Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of IRX-101 Versus 5% Povidone-Iodine as an Ocular Surface Sterilizer
Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of IRX-101 Versus 5% Povidone-Iodine as an Ocular Surface Sterilizer
This is a randomized, double-masked, multicenter, study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IRX-101 versus 5% povidone-iodine (PI) in subjects receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. The study will be conducted in up to 30 centers in the United States (US).
Intravitreal injection therapy (IVT) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents has transformed the treatment landscape of several retinal diseases, including exudative (wet) macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema, and choroidal neovascularization. The most common adverse effects of IVT occur due to the side effects of Povidone-Iodine 5% (PI; brand name: Betadine® 5%; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX), the antiseptic placed on the ocular surface prior to each injection. PI is nearly universally used to prevent ocular infection (endophthalmitis). PI leads to marked corneal epithelial toxicity in humans,6, 7 resulting in debilitating side effects including decreased visual acuity and pain that can last more than 3 days post-IVT. Post-IVT pain is severe enough to require oral analgesics in up to 30% of patients and is a frequent cause of treatment discontinuation. Therefore, there is an unmet need in ophthalmology for a potent ocular antiseptic with a superior safety profile.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: