| Primary | Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Treatment-naïve Participants | BCVA was measured via Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity (VA) examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements (MMRM) model. | Treatment naïve ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or periocular/IVT corticosteroids treatment-naïve as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG00012.8± 1.30
- OG0019.4± 1.25
|
|
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| | MMRM | | 0.0625 | | Difference in Adjusted Means | 3.4 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.2 | 7.0 | | | | | Superiority | | |
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Systemic and Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Systemic AEs include all non-ocular AEs. | Safety Population included all participants randomized to study treatment and received at least one dose of the study treatment, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Up to Week 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Previously Treated Participants | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Previously treated ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids previously treated participants as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Overall ITT Population | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36, in Treatment-naïve Participants | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Treatment-naïve ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids treatment-naïve as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36, in Previously Treated Participants | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Previously treated ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids previously treated participants as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36, in Overall ITT Population | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Treatment-naïve Participants | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Treatment naïve ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids treatment-naïve as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Previously Treated Participants | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Previously treated ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids previously treated participants as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24, in Overall ITT Population | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in BCVA Over Time in Overall ITT Population | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores and gain in BCVA from baseline indicate improvement in VA. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | letters | | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥ 15, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, or ≥ 0 Letters in BCVA Over Time in Overall ITT Population | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Up to Week 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Losing ≥ 15, ≥ 10, or ≥ 5 Letters in BCVA Over Time in Overall ITT Population | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Up to Week 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With BCVA ≥ 69 Letters (20/40 Snellen Equivalent) Over Time | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 (Snellen equivalent <20/800) to 100 (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With BCVA ≥ 84 Letters (20/20 Snellen Equivalent) Over Time | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 (Snellen equivalent <20/800) to 100 (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With BCVA ≤ 38 Letters (20/200 Snellen Equivalent) Over Time | BCVA was measured via ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision vision^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified VA examiner. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 (Snellen equivalent <20/800) to 100 (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) letters. Higher scores indicate improvement in VA. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Treatment-naïve Participants | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 millimetre (mm) central subfield. CST was measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Treatment naïve ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids treatment-naïve as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Previously Treated Participants | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used a MMRM model. | Previously treated ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids previously treated participants as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | micrometre (μm) | | Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 44 and Week 48 in Overall ITT Population | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 44 and Week 48 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36 in Treatment-naïve Participants | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Treatment naïve ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids treatment-naïve as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36 in Previously Treated Participants | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Previously treated ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids previously treated participants as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline Averaged Over Week 32 and Week 36 in Overall ITT Population | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 32 and Week 36 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Treatment-naïve Participants | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Treatment naïve ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids treatment-naïve as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Previously Treated Participants | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Previously treated ITT population included all randomized participants who were IVT anti-VEGF or periocular/IVT corticosteroids previously treated participants as defined in the exclusion criteria 9 and 10 in the protocol. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Averaged Over Week 20 and Week 24 in Overall ITT Population | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Week 20 and Week 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST Over Time in Overall ITT Population | CST was defined as the mean thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithelial over the 1 mm central subfield. CST was measured using SD-OCT. Negative change from baseline values denotes improvement. This analysis used an MMRM model. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Error | μm | | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Absence of DME Over Time in Overall ITT Population | Absence of DME was defined as CST < 325 μm for Spectralis SD-OCT, or < 315 μm for Cirrus SD-OCT or Topcon SD-OCT. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) Over Time in Overall ITT Population | The absence of IRF in the study eye (defined as IRF absent or definite outside center subfield only) was assessed by the central reading center using SD-OCT. The percentage of participants with absence of IRF at foveal center are reported. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Over Time in Overall ITT Population | The absence of SRF in the study eye (defined as SRF absent or definite outside center subfield only) was assessed by the central reading center using SD-OCT. The percentage of participants with absence of SRF at the foveal center are reported. Percentages have been rounded off. | Overall ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm A: Vamikibart + Ranibizumab | Participants received vamikibart, 1 mg as IVT injection, Q4W in combination with ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as IVT injection, Q4W up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. | | OG001 | Arm B: Ranibizumab | Participants received ranibizumab, 0.5 mg as an IVT injection, Q4W in combination with sham treatment up to Week 44 followed by an observational period up to Week 72. |
| |