Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In high-volume trauma centers, multi-slice CT scanners have become the routine imaging modality for screening trauma patients due to their speed and accuracy. In trauma patients with no known neurologic deficits, diagnostic CT is often obtained though it remains unclear whether this affects management of the patient [1]. With the growing cost of health care, a careful look at the benefit and cost of CT is needed to determine how to best utilize this modality in the evaluation of trauma patients.
HYPOTHESIS: In trauma patients with absence of neurologic defects, the addition of comprehensive CT does not change overall clinical management.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to determine the benefit of the CT scan in the clinical management or outcomes of the trauma patients with no neurologic deficits.
Primary Outcome: Percentage of trauma patients with no known neurologic deficits who underwent a CT, any clinically impactful CT findings.
Secondary Outcome: Percentage of benefits CT provides in clinical features, clinical outcomes, injury severity score, GCS, age, sex, ethnicity, cause of injury, mechanism of injury, hospital length of stay, operative vs. non-operative, discharge disposition, radilogy, pathology results and images, any additional morbidities, total cost, 30-day readmission rate, and morality. And when operation does occur, the types of operation and the resulting cost and length of stay.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan-Computer Tomography | Procedure | trauma centers use the pan-computed tomography (CT) scan (head, neck, chest, and abdomen/pelvis) for the evaluation of blunt trauma. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of trauma patients with no known neurologic deficits who underwent a CT | the benefit of pan-CT with no neurologic deficits | April 2006 - April 2016 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of benefits CT provides in clinical features | Clinical outcomes, injury severity score, GCS, age, sex, ethnicity, cause of injury, mechanism of injury, hospital length of stay, operative vs non-operative | April 2006 - April 2016 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Any patients that are pregnant or breastfeeding
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All trauma patients from Methodist Health System.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Amos, MD | Methodist Health System | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75203 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided