Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-center, randomized, single-blinded comparative 3-arm clinical study. This clinical study is designed to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus stent to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT), and to NasoPore (Stryker) in preventing post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months post FESS.
50 chronic rhinosinusitis patients, that met the inclusion criteria will undergo bilateral FESS and subsequent bilateral placement of the ArchSinus into the randomized ethmoid sinus cavity and NasoPore / Propel into the other ethmoid sinus cavity. Comparative treatment sides will be randomly assigned; 50 sinuses treated with ArchSinus stent, 25 sinus treated with Propel stent, 25 sinuses treated with Nasopore. Standard Propel implant and 4cm whole NasoPore will be used.
ArchSinus stent will be removed 2 weeks (13-15 days) post FESS. Propel will be removed as necessary 2 weeks (13-15 days) post FESS. NasoPore arm will be debrided as necessary 2 weeks (13-15 days) post-FESS. Prior to removal / debridement procedures, the patients will be blindfolded, to keep them blinded for the treatment type on each side of their nose.
All patients will be followed up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks and 12 months post FESS and examined endoscopically. The endoscopic videos will be analyzed by independent pannel of 3 ENT surgeons, blinded to the treatment type, to assess middle turbinate lateralization on a 4-point scale.
CT scan will be performed pre-FESS and 12 weeks after the operation, to assess middle turbinate lateralization, as demonstrated by percent change in middle meatus (MM) area pre-FESS and 12 weeks after the surgery. Inflammatory mucosal thickening will be quantified using the Zinreich staging system. CT scans will be analyzed blindly by Medical Metrics Inc.
Symptomatic improvement will be analyzed weekly within 3 months follow up, using Side-specific Nasal SNOT-22 questioner.
Patient symptomatic relief during the implantation time will be analyzed 2 weeks post FESS, with Side-specific Nasal SNOT-22 questioner.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArchSinus stent | Experimental | Post-FESS implantation of the study device (ArchSinus) into ethmoid sinus cavity |
|
| Propel stent | Active Comparator | Post-FESS implantation of the comparator device (Propel) into ethmoid sinus cavity. |
|
| NasoPore packing | Active Comparator | Post-FESS implantation of the comparator device (NasoPore) into ethmoid sinus cavity. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArchSinus stent | Device | Post FESS unilateral placement of the ArchSinus stent into the randomized ethmoid sinus cavity. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Middle turbinate lateralization 12 week post FESS (based CT scan) | The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to Propel stent (Intersect ENT), to prevent post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization, 12 weeks post-FESS, based on CT scan. | 12 weeks post FESS |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Middle turbinate lateralization 12 week post FESS (based video endoscopy) | The secondary objective (1) is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT), ), to prevent post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization, 12 weeks post-FESS, based on video endoscopy on a 4-point scale. | 12 weeks post FESS |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Re-stenosis rate 6 weeks post FESS (based video endoscopy) | (1) Compare re-stenosis rate in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses assessed on a 1 to 4 scale based on nasal endoscopy at week 6 | 6 weeks post FESS |
| symptomatic relief 2 weeks post FESS |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lena Shlossberg, MS | Contact | +972526826962 | lena@ststent.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
50 chronic rhinosinusitis patients, that met the inclusion criteria will undergo randomization into ArchSinus / Propel or ArchSinus / NasoPore implantation group. Comparative treatment sides will be randomly assigned; 13 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (right)/ Propel (left); 12 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (left)/ Propel (right); 12 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (right)/ NasoPore (left); 13 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (left)/ NasoPore (right) groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Primary objective will be analyzed using nasal video endoscopy and a CT scan, by an external experts in a blinded fashion. Secondary objective will be analyzed using side-specific SNOT-22 questioner, subjects will be blinded to the treatment type.
|
| Symptomatic outcomes within the 3-month post-FESS |
The secondary objective (2) is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT) in improving the symptomatic outcomes based on side-specific SNOT-22 questioner, within the 3-month follow-up. |
| 12 weeks post FESS |
Compare symptomatic relief in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses, based side - specific Nasal SNOT-22 score 2 weeks post-FESS.
| 2 weeks post FESS |
| Removal time | Compare ArchSinus and Propel removal time | 2 weeks post FESS |
| Inflammatory mucosal thickening | Compare % change of inflammatory mucosal thickening 12 weeks post FESS in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses | 12 weeks post FESS |
| Re-stenosis rate 12 months post FESS | Compare re-stenosis rate in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses assessed on a 1 to 4 scale based on nasal endoscopy 12 months post FESS. | 12 months post FESS |