Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Albert Einstein College of Medicine | OTHER |
| Emory University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The overall aim of this study is to assess different external diameters of intravaginal rings (IVRs) for adherence, preference, and acceptability. To assess these domains, women in male-partnered relationships will use three different size IVRs.
The study design is a randomized, open-label, parallel group 3-way crossover study comparing adherence, preference and overall acceptability of 3 different-sized placebo IVRs (IVRs A, B and C) in 24 US couples. At enrollment, each couple will be randomly assigned to 1 of 6 sequences of IVR use: A-B-C, A-C-B, B-A-C, B-C-A, C-A-B or C-B-A. Each couple will use each of the 3 IVRs (IVRs A, B and C) for 30 days per IVR, 90 days total. Each couple will participate for approximately 4 months, including screening. After providing written informed consent at screening, females and their male partners will be evaluated against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by providing their medical, contraceptive, and sexual history as well as undergoing a clinical exam. The exam will include a visual inspection of the genitalia (men) and a speculum exam (women). Potential participants will be recruited by Emory University (Atlanta, GA) and Einstein College of Medicine (Bronx, NY) by contacting prior research participants who've consented to be contacted for new studies; advertising; and distribution of flyers in the study communities. All recruitment materials will be approved by the relevant IRBs prior to use. After screening, women will have an additional 4 visits and their male partners will have 1 additional in-person visit for enrollment and 3 remote visits. Before and after using each IVR, women will have a pelvic exam. If women report symptoms during interim visits, they will have a pelvic exam and will restart IVR use based on the clinical judgement of the site investigator. After enrollment, men who report symptoms possibly related to IVR use will be asked to attend the clinic for an examination. Follow-up visits (in-person for women and remote for men) will include counseling on protocol adherence, contraception, HIV risk reduction counseling. Women will be shown how to use the IVR at Visit 1/Enrollment and will be able to practice ring insertion and removal at that first visit. At monthly visits, women will be examined to check that the IVR is in place.
ADHERENCE: The primary adherence measure will be assessed via daily SMS text messages to women in which they will report if the IVR was out of the vagina in the previous 24h and if so, for how long. At monthly visits, women will respond to a computer assisted self-interview (CASI) questionnaire asking them to rate their adherence in terms of how well they feel they adhered to the IVR instructions for use. They will also be asked to report in more detail about expulsions and removals and the context in which those happen; feeling the ring during daily activities and during sex; and any symptoms experienced in the previous month.
PREFERENCE: We will ask women and their male partners to choose the IVR they think they will prefer at baseline -- before using any IVRs -- and then ask them to state their preference after using all 3 IVRs. Preferences at baseline and endline, and between males and females within each couple, will be compared.
ACCEPTABILITY: Acceptability will be assessed via the monthly CASI interviews according to an adapted version of the Merkatz et al IVR acceptability model.
SAFETY: Safety will be assessed by recording AEs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicone IVR 46mm external diameter | Experimental | Non-medicated 46 mm ring. |
|
| Silicone IVR 56mm external diameter | Experimental | Non-medicated 56mm ring. |
|
| Silicone IVR 66mm external diameter | Experimental | Non-medicated 66mm ring. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of ring size on adherence | Device | The study design is a randomized, open-label, parallel group 3-way crossover study comparing adherence, preference and overall acceptability of 3 different-sized placebo IVRs (IVRs A, B and C) in 24 US couples. At enrollment, each couple will be randomly assigned to 1 of 6 sequences of IVR use: A-B-C, A-C-B, B-A-C, B-C-A, C-A-B or C-B-A. Each couple will use each of the 3 IVRs (IVRs A, B and C) for 30 days per IVR, 90 days total. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adherence | To determine which of 3 non-medicated IVRs each used continuously for 30 days yields the highest adherence as measured by the proportion of women who are adherent to instructions for IVR use for each for ~30 days continuously, based on daily text messages | Up to 90 days |
| Preference | To assess which of 3 non-medicated IVRs each used continuously for 30 days is preferred by women and their male partners based on self reported preference by completing a questionnaire during and by the end of the study. Women and male partners will be asked to state their preference for one of the 3 IVRs at the end of the study. | Up to 90 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability | Participants will be asked to respond to a questionnaire measuring domains of acceptability at the end of using each of the 3 IVRs. Acceptability will be measured by the IVR acceptability measurement tool (IAMT). We will also explore the association between demographics, previous contraceptive use, parity, sexual/vaginal practices, and menses on acceptability. We will compare preferences between women and their male partners and we will compare actual preference at the end of the study with assumed preferences at baseline. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Females:
Males:
Exclusion Criteria:
Females:
Males:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara Friedland, MPH | Population Council | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States | ||
| Albert Einstein College of Medicine, |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40211751 | Derived | Gottert A, Friedland BA, Plagianos M, Zieman B, Sales JM, Atrio J, Shetty S, Sant'Anna Marinho C, Roselli N, Merkatz R, Bruce I, Haddad LB. Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Intravaginal Ring Acceptability Scale Among US Women and Their Male Partners. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):144-153. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70009. Epub 2025 Apr 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Feb 15, 2024 | |
| Unrelease | Mar 28, 2024 | |
| Release | Mar 28, 2024 | |
| Reset | Apr 4, 2024 | |
| Release | Apr 5, 2024 | |
| Reset | May 1, 2024 | |
| Release | Aug 13, 2024 | |
| Reset | Sep 4, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024 | Mar 28, 2024 | |||
| Mar 28, 2024 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000163 | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We propose a randomized, open-label, parallel group, 3-way crossover study comparing adherence, preference and overall acceptability of 3 different-sized placebo IVRs (IVRs A, B and C) in 24 couples. At enrollment, each woman will be randomly assigned to 1 of 6 sequences of IVR use (A-B-C, A-C-B, etc.) and will use each of the 3 IVRs (A, B and C) for 30d per IVR (90d total).
Not provided
|
| Up to 90 days |
| Collection of Adverse Events | To evaluate and compare the safety of 3 nonmedicated silicone IVRs each used and continuously for 30 days as measured by the number and percent of participants with AEs and serious AEs. AEs will be summarized overall by severity and by relation to product use. AEs that are potentially related could be abrasion or erythema due to the device. | Up to 90 days |
| Patterns of adherence | To explore patterns of adherence based on frequency of removals and expulsions per IVR and overall; duration of removals and expulsions per IVR and overall; reasons for removals for each IVR and overall; activities associated with expulsions per IVR and overall; and association between demographics and other background characteristics, sexual activity, and menstruation on adherence to each IVR and overall. | 90 days |
| New York |
| New York |
| 10461 |
| United States |
| Apr 4, 2024 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | May 1, 2024 |
| Aug 13, 2024 | Sep 4, 2024 |
| D015229 |
| Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012897 | Slow Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |