Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale: Spirometry is essential in the diagnosis of airway disease and can be useful in monitoring patients. Despite the essential role, spirometry remains largely underused in primary care. Due to Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the use of office spirometry is contraindicated in many countries. Furthermore, spirometric devices are costly and personnel requires special training. Referral for spirometry increases the cost for patients and lowers the feasibility. Part of the reason for underdiagnosis of airway disease are the specific situations (such as exercise-induced asthma) in which spirometry in office setting might not reveal abnormalities. In recent years, handheld spirometry linked to phones/apps has been developed for study purposes and remote monitoring.
Objective: To study the feasibility, quality and added value of at-home spirometry for the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in primary care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| at-home spirometry | This group performs spirometry at home with the Nuvoair spirometer |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NuvoAir platform | Device | Nuvoair platform, consisting of a bluetooth spirometer, smartphone application and clinical portal |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Successful spirometry | Occurrence (expressed as percentage of patients) of home spirometry being graded A, following technical standards of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) (Graham, B. L. et al.) | 1 day: Participant will perform one spirometry session including several manoeuvres |
| Clinically useful spirometry | Occurrence (expressed as percentage of patients) of home spirometry being graded A, B or C, following technical standards of the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society (Graham, B.L. et al.) | 1 day: Participant will perform one spirometry session including several manoeuvres |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of spirometry, following ATS/ERS grading of spirometry | Quality of spirometry performed as rated by the device application using the American Thoracic Society /European Respiratory Society (ERS) grading of spirometry on a scale from A (≥3 acceptable and repeatability within 0.150 litre) to F (zero acceptable or usable) (Graham, B. L. et al.) | 1 day: Participant will perform one spirometry session including several manoeuvres |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Agreement between Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1) obtained from home spirometry and from spirometry assessed at the general practice | Mean difference (with 95% confidence interval) between the individual highest FEV1 value obtained from home spirometry and the FEV1 value from spirometry assessed at the general practice | 1 week: participant is performing one home-spirometry session and within the same week one session at the general practice |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In principle, all patients with a spirometry indication diagnosis or monitoring of their airway disease of 16 years or older will be eligible for at-home spirometry.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Janwillem Kocks | General Practitioners Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPRI | Groningen | 9713GH | Netherlands | |||
| Karolinska Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31613151 | Background | Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, Hallstrand TS, Kaminsky DA, McCarthy K, McCormack MC, Oropez CE, Rosenfeld M, Stanojevic S, Swanney MP, Thompson BR. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 15;200(8):e70-e88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST. | |
| 28851459 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Quality of spirometry curves as scored by independent spirometry professionals | Quality as assessed by visual inspection of curves and values by two or three (in case of disagreement between the first two) independent spirometry professionals whether manoeuvres are acceptable or not | 1 day: Participant will perform one spirometry session including several manoeuvres |
| Healthcare professional's view on the added value of home spirometry | Individual scores on a 5-points Likert-scale of questions asked to healthcare professionals regarding the added value of home spirometry for monitoring and diagnosing of asthma and COPD (the Likert-scales range from strongly disagree to strongly agree) | Immediately after completion of spirometry measurements |
| Patient's view on the added value of home spirometry | Individual scores on a 5-points Likert-scale of questions asked to the patient on the benefit of home spirometry (the Likert-scales range from strongly disagree to strongly agree) | Immediately after completion of spirometry measurements |
| Degree of feasibility of home spirometry as rated by the healthcare professional | Individual scores on a 5-points Likert-scale of questions on the feasibility of home spirometry, scored by health professionals, including four questions of a validated tool as published by Weiner et al. | Immediately after completion of spirometry measurements |
| Agreement between Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) obtained from home spirometry and from spirometry assessed at the general practice | Mean difference (with 95% confidence interval) between the individual highest FVC value obtained from home spirometry and the FVC value from spirometry assessed at the general practice | 1 week: participant is performing one home-spirometry session and within the same week one session at the general practice |
| Occurrence of patients requiring video assistance by a spirometry professional | Percentage of patients requiring assistance through a video connection with performing spirometry | 1 day: Participant will perform one spirometry session including several manoeuvres |
| Level of required assistance by a spirometry professional | Mean total time in minutes spent per patient by a spirometry professional for performing home spirometry | 1 day: Participant will perform one spirometry session including several manoeuvres |
| Solna |
| Stockholm County |
| Sweden |
| Background |
| Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3. |