Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will mainly focus on procedural pain management using oral morphine versus rectal ketamine during paediatric burn and wound dressing at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.
Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups A and B. Guardians of patients who are scheduled for burn wound care will sign written consent pre- operatively about procedural pain management. Group A will receive rectal ketamine while those in Group B will receive only traditional standard of care protocols.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROUP A | Experimental | Group A will receive rectal ketamine(Ket) |
|
| GROUP B | Active Comparator | Group B will receive only traditional standard of care protocols. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GROUP A | Drug | Rectal Ketamine will be administered at 6 mg/kg and with a rectal nozzle it's infused through the rectum. The rectal ketamine will be administered after scoring pain just before the start of the procedure and then about 15 minutes later the procedure will start when the patient has achieved a nystagmus. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PAIN SCORES ON ORAL MORPHINE VERSUS KETAMINE ARM | The primary endpoint will be difference in pain scores on a Revised FLACC(Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in the two arms.The primary endpoint will be difference in pain scores on a Revised FLACC(Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in the two arms. Each category is scored on the 0-2 scale, which results in a total score of 0-10. 0: Relaxed and comfortable, 1-3 : Mild discomfort ,4-6 : Moderate pain, 7-10 : Severe discomfort or pain or both | 4 hours |
| DIFFERENCE IN THE INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EFFECTS IN ORAL MORPHINE VERSUS KETAMINE ARM | Secondary endpoint will be the difference in the incidence of adverse effects a cross arms obtained from patient, nurse, and chart for DAIDS Adverse Event Grading Table 2014. | 4 hours |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| ALICE G. ATAI, MbChB | Mbarara University of Science and Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital | Mbarara | 00256 | Uganda | |||
| Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000073818 | Pain, Procedural |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Rectal ketamine versus oral morphine in pain management in paediatric wound and burns
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| GROUP B | Drug | The tradition standard protocols involve the use of 0.3mg/kg of oral morphine about an hour before the start of the procedure before the start of the procedure to allow for the onset of action of oral morphine for every single procedure in this arm. |
|
|
| Mbarara |
| 256 |
| Uganda |