| Primary | Percent of Quality Metrics Achieved | Documented receipt of high-quality care at the appointment or within 30 days of the appointment. The quality metrics for Lupus and RA include but are not limited to: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) initiation and Folic acid if receiving methotrexate, respectively. These items will be added together to form a score and the number of items completed out of the total will be the primary outcome measure compared across groups. The denominator is the patient-specific quality metrics they are eligible for and the numerator is the number achieved. The final percent ranges from 0-100 (with 100 indicating that 100% of the quality metrics that the patient was eligible for were met). | Patients of providers randomized to Arm 1 or Arm 2, which includes the eligible patients in the chart-review groups, and those who also participated in the audiorecordings and surveys | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent of Quality Metrics Achieved | | 30 days | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm and in the audiorecording/survey arms. | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm and in the audiorecording/survey arms. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG00062.14± 13.46
- OG00154.31± 14.46
|
|
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| | t-test, 2 sided | | <0.001 | | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 7.83 | Standard Error of the Mean | 2.05 | 2-Sided | | | | | | Difference in the mean of percent of quality metrics achieved in the intervention arm minus the control arm. | | Superiority | | |
|
| Secondary | Perception of Patient Centeredness | Differences in perception of patient centeredness comparing the intervention to non-intervention group. Higher scores indicate less patient-centered experiences. 4-point Likert scale, score range from 14-56. | Subset of patients who consented to participate in audiorecordings and returned completed surveys. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | | At time of appointment (baseline) during which audiorecording took place, reflecting the experience at the appointment immediately preceding survey completion. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 1 who enrolled for audiorecordings and completed surveys | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 2 who enrolled in audiorecording and completed surveys |
| |
| Secondary | Patient Satisfaction | Differences in patient satisfaction score, comparing the intervention to non-intervention group. Score range from 20-70. Higher scores indicate greater patient satisfaction. | Subset of patients who consented to participate in audiorecordings and returned completed surveys. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | | At time of appointment (baseline) during which audiorecording took place, reflecting the experience at the appointment immediately preceding survey completion. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 1 who enrolled for audiorecordings and completed surveys | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 2 who enrolled in audiorecording and completed surveys |
| |
| Secondary | Everyday Discrimination Scale | Reflects experiences of everyday discrimination, comparing the intervention to non-intervention group. Score range is 0-40. Higher scores indicate a greater amount of discrimination encountered. | Subset of patients who consented to participate in audiorecordings and returned completed surveys. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | | A time of the appointment when audiorecording took place (baseline) asking patients to describe the degree to which each item occurs in their day-to-day life. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 1 who enrolled for audiorecordings and completed surveys | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 2 who enrolled in audiorecording and completed surveys |
| |
| Secondary | Adherence | Adherence score (for rheumatology medications), comparing the 3-month adherence score to baseline for the intervention to non-intervention group at three months following the encounter date. Score range is 0-100 with zero being the lowest adherence, and 100 being the best. | Subset of patients in the audiorecording/survey arms who returned completed 3 month follow up adherence surveys. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | | 3 months after the start of the intervention | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 1 who enrolled for audiorecordings and completed surveys | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 2 who enrolled in audiorecording and completed surveys |
| |
| Secondary | Provider Communication: Positive Emotion Words | Provider communication will be measured using the recorded transcripts and compared between arms. We compared the mean (SD) of provider positive emotion words expressed during a clinical encounter. Measured only for patients enrolled in the study who had their appointment audiorecorded. | Patients who participated in audiorecordings and had transcripts for analysis. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of words | | One time baseline evaluation from the transcript of the audiorecording of the encounter of the patient with their rheumatologist | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 1 who enrolled for audiorecordings and completed surveys | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 2 who enrolled in audiorecording and completed surveys |
| |
| Secondary | Patient Trust | Patient trust in their providers, comparing the intervention to non-intervention group. Responses are summed (range 5-25) with higher scores indicating more trust. | Subset of patients who consented to participate in audiorecordings and returned completed surveys. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | | One time baseline evaluation after the appointment reflecting experiences at the immediately preceding appointment. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 1 who enrolled for audiorecordings and completed surveys | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers Enrolled for Audiorecording and Surveys | Subset of patients of providers in Arm 2 who enrolled in audiorecording and completed surveys |
| |
| Secondary | Incidence Rate Ratio of Emergency Departments Visits | Comparison of incidence rate of Emergency Department visits between patients of providers in the intervention compared to the control arms. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | number of ED visits | | 6 months following the encounter of interest | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm (which also includes the subarm that had audiorecorded encounters and completed surveys) | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm (which also includes the subarm that had audiorecorded encounters and completed surveys) |
| |
| Secondary | Incidence Rate Ratio of Outpatient Visits. | Comparison of incidence rate of outpatient visits between patients of providers in the intervention compared to the control arms. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of outpatient visits | | 6 months following the encounter of interest | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm (which also includes the subarm that had audiorecorded encounters and completed surveys) | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm (which also includes the subarm that had audiorecorded encounters and completed surveys) |
| |
| Secondary | Incidence Rate Ratio of Hospitalizations | Comparison of incidence rate of hospitalizations between patients of providers in the intervention compared to the control arms. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | number of hospitalizations | | 6 months after physician encounter | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Patients of Arm 1 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm (which also includes the subarm that had audiorecorded encounters and completed surveys) | | OG001 | Patients of Arm 2 Providers | Includes all patients in the chart review arm (which also includes the subarm that had audiorecorded encounters and completed surveys) |
| |
| Secondary | Implicit Association Test (IAT) Scores- Socioeconomic Status Stereotyping | Change in provider IAT scores pre and post intervention. IAT scores range from -1 to 1. A score of 0 indicates no strong implicit bias. A score of 1 is pro-high socioeconomic status bias and a score of -1 is pro-low socioeconomic status bias. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline compared to 6 months after the start of the intervention. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm 1: Individuation Intervention Plus Implicit Bias Education | Rheumatologists who will have 10 patient interactions each (100 patients total) recorded Rheumatologists will watch implicit bias training modules and then will be instructed to incorporate an individuation strategy into each of their clinical encounters. Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the intervention are will be instructed to watch a brief set of freely available educational lessons and then they will meet with study team members to discuss their "individuation" countermeasure intervention. Providers will be given a choice of several individuation-related questions to better understand the unique characteristics of each patient. Once the provider decides on his/her choice phrases, the research team will assist with the development of a smart phrase (also called "dot phrase") to allow them to incorporate this into a note. Once a week, providers in the intervention arm will receive an email reminding them to incorporate this question and the documentation into their encounters. Implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the comparator arm will be given the same implicit bias educational modules to complete. | |
|
| Secondary | Implicit Association Test (IAT) Scores- Race Implicit Bias | Change in provider IAT scores pre and post intervention. IAT scores range from -1 to 1. A score of 0 indicates no strong implicit bias. A score of 1 is pro-White bias and a score of -1 is pro-Black bias. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline compared to 6 months after the start of the intervention. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm 1: Individuation Intervention Plus Implicit Bias Education | Rheumatologists who will have 10 patient interactions each (100 patients total) recorded Rheumatologists will watch implicit bias training modules and then will be instructed to incorporate an individuation strategy into each of their clinical encounters. Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the intervention are will be instructed to watch a brief set of freely available educational lessons and then they will meet with study team members to discuss their "individuation" countermeasure intervention. Providers will be given a choice of several individuation-related questions to better understand the unique characteristics of each patient. Once the provider decides on his/her choice phrases, the research team will assist with the development of a smart phrase (also called "dot phrase") to allow them to incorporate this into a note. Once a week, providers in the intervention arm will receive an email reminding them to incorporate this question and the documentation into their encounters. Implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the comparator arm will be given the same implicit bias educational modules to complete. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Implicit Association Test (IAT) Scores- Race Stereotyping. | Change in provider IAT scores pre and post intervention. IAT scores range from -1 to 1. A score of 0 indicates no strong implicit bias. A score of 1 is pro-White stereotyping and a score of -1 is pro-Black stereotyping. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline compared to 6 months after the start of the intervention. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm 1: Individuation Intervention Plus Implicit Bias Education | Rheumatologists who will have 10 patient interactions each (100 patients total) recorded Rheumatologists will watch implicit bias training modules and then will be instructed to incorporate an individuation strategy into each of their clinical encounters. Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the intervention are will be instructed to watch a brief set of freely available educational lessons and then they will meet with study team members to discuss their "individuation" countermeasure intervention. Providers will be given a choice of several individuation-related questions to better understand the unique characteristics of each patient. Once the provider decides on his/her choice phrases, the research team will assist with the development of a smart phrase (also called "dot phrase") to allow them to incorporate this into a note. Once a week, providers in the intervention arm will receive an email reminding them to incorporate this question and the documentation into their encounters. Implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the comparator arm will be given the same implicit bias educational modules to complete. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Implicit Association Test (IAT) Scores- Socioeconomic Status Bias | . Change in provider IAT scores pre and post intervention. IAT scores range from -1 to 1. A score of 0 indicates no strong implicit bias. A score of 1 is pro-high socioeconomic status bias and a score of -1 is pro-low socioeconomic status bias. | | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | | Baseline compared to 6 months after the start of the intervention. | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Arm 1: Individuation Intervention Plus Implicit Bias Education | Rheumatologists who will have 10 patient interactions each (100 patients total) recorded Rheumatologists will watch implicit bias training modules and then will be instructed to incorporate an individuation strategy into each of their clinical encounters. Individuation Intervention plus implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the intervention are will be instructed to watch a brief set of freely available educational lessons and then they will meet with study team members to discuss their "individuation" countermeasure intervention. Providers will be given a choice of several individuation-related questions to better understand the unique characteristics of each patient. Once the provider decides on his/her choice phrases, the research team will assist with the development of a smart phrase (also called "dot phrase") to allow them to incorporate this into a note. Once a week, providers in the intervention arm will receive an email reminding them to incorporate this question and the documentation into their encounters. Implicit bias educational modules: Providers in the comparator arm will be given the same implicit bias educational modules to complete. | |
|