Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ineffective enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Teleflex | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Demonstrate the safety of MANTA Vascular Closure Device (VCD) ultrasound (U/S) guided closure in patients undergoing elective TAVR procedures with planned percutaneous femoral arterial access.
The MANTA Vascular Closure Device is indicated for closure of femoral arterial access sites while reducing time to hemostasis following the use of 10-20F devices or sheaths (12-25F OD) in endovascular catheterization procedures.
This study is being conducted to demonstrate the safety of U/S guided closure with MANTA VCD following TAVR procedures utilizing large bore sheaths.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Closure | Experimental | Open label, single arm study using ultrasound guidance during MANTA device deployment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANTA Vascular Closure Device | Device | Evaluate the safety of ultrasound guided deployment of MANTA VCD. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Any Large Bore Access-site Related VARC-2 Major Vascular Complication | adapted from VARC-2 Criteria | within 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Hemostasis | The elapsed time between VCD deployment and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis. | During the procedure |
| Number of Patients With Technical Success | Percutaneous vascular closure is obtained without the use of unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Wood | Vancouver General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Vijay Iyer | University at Buffalo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States | ||
| Henry Ford |
The data obtained will be used, without mentioning Subject PHI, to assess the results of the research, and the data could be used in the future with regard to this study or other studies. The data can be passed on to the health authorities for the purposes of registering the medical device.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
one subject was treated by a physician who was not officially trained and signed off on the protocol or device.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ultrasound Closure | Open label, single arm study using ultrasound guidance during MANTA device deployment. MANTA Vascular Closure Device: Evaluate the safety of ultrasound guided deployment of MANTA VCD. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ultrasound Closure | Open label, single arm study using ultrasound guidance during MANTA device deployment. MANTA Vascular Closure Device: Evaluate the safety of ultrasound guided deployment of MANTA VCD. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rate of Any Large Bore Access-site Related VARC-2 Major Vascular Complication | adapted from VARC-2 Criteria | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | within 30 days |
|
|
Index procedure up to 30 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ultrasound Closure | Open label, single arm study using ultrasound guidance during MANTA device deployment. MANTA Vascular Closure Device: Evaluate the safety of ultrasound guided deployment of MANTA VCD. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Site Hematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
The Prospective Multicenter MANTA™ Vascular Closure Device Ultrasound Guided Closure Study (ST-3370) was terminated early primarily for business reasons. The sponsor recognized that the conditions for widespread adoption of ultrasound-based MANTA deployment do not presently exist. As a result of this finding and the likelihood that the study would not provide sufficient data to support a future labeling change, the sponsor decided to terminate the study.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darra Bigelow, Sr. Manager, Clinical Operations | Essential Medical LLC (a subsidary of Teleflex, Inc.) | 610-331-7299 | darra.bigelow@teleflex.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 3, 2022 | Jun 8, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 2, 2022 | Jun 8, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
None (Open Label)
Not provided
| within 30 days |
| Number of Subjects With Ambulation Success | If a previously ambulatory patient (until day of TAVI) is able to ambulate for at least 20 feet/6 meters without re-bleeding. | During procedure admission |
| Time to Ambulation | The elapsed time between VCD deployment and when ambulation is achieved. | During procedure admission |
| Treatment Success | Time to Hemostasis ≤10 minutes and no VACR-2 Major complications | within 30 days |
| Procedure Time | Elapsed time from initial skin break to time when the post-deployment angiogram is completed. | During the procedure |
| Rate of Any Large Bore Access-site Related VARC-2 Minor Vascular Complication | adapted from VARC-2 Criteria | within 30 days |
| Detroit |
| Michigan |
| 48202 |
| United States |
| University of Buffalo | Buffalo | New York | 14203 | United States |
| Baylor Scott & White | Round Rock | Texas | 78665 | United States |
| Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center | Woodbridge | Virginia | 22191 | United States |
| Vancouver General Health | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Hemostasis | The elapsed time between VCD deployment and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Minutes | During the procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Patients With Technical Success | Percutaneous vascular closure is obtained without the use of unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | within 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Ambulation Success | If a previously ambulatory patient (until day of TAVI) is able to ambulate for at least 20 feet/6 meters without re-bleeding. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | During procedure admission |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Ambulation | The elapsed time between VCD deployment and when ambulation is achieved. | Posted | Median | Full Range | hours | During procedure admission |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Treatment Success | Time to Hemostasis ≤10 minutes and no VACR-2 Major complications | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | within 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Procedure Time | Elapsed time from initial skin break to time when the post-deployment angiogram is completed. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | During the procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rate of Any Large Bore Access-site Related VARC-2 Minor Vascular Complication | adapted from VARC-2 Criteria | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | within 30 days |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 2 |
| 17 |
| 4 |
| 17 |
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Systemic Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vessel Dissection | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema in left hand | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Retroperitoneal Bleed | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided