Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| St. James Hospital | UNKNOWN |
| Tallaght University Hospital | OTHER |
| Waterford University Hospital | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Many individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) experience symptoms of pain and fatigue which interfere with work. Over 50% of people with IA report workplace difficulties resulting in sick leave, absenteeism and reduced productivity. Loss of ability to continue paid employment results in physical, emotional and financial hardship for individuals with IA and has societal and economic implications. Previous research has identified pain and fatigue as dominant symptoms that interfere with work capacity and therefore interventions are required to reduce the impact of these symptoms on work activities. The purpose of this study therefore is to test the effectiveness of a 4-week Fatigue and Activity Management Education for Work intervention. The study will use a mixed methods design. A randomized control trial will test the effectiveness of the intervention and a qualitative process evaluation with explore acceptability and participants' experiences of the intervention. Individuals with IA, of working age, will be recruited in Rheumatology outpatient departments of three hospitals. Study participants will be randomly assigned to a four-week online self-management intervention or a self-guided symptom management workbook. Study measures consist of self-report questionnaires related to work and symptom management. All participants will also be invited to an interview to discuss their experience of participating in the study.
Rheumatic diseases (RD) include over 100 different types of arthritis, the most frequently occurring being Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Scleroderma, Systemic Lupus erythmatosus and ankylsoing Spondylitis. However, Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) are one of the most common causes of work disability and despite improvements in medical management of IA, up to 50% of people with IA report workplace difficulties resulting in sick leave, absenteeism and reduced productivity.
This study builds on existing research investigating the impact of IA on work performance of individuals. These earlier studies examined how symptoms of fatigue, pain and stress impact on work capacity of individuals with IA. Based on the findings of these studies a self-management program, FAtigue Management Education for Work (FAME-W) was designed to reduce the impact of fatigue, pain and stress on work performance of individuals with IA. Pilot testing of FAME-W, with a non-experimental design, showed improvements in fatigue, work performance, pain and mood following participation in FAME-W. The proposed study will build on this research by testing the effectiveness of FAME-W as a work-focused self-management intervention to increase work performance of individuals with IA.
Project Design and Methodology
Study Aim
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness and acceptability of FAME-W to manage the physical, mental and social demands of work of individuals with IA.
Study Objectives
Study Design
The study methodology will follow the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for evaluating complex interventions. A complex intervention consists of a number of interacting components such as those included in the FAME-W intervention. The MRC framework recommends collecting quantitative and qualitative data when evaluating complex interventions. This study will therefore use a sequential exploratory mixed methods design.
The quantitative phase will be a pragmatic randomized control trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of FAME-W as a work focused self-management intervention to improve individuals' ability to manage their work demands. The CONSORT guidelines for the design and reporting of RCTs will be used at all stages from recruitment, randomization, data collection, analysis and reporting. For the purposes of the proposed study, participants will be randomly allocated to either the group based FAME-W intervention or to a handbook only group. Participants randomized to the group-based FAME-W group will attend an online four-week FAME-W program. The participants in handbook only group will be given a self-guided FAME-W handbook.
The qualitative phase will use a Qualitative Descriptive (QD) design to explore participants' experiences and acceptability of FAME-W. QD is frequently used in health research to evaluate the acceptability and sustainability of health-related interventions. It is considered an appropriate methodology for needs assessments and for informing the planning and delivery of clinical interventions.
Sample Size
Based on the previous studies the individual scores for Work Role Functioning (WRF) questionnaire this study is powered for an effect size of 0.7. To detect an 0.7, 100 participants are required (50 for the group intervention and 50 for handbook only group) to show significance at 5% level, 80% power. Participants will be recruited in groups of 12-14 and then allocated to the intervention or control group using random allocation software.
Data collection methods
Quantitative Data:
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS, outlined below) will be used to collect quantitative data
Qualitative phase: Qualitative data will be collected from individual interviews and focus groups.
Data collection will be carried out immediately before FAME-W commences, immediately following completion of FAME-W, and 3 months following completion of the program.
Data analysis Quantitative data: Baseline characteristics will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. Multilevel linear regression will be used to examine differences between groups for the primary and secondary outcome measures. Statistical significance at p<0.05 will be assumed throughout.
Qualitative data: Semi-structured interviews will be audio-taped and transcribed. Data analysis will be guided by Braun and Clarke's seven stage thematic analysis of qualitative data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: FAME-W intervention | Experimental | Four-week self-management education programme |
|
| Arm 2: FAME-W handbook | Active Comparator | Self-guided FAME-W handbook |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAME-W self-management intervention | Behavioral | FAME-W is an occupational therapy led, four-week group based self-management intervention. It focuses on providing people with IA skills and confidence to manage demands of their employment and daily life through education on IA, self-management techniques, managing symptoms of fatigue, pain and stress and managing physical and mental health. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Work Role Functioning Questionnaire | Work Role Functioning questionnaire is a 27-self-report questionnaire that measures an individual's ability to meet demands of five categories of work: scheduling, output, psychical, mental and social demands. All 27 items are scored on a five point scale, with a score of four given for the response 'difficult none of the time' and a score of zero representing 'difficult all of the time'. Each of the five sub-scales are scored separately. A score is established by adding the response of each item, calculating the average and multiplying this by 25 to achieve an overall percentage. The overall percent can range from 0% (difficult all of the time), to 100% (never difficult) meeting the demands of the job. | Three months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Euro QoL 5 Dimensions -5 levels (5D-5L) | Euro QoL 5 Dimensions -5 levels scale evaluates the health-related quality of life and compromises two components: a health descriptive component and a visual analog scale (VAS) . It has five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each category is scored from 1 (no problem) to 5 (extreme problems). Scores range from 1-25. Higher scores represent higher levels of difficulty. A visual analogue scale measures self-perception of health-related quality of life on a scale of 0-100. Higher scores represent better levels of health-related quality of life. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deirdre Connolly, PhD | Contact | +35318963216 | connoldm@tcd.ie |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Deirdre Connolly, PhD | University of Dublin, Trinity College | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity College Dublin | Recruiting | Dublin | Leinster | D08 EF20 | Ireland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37937322 | Derived | Karkon S, Bennett KE, O'Shea F, Doran M, Connolly D. Testing the effectiveness of a Fatigue and Activity Management Education for Work (FAME-W) intervention for individuals with inflammatory arthritis: Study protocol for a randomized control trial. Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Dec;21(4):1629-1638. doi: 10.1002/msc.1839. Epub 2023 Nov 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymized individual participant data may be shared for results presented in publications of quantitative data on request to the study contact person.
Data will be available for six months following related publications
Requests for data sharing can be made to the study central contact person via email.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| FAME-W Handbook | Behavioral | Individuals in this arm receive a self-guided FAME-W handbook containing the same information as that covered in the four week FAME-W program |
|
| Three months |
| Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory | Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory evaluates five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. It is a 20-item self-report questionnaire scored from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate higher levels of fatigue | Three months |
| Arthritis Work Spillover | Arthritis Work Spillover is designed to assess the extent to which the demands of arthritis interfere with work performance and the extent to which work interferes with managing arthritis. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale where 1= strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Scores range from 6 - 30. Higher scores indicate higher level of interference between work and arthritis | Three months |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) | This scale is a self-report measure with two sub scales for measuring anxiety and depression. Each scale contains seven items and ranges from a score of 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety and depression. | Three months |
| The Stanford Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form | The Stanford Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form is a self-administered, 20-item disease-specific questionnaire suitable for all types of arthritis. It consists of three sub scales: physical function, other symptoms, and pain.Each item is scored between one (very uncertain) and 10 (very certain) with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-efficacy. | Three months |
| The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale | The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale was developed to measure the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of individuals with arthritis. It consists of five domains: physical functioning, symptoms, mood/affect, social interaction, and work-role components. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate poorer overall health. | Three months |
| The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire | The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire was developed to measure pain in adults with chronic pain, including individuals with rheumatic conditions. Scores range from zero to 10 with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain intensity | Three months |