Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Stollery Children's Hospital | OTHER |
| Children's Hospital of Western Ontario | OTHER |
| The Hospital for Sick Children | OTHER |
| Alberta Children's Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of allergy that rapidly affects multiple body systems and can be deadly. The highest incidence of anaphylaxis is in children and adolescents. In Canada, approximately every 10 minutes there is an Emergency Department (ED) visit for food allergy, and up to 80% of anaphylactic reactions in children are triggered by food. The ambiguity in how physicians manage anaphylaxis adds a huge burden to health care and further contributes to ED crowding. Current Canadian and international treatment guidelines universally recommend that all patients present to the ED for a prolonged period (6-24 hours) of in-hospital monitoring after initial reactions have been treated, to increase detection of biphasic anaphylaxis (BA). BA is a second wave of symptoms after initial resolution. These guidelines are based on poor or little evidence and have unintended negative impacts on patient safety and quality of life. Furthermore, this 'one-size fits all' approach to care leads to wasteful resource utilization that provides low value care.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the study is to derive a clinical prediction rule that identifies children with anaphylaxis who are at risk of BA.
METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study will enroll 1682 patients from 7 pediatric EDs that are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) network. We will enroll patients < 18 years of age presenting to the ED with an allergic reaction that matches the diagnostic criteria of anaphylaxis. Research assistants (RA) present in the ED will screen, obtain consent, and prospectively collect all study data. The Research Assistant or Research Nurse will follow patients during their ED visit and ascertain, in conjunction with the medical team, if the patient developed biphasic anaphylaxis in the ED. A standardized follow-up survey conducted within 2-5 days of ED or hospital discharge will determine if a biphasic reaction occurred following ED disposition. We established an advisory council comprised of end-users and community partners external to the project team to monitor project milestones.
STUDY TEAM: We have established an international multidisciplinary team of experts in pediatrics, emergency medicine, allergy/immunology, research methodology and statistics, and knowledge translation. Our team is supported by the PERC network.
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Providing the best evidence-based, value care at the lowest cost is a moral and ethical imperative. Therefore, in alignment with national and international research priorities, we propose to develop a robust prediction model for BA. This model will address a significant gap in current knowledge and practice, with anticipated benefit for patient care and health system efficiency worldwide. This trial will generate novel, clinically relevant data on optimal ED management of children with anaphylaxis that integrates best value care with patient safety.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children with Anaphylaxis | Patients under 18 years of age presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with an allergic reaction that matches diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observational | Other | Not applicable - observational study |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of biphasic anaphylaxis | The primary outcome for this prospective cohort study of children who present to ED with anaphylaxis is the development of biphasic anaphylaxis (BA) in the ED or after hospital/ED discharge. As per the published consensus definition in 2019, to be classified as BA, an anaphylactic reaction must meet 3 criteria: 1) initial anaphylactic reaction followed by resolution of all initial manifestations for ≥1 h, with no new symptoms or treatment administered in that time; 2) the second phase of new or recurrent symptoms or signs that meet the consensus definition of anaphylaxis, and 3) the new or recurrent symptoms or signs are not caused by antigen re-exposure. This definition focuses on clinically important or major biphasic reactions. Mild symptoms that involve only the skin (e.g. urticarial rash) without any other systems involvement will be captured and classified as minor biphasic responses. However, these minor responses do not meet our case definition for BA. | Up to 5 days post enrollment |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients under the age of 18 who present to the Emergency Department with an allergic reaction that matches diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Waleed Alqurashi, MD | Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Principal Investigator |
| Amy C Plint, MD | Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Principal Investigator |
| Marcus S Shaker, MD | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberta Children's Hospital | Calgary | Alberta | T3B 6A8 | Canada | ||
| Stollery Children's Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36316072 | Background | Alqurashi W, Shaker M, Wells GA, Collins GS, Greenhawt M, Curran JA, Zemek R, Schuh S, Ellis A, Gerdts J, Kreviazuk C, Dixon A, Eltorki M, Freedman SB, Gravel J, Poonai N, Worm M, Plint AC. Canadian Anaphylaxis Network-Predicting Recurrence after Emergency Presentation for Allergic REaction (CAN-PREPARE): a prospective, cohort study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e061976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061976. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study Protocol Publication | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000707 | Anaphylaxis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057832 | Watchful Waiting |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017063 | Outcome Assessment, Health Care |
| D010043 | Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| McMaster University | OTHER |
| CHU Ste-Justine, Montreal | UNKNOWN |
| Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Edmonton |
| Alberta |
| T6G 2C8 |
| Canada |
| McMaster University | Hamilton | Ontario | L8S 4L8 | Canada |
| Children's Hospital of Western Ontario | London | Ontario | N6A 5W6 | Canada |
| Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H 8L1 | Canada |
| The Hospital for Sick Children | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 1X8 | Canada |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine | Montreal | Quebec | H3T 1C5 | Canada |