will be compared to baseline measurement. | Immediately after SCAP |
| Amplitudes of H-reflex ratio | H-reflex amplitudes (Hmax/Mmax), a biomarker for spasticity triggered with 1.0 ms pulses over the median nerve at the elbow. | Immediately after SCAP |
| Threshold for triggering muscle response from brain stimulation | The threshold for transcutaneous cortical electrical stimulation will be measured by increasing the voltage from 50V in 50V steps, until a MEP is detected. | Immediately after SCAP |
| Threshold for triggering muscle response from spinal cord stimulation | The threshold for spinal cord stimulation will be measured by increasing the stimulation amplitude from 1mA in 1mA steps, until an evoked potential is observable in the target muscle, or our safety limit is reached. In cases where clear evoked responses cannot be generated within stimulation amplitude safety limits, 3 pulse stimuli will be used, or investigator will modify target muscle for the remainder of the experiment. Study will target APB, but more responsive muscles may be substituted. | Immediately after SCAP |
| Size of hand muscle response to spinal cord stimulation (lasting) | Size of hand muscle response will be measured in response to brain and spinal cord stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord. This value will be normalized to the equivalent measure taken before the SCAP protocol. | 30 minutes after SCAP |
| Pinch force (lasting) | Pinch opposition strength between the tips of the thumb and third finger (a task highly dependent on cortical transmission to C8-T1 spinal circuitry will be measured using a handheld dynamometer. Force and root mean square (RMS) of electromyographic activity will be recorded. Maximal pinch dynamometry will be compared to baseline measurement. | 30 minutes after SCAP |
| Amplitudes of H-reflex ratio (lasting) | H-reflex amplitudes (Hmax/Mmax), a biomarker for spasticity triggered with 1.0 ms pulses over the median nerve at the elbow. | 30 minutes after SCAP |
| Threshold for triggering muscle response from brain stimulation (lasting) | The threshold for spinal cord stimulation will be measured by increasing the stimulation amplitude from 1mA in 1mA steps, until an evoked potential is observable in the target muscle, or our safety limit is reached. In cases where clear evoked responses cannot be generated within stimulation amplitude safety limits, 3 pulse stimuli will be used, or investigator will modify target muscle for the remainder of the experiment. Study will target APB, but more responsive muscles may be substituted. | 30 minutes after SCAP |
| Columbia University Irving Medical Center | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
|
| Weill Cornell Medicine | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011782 | Quadriplegia |
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C102196 | SREBP cleavage-activating protein |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided