Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research | OTHER |
| Parkinson's UK | OTHER |
| CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of up to 2 mg/day (1 mg BID) of NLX-112 versus placebo in patients with moderate to severe L-DOPA induced dyskinesia (LID) in Parkinson's disease (PD). NLX-112 will be up-titrated to either 2 mg/day or to the highest well-tolerated dose less than 2 mg/day over 4 weeks, maintained at the well-tolerated dose for an additional 2 weeks, and then down-titrated over 2 weeks.
This is a two-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of up to 2 mg/day of NLX 112 versus placebo in patients with moderate to severe L-DOPA induced dyskinesia (LID) in Parkinson's disease (PD). NLX-112 will be up-titrated to either 2 mg/day (1 mg BID) or to the highest well-tolerated dose less than 2 mg/day over 4 weeks, maintained at the well-tolerated dose for an additional 2 weeks, and then down-titrated over 2 weeks.
Patients will report to the study clinic for a screening visit (Visit 1), followed by a baseline visit on Day 1 (Visit 2) where patients will be randomized and begin treatment. Two remote safety visits over telephone (Days 7 and 49 [Visit 3 and Visit 8]) will be conducted. Once treatment has commenced, there will be 2 in-person safety visits to the clinic (Days 14 and 21 [Visit 4 and Visit 5]), 2 in-person efficacy visits to the clinic (Days 28 and 42 [Visit 6 and Visit 7]) and one follow-up in person final safety visit (Day 70 [Visit 9]). In total, patients will report to the clinic for 7 in-person visits. Patients entering the study will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (16:8 patients) to receive either NLX 112 or placebo.
At Visits 2, 6 and 7, efficacy assessments will start 30 minutes after the patient has taken 150% of his or her regular L-DOPA dose, when the patient is ON and experiencing typical dyskinesia.
A PD Home Dyskinesia Diary (electronic) will be completed by the patients and/or caregiver with concordance in ON time with dyskinesia between study staff and patient. Two consecutive 24-hour diaries will be completed prior to randomization (baseline, Visit 2) and prior to the clinic visits on Days 28 and 42 (Visits 6 and 7).
A wearable dyskinesia assessment device will be used to monitor dyskinesias during a 2-day period prior to the baseline visit (Day 1, Visit 2) and a 2-day period prior to the clinic visits on Days 28 and 42 (Visits 6 and 7, respectively).
Blood will be collected for possible NLX-112 plasma concentration measurements on Days 14, 21, 28, 42 and 70 (Visits 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLX-112 | Experimental | Patients will self-administer NLX-112 2 times each day, once in the morning and once in the evening. Up-titration over 4 weeks, maximal dose of 2 mg/day during 2 weeks, down-titration over 2 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Patients will self-administer placebo 2 times each day, once in the morning and once in the evening. Up-titration of number of tablets over 4 weeks, number of tablets equivalent to maximal dose of 2 mg/day NLX-112 during 2 weeks, down-titration over 2 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLX-112 | Drug | NLX-112 will be supplied as tablets containing 0.25 mg NLX-112. NLX-112 is a structurally novel centrally acting, high-efficacy selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist with nanomolar affinity for 5-HT1A receptors. Proposed as a treatment for L-DOPA-induced-dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | Number of patients with Adverse events (AEs) divided into categories of severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5 following the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0) and assessed relationship to IMP (unlikely, possibly or probably related). AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit. | AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit. Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks. |
| Number of Participants With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Number of patients with clinically significant changes from baseline in Electrocardiogram (Rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT, QTcB, and QTcF). Any abnormalities were specified and documented as either clinically significant or not clinically significant. | Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 4 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 14), Visit 5 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 21), Visit 6 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 28), Visit 7 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 42) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
| Number of Patients With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs | Number of patients with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs (Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), Heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature). Any vital signs outside the normal ranges at each site were judged as either not clinically significant or clinically significant by the clinician. | Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 4 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 14), Visit 5 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 21), Visit 6 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 28), Visit 7 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 42) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
| Number of Patients With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Safety Laboratory Parameters | Number of patients with clinically significant changes from baseline in safety laboratory parameters. Any lab values outside the normal ranges at each site were judged as not clinically significant or clinically significant. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at the Final Efficacy Clinic Visit (Day 42), After a 150% L-dopa Dose Challenge, in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) Total Score - Change From Baseline | The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a rating instrument designed to assess the core features of dyskinesia in Parkinson´s Disease. The UDysRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UDysRS was scored from 0 to 4, with a possible maximum total score sum of 104 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. The UDysRS Parts 3 and 4 were repeated 3 times after each L-dopa challenge, and the timepoint with the worst outcome was used to calculate total score sum |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Females of non-childbearing potential are defined as pre-menopausal females who are sterilised (tubal ligation or permanent bilateral occlusion of fallopian tubes); or females who have undergone hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or post-menopausal defined as 12 months of amenorrhea (in questionable cases a blood sample with detection of follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] 25-140 IE/L is confirmatory).
Male patients must be either vasectomised, consent to use condom or practice sexual abstinence to prevent pregnancy and drug exposure of a partner and refrain from donating sperm from the date of dosing until 3 months after dosing with the IMP. Their female partner of child-bearing potential must use highly effective contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1% to prevent pregnancy (see above) during the same period.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Newman-Tancredi, PhD | Neurolixis SAS | Study Director |
| Per Svenningsson, Professor | ASC Torsplan | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sahlgrenska Hospital | Gothenburg | 413 45 | Sweden | |||
| Skåne University Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 35 patients were screened and 27 were randomized and dosed in the study. Eighteen patients were allocated to treatment with NLX-112 and 9 were allocated to placebo. Twenty-three patients, 15 on NLX-112 and 8 on placebo, completed the study.
Potential participants in the study were identified according to the routines of the clinical study sites.
Patients were recruited at 5 clinical sites, with a planned average of 4 to 6 patients per site.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | NLX-112 | Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received NLX-112 oral tablets, uptitrated over 4 weeks to a maximal daily dose of 2 mg for 14 days given as 1mg two times a day. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received placebo. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | NLX-112 | Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received NLX-112. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received placebo. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | Number of patients with Adverse events (AEs) divided into categories of severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5 following the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0) and assessed relationship to IMP (unlikely, possibly or probably related). AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit. Through study completion, an average of 10 weeks. |
|
AEs (including SAEs) were collected from the start of IMP administration (Visit 2) until the end-of-study visit (Visit 9), approximately 70 days.
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0 [24]. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | NLX-112 | Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received NLX-112. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Newman-Tancredi, PhD, DSc, CEO | Neurolixis | (+33) 605 14 09 64 | contact@neurolixis.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 7, 2022 | Oct 18, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 20, 2023 | Apr 10, 2024 | SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004409 | Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced |
| D020820 | Dyskinesias |
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C473959 | befiradol |
| C514026 | PHA-568487E |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo will be matching tablets (identical weight, shape and color) without NLX-112. |
|
| Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 4 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 14), Visit 5 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 21), Visit 6 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 28), Visit 7 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 42) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
| Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examinations | Number of patients with clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination investigated by general appearance, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck, skin, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, abdominal system, and nervous system. Any abnormalities were specified and documented as either clinically significant or not clinically significant. | Visit 1 (Screening) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
| Number of Patients With Suicidal Ideation/Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | Number of patients with change from baseline in suicidal ideation/behavior as assessed by C-SSRS questionnaire with no total score summation. The scale contains 6 "yes" or "no" questions in which respondents were asked to indicate whether they have experienced several thoughts or feelings relating to suicide over the past 3 months and behavior over their lifetime using a baseline scale at visit 1 and any cahnges since last visit using a follow-up scale at subsequent visits. Each question addresses a different component of the respondent's suicide ideation severity and behavior. Q1: wish to be dead, Q2: non-specific suicidal thoughts, Q3-5: more specific suicidal thoughts and intent to act, Q6: suicidal behavior over the respondent's lifetime and past 3 months or since last visit for visits after the visit 1. | The baseline scale was used at screening (Visit 1) and the follow-up scale at all subsequent visits (Visit 2, 4-7, 9) |
| At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), and Day 42 (Visits 7) |
| Change From Baseline in UDysRS Total Score at Day 28, After a 150% L-DOPA Dose Challenge - Change From Baseline | The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a rating instrument designed to assess the core features of dyskinesia in Parkinson´s Disease. The UDysRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UDysRS was scored from 0 to 4, with a possible maximum total score sum of 104 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. The UDysRS Parts 3 and 4 were repeated 3 times after each L-dopa challenge, and the timepoint with the worst outcome was used to calculate total score sum | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2) and Day 28 (Visits 6) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Objective Score (Parts 3, 4) of the UDysRS at Day 28 and Day 42, After a 150% L-DOPA Dose Challenge - Change From Baseline | The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a rating instrument designed to assess the core features of dyskinesia in Parkinson´s Disease. The UDysRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UDysRS was scored from 0 to 4, with a possible total score sum for parts 3 and 4 of 44, where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. The UDysRS Parts 3 and 4 were repeated 3 times after each levodopa challenge, and the timepoint with the worst outcome was used to calculate total score sum. | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), Day 28 and Day 42 (Visits 6 and 7) |
| Change From Baseline in ON Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia (ON Without Dyskinesia Plus ON With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia) Based on a PD Home Dyskinesia Diary - Change From Baseline | A PD Home Dyskinesia Diary (electronic) as completed by the patient and/or caregiver with concordance in ON time with dyskinesia between study staff and patient. The diary was integrated in the Kinesia 360 wearable dyskinesia assessment system and was based on the PD Home Diary developed by Hauser et al 2004. The diary was used to score 5 different conditions in 30-minute time intervals during 2x24 hours prior to Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 6 (Titration) and Visit 7 (Steady state):
Presented as the ratio of ON Time without troublesome dyskinesia (the sum of the time in ON without dyskinesia together with the time in ON with non-troublesome dyskinesia) compared with the total awake time (ON and OFF). | Baseline - prior to Day 1 (Visit 2), Titration - prior to Day 28 (Visit 6), and Steady state prior to Day 42 (Visit 7). |
| Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Scores (Part III, Motor Examination) - Change From Baseline | The UPDRS is one of the most widely-used rating scales employed in the assessment of PD. The UPDRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UPDRS was scored from 0 to 4 (7 items in Part IV was scored 0 to 1), and the individual scores were summed to give a total score that indicates the severity of the disease, with a score of 0 indicating no disability and a score of 199 being the most severe (indicating total disability). Total score sum for Part III alone is 108. | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), Day 28 (Visit 6), Day 42 (Visit 7) and Day 70 (Visit 9). |
| Change From Baseline in UPDRS Combined Scores (Parts I, II, III and IV) - Change From Baseline | The UPDRS is one of the most widely-used rating scales employed in the assessment of PD. The UPDRS consists of 4 parts: Part I assesses non-motor experiences of daily living, such as cognitive impairment and depressed mood (4 items). Part II assesses motor experiences of daily living, such as speech and eating tasks (13 items). Part III is a motor examination conducted by the clinician, including assessments of symptoms such as rigidity and tremor (27 items). Part IV is an assessment of motor complications, such as time spent with dyskinesia and functional impact of dyskinesias (11 items). Each item in the UPDRS was scored from 0 to 4 (7 items in Part IV was scored 0 to 1), and the individual scores were summed to give a total score that indicates the severity of the disease, with a score of 0 indicating no disability and a score of 199 being the most severe (indicating total disability). | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), Day 28 (Visit 6), Day 42 (Visit 7) and Day 70 (Visit 9). |
| Number of Patients in Each Category of Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) in Overall PD Symptoms | The CGI-C is a clinician-oriented scale that assesses the total improvement in the patient's condition relative to the clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) scale conducted at baseline. 1 - Normal not ill, 2 - Borderline ill, 3 - Mildly ill, 4 - Moderately ill, 5 - Markedly ill, 6- Severely ill, 7 - Among the most extremely ill patients The CGI-C rates the patient's condition from 1 to 7: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse | Clinician rated the patient´s global condition using CGI-S at baseline (Day 1, Visit 2) and CGI-C at Day 28 (Visit 6) and Day 42 (Visit 7). |
| Change From Baseline in Dyskinesia Scores Measured by the Kinesia 360 (Great Lakes Neurotechnologies, Inc) Wearable Dyskinesia Assessment System - Absolute Change From Baseline | The Kinesia 360 (Great Lakes Neurotechnologies, Inc) wearable dyskinesia assessment system was used to monitor dyskinesias. Sensors worn on the wrist and ankle combined with a mobile application continuously record data for assessment dyskinesia. Algorithms were used to detect symptoms from the motion sensors data and calculate a severity score (0 to 1 where score 0 corresponds to no dyskinesia and score 1 corresponds to dyskinesia) every 2 minutes. Wearable data collection of dyskinesia took place during a 2-day period prior to Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 6 (Titration) and Visit 7 (Steady state). Outcome is presented as the mean ratio at baseline and absolute ratio change from baseline. | Baseline - prior to Day 1 (Visit 2), Titration - prior to Day 28 (Visit 6), and Steady state prior to Day 42 (Visit 7). |
| Lund |
| 221 85 |
| Sweden |
| ASC Torsplan | Stockholm | 113 65 | Sweden |
| Karolinska University Hospital, Solna | Stockholm | 171 76 | Sweden |
| CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (CTC) | Uppsala | 752 37 | Sweden |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received placebo. |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Number of patients with clinically significant changes from baseline in Electrocardiogram (Rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT, QTcB, and QTcF). Any abnormalities were specified and documented as either clinically significant or not clinically significant. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 4 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 14), Visit 5 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 21), Visit 6 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 28), Visit 7 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 42) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Patients With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs | Number of patients with clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs (Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), Heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature). Any vital signs outside the normal ranges at each site were judged as either not clinically significant or clinically significant by the clinician. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 4 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 14), Visit 5 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 21), Visit 6 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 28), Visit 7 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 42) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Patients With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Safety Laboratory Parameters | Number of patients with clinically significant changes from baseline in safety laboratory parameters. Any lab values outside the normal ranges at each site were judged as not clinically significant or clinically significant. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Baseline, Day 1), Visit 4 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 14), Visit 5 (Clinic Safety Visit, Day 21), Visit 6 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 28), Visit 7 (Clinic Efficacy Visit, Day 42) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examinations | Number of patients with clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination investigated by general appearance, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck, skin, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, abdominal system, and nervous system. Any abnormalities were specified and documented as either clinically significant or not clinically significant. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 1 (Screening) and Visit 9 (Follow-up Clinic Visit, Day 70). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Patients With Suicidal Ideation/Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) | Number of patients with change from baseline in suicidal ideation/behavior as assessed by C-SSRS questionnaire with no total score summation. The scale contains 6 "yes" or "no" questions in which respondents were asked to indicate whether they have experienced several thoughts or feelings relating to suicide over the past 3 months and behavior over their lifetime using a baseline scale at visit 1 and any cahnges since last visit using a follow-up scale at subsequent visits. Each question addresses a different component of the respondent's suicide ideation severity and behavior. Q1: wish to be dead, Q2: non-specific suicidal thoughts, Q3-5: more specific suicidal thoughts and intent to act, Q6: suicidal behavior over the respondent's lifetime and past 3 months or since last visit for visits after the visit 1. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | The baseline scale was used at screening (Visit 1) and the follow-up scale at all subsequent visits (Visit 2, 4-7, 9) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline at the Final Efficacy Clinic Visit (Day 42), After a 150% L-dopa Dose Challenge, in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) Total Score - Change From Baseline | The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a rating instrument designed to assess the core features of dyskinesia in Parkinson´s Disease. The UDysRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UDysRS was scored from 0 to 4, with a possible maximum total score sum of 104 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. The UDysRS Parts 3 and 4 were repeated 3 times after each L-dopa challenge, and the timepoint with the worst outcome was used to calculate total score sum | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), and Day 42 (Visits 7) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in UDysRS Total Score at Day 28, After a 150% L-DOPA Dose Challenge - Change From Baseline | The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a rating instrument designed to assess the core features of dyskinesia in Parkinson´s Disease. The UDysRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UDysRS was scored from 0 to 4, with a possible maximum total score sum of 104 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. The UDysRS Parts 3 and 4 were repeated 3 times after each L-dopa challenge, and the timepoint with the worst outcome was used to calculate total score sum | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2) and Day 28 (Visits 6) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Objective Score (Parts 3, 4) of the UDysRS at Day 28 and Day 42, After a 150% L-DOPA Dose Challenge - Change From Baseline | The Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) is a rating instrument designed to assess the core features of dyskinesia in Parkinson´s Disease. The UDysRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UDysRS was scored from 0 to 4, with a possible total score sum for parts 3 and 4 of 44, where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. The UDysRS Parts 3 and 4 were repeated 3 times after each levodopa challenge, and the timepoint with the worst outcome was used to calculate total score sum. | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), Day 28 and Day 42 (Visits 6 and 7) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in ON Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia (ON Without Dyskinesia Plus ON With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia) Based on a PD Home Dyskinesia Diary - Change From Baseline | A PD Home Dyskinesia Diary (electronic) as completed by the patient and/or caregiver with concordance in ON time with dyskinesia between study staff and patient. The diary was integrated in the Kinesia 360 wearable dyskinesia assessment system and was based on the PD Home Diary developed by Hauser et al 2004. The diary was used to score 5 different conditions in 30-minute time intervals during 2x24 hours prior to Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 6 (Titration) and Visit 7 (Steady state):
Presented as the ratio of ON Time without troublesome dyskinesia (the sum of the time in ON without dyskinesia together with the time in ON with non-troublesome dyskinesia) compared with the total awake time (ON and OFF). | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ratio time | Baseline - prior to Day 1 (Visit 2), Titration - prior to Day 28 (Visit 6), and Steady state prior to Day 42 (Visit 7). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Scores (Part III, Motor Examination) - Change From Baseline | The UPDRS is one of the most widely-used rating scales employed in the assessment of PD. The UPDRS consists of 4 parts:
Each item in the UPDRS was scored from 0 to 4 (7 items in Part IV was scored 0 to 1), and the individual scores were summed to give a total score that indicates the severity of the disease, with a score of 0 indicating no disability and a score of 199 being the most severe (indicating total disability). Total score sum for Part III alone is 108. | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), Day 28 (Visit 6), Day 42 (Visit 7) and Day 70 (Visit 9). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in UPDRS Combined Scores (Parts I, II, III and IV) - Change From Baseline | The UPDRS is one of the most widely-used rating scales employed in the assessment of PD. The UPDRS consists of 4 parts: Part I assesses non-motor experiences of daily living, such as cognitive impairment and depressed mood (4 items). Part II assesses motor experiences of daily living, such as speech and eating tasks (13 items). Part III is a motor examination conducted by the clinician, including assessments of symptoms such as rigidity and tremor (27 items). Part IV is an assessment of motor complications, such as time spent with dyskinesia and functional impact of dyskinesias (11 items). Each item in the UPDRS was scored from 0 to 4 (7 items in Part IV was scored 0 to 1), and the individual scores were summed to give a total score that indicates the severity of the disease, with a score of 0 indicating no disability and a score of 199 being the most severe (indicating total disability). | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At baseline (Day 1, Visit 2), Day 28 (Visit 6), Day 42 (Visit 7) and Day 70 (Visit 9). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Patients in Each Category of Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) in Overall PD Symptoms | The CGI-C is a clinician-oriented scale that assesses the total improvement in the patient's condition relative to the clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) scale conducted at baseline. 1 - Normal not ill, 2 - Borderline ill, 3 - Mildly ill, 4 - Moderately ill, 5 - Markedly ill, 6- Severely ill, 7 - Among the most extremely ill patients The CGI-C rates the patient's condition from 1 to 7: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Clinician rated the patient´s global condition using CGI-S at baseline (Day 1, Visit 2) and CGI-C at Day 28 (Visit 6) and Day 42 (Visit 7). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Dyskinesia Scores Measured by the Kinesia 360 (Great Lakes Neurotechnologies, Inc) Wearable Dyskinesia Assessment System - Absolute Change From Baseline | The Kinesia 360 (Great Lakes Neurotechnologies, Inc) wearable dyskinesia assessment system was used to monitor dyskinesias. Sensors worn on the wrist and ankle combined with a mobile application continuously record data for assessment dyskinesia. Algorithms were used to detect symptoms from the motion sensors data and calculate a severity score (0 to 1 where score 0 corresponds to no dyskinesia and score 1 corresponds to dyskinesia) every 2 minutes. Wearable data collection of dyskinesia took place during a 2-day period prior to Visit 2 (Baseline), Visit 6 (Titration) and Visit 7 (Steady state). Outcome is presented as the mean ratio at baseline and absolute ratio change from baseline. | Per protocol analysis set (one patient excluded in placebo arm due to major protocol deviation). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline - prior to Day 1 (Visit 2), Titration - prior to Day 28 (Visit 6), and Steady state prior to Day 42 (Visit 7). |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 16 |
| 18 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Patients were randomized to receive either active treatment with NLX-112 or placebo. This arm represents the patients that received placebo. | 0 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| Dyskinesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| On and off phenomenon | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Parkinsonism | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Parosmia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Restless legs syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Taste disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Apathy | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dissociation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hallucination | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Illusion | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Irritability | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sleep disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stress | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oral pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Condition aggravated | General disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Orthostatic hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Systolic hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Binocular eye movement disorder | Eye disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema of eyelid | Eye disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye pain | Eye disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Swelling of eyelid | Eye disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Incorrect dose administered | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lip injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Product communication issue | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Micturition urgency | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Inflammatory marker increased | Investigations | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cataract operation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 24.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D020258 | Neurotoxicity Syndromes |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D064420 | Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D011041 | Poisoning |
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
Linear mixed model (LMM) of change from baseline with treatment, visit and the interaction treatment*visit as fixed categorical effects and subject within treatment as a random effect. The baseline value of the dependent variable has been included in the model as a continuous covariate. Kenward-Roger's improved approximation for degrees of freedom (2009) has been used. |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.6886 |
| Other |
Linear mixed model (LMM) of change from baseline with treatment, visit and the interaction treatment*visit as fixed categorical effects and subject within treatment as a random effect. The baseline value of the dependent variable has been included in the model as a continuous covariate. Kenward-Roger's improved approximation for degrees of freedom (2009) has been used. |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.7953 |
| Other |
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit |
|
| Titration |
|
|
| Steady-State |
|
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit |
|
| Visit 9 Follow-up Clinic Visit |
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit |
|
| Visit 9 Follow-up Clinic Visit |
|
| Visit 2 Baseline - Markedly ill |
|
| Visit 2 Baseline - Severely ill |
|
| Visit 6 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Much improved |
|
| Visit 6 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Minimally improved |
|
| Visit 6 Clinic Efficacy Visit - No change |
|
| Visit 6 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Minimally worse |
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Very much improved |
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Much improved |
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Minimally improved |
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit - No change |
|
| Visit 7 Clinic Efficacy Visit - Minimally worse |
|
| Titration |
|
|
| Steady-State |
|
|