Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In recent years there has been an increase in interest from surgeons in the use of synthetic bone graft substitutes to avoid the need of sourcing allograft or iliac crest autograft for use in spinal fusion procedures. This will be an open label, prospective, first in man, single-centre clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of Osteo3 ZP Putty synthetic bone graft in TLIF procedures with instrumented PLF. Safety and performance data obtained in this clinical study will be used to estimate clinical success rates achieved with the use of Osteo3 ZP Putty synthetic bone graft in TLIF procedures. No comparative control group is intended.
The study is expected to run for approximately three years with each subject being followed up for a two- year post-operative period. The target is to recruit approximately 17 subjects to this clinical study, allowing for some subject attrition to get 15 evaluable.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject group | Experimental | undergoing instrumented TLIF with instrumented PLF using investigational product as synthetic bone graft |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osteo3 ZP Putty | Device | Transforminal Interbody Fusion at one spinal level (L2-S1) with instrumented posteriorlateral fusion on at least the contralateral side to the TLIF approach. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety: Incidence of device-related serious adverse events | Incidence of device-related serious adverse events. Success measured as no treatment-related events occurring in 24 months post-surgery. | 24 months |
| Percentage of subjects with evidence of interbody fusion being achieved in 12 months post-surgery | Percentage of subjects with evidence of interbody fusion being achieved in 12 months post-surgery. Assessed as any evidence of bridging bone observed joining the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. Scored using a simple scoring of yes, no or not known if cannot be seen. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire to assess Quality of life | Validated off-the-shelf questionnaire asking patients questions about their ability to perform basic life tasks. It will be used to assess both the subject's back pain and how that pain affects the subject's ability to manage in everyday life. The questionnaire is divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section contains six statements and each statement describes a greater degree of difficulty in that activity than the preceding statement. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The scores for all sections are added together, giving a possible score of 50. The total is doubled and expressed as a percentage. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
DDD defined as one or more of the following: instability as defined by greater than or equal to 3 mm translation or greater than or equal to 5 degrees angulation, decreased disc height, on average by greater than or equal to 2 mm, but dependent upon the spinal level, scarring/thickening of ligamentum flavum or annulus fibrosis, herniated nucleus pulposus or vacuum phenomenon.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter P Varga, MD | National Spine Centrer, Buda Health Center, Budapest | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buda Health Center, Királyhágó u. 1-3. | Budapest | 1126 | Hungary |
There is not a plan to make IPD available
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055959 | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration |
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
40-65-year-old adults requiring one level instrumented spine fusion
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Visual Analog Score to measure pain | Subject will score their pain from 0 to 100 by making a mark on a 10cm line where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable. The change in score from baseline (pre-surgical score) will be assessed at the time points below and reported as a percentage change. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| SF-36 short form to assess change in how the subjects back pain has affected their quality of life. | It will be used to assess both the subject's back pain and how that pain affects the subject's ability to manage in everyday life. The questionnaire is divided into eleven sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Subject will score each section and the resulting scores are entered into a validated software evaluation tool which produces a result out of 100, allowing percentage change to be assessed from baseline (pre-surgical) score. Change in score will be assessed at the time points below and reported as a percentage change. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Maintenance or Improvement in Neurological function | The subject will be assessed for neurological function by physical examination. Success = maintenance or improvement in neurological function compared to baseline scores for all Neurological assessments described as separate outcome measures below (Outcome measures 9 - 14 below). Subject will be considered to have clinical success if all neurological outcomes (outcomes 9-14) are maintained or improved from baseline assessments. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Safety: Incidence rate and type of device-related Adverse events | Incidence rate and type of device-related Adverse events (AEs) recorded will be described for the 24 months post surgery period | 24 months |
| Bone Fusion Success | Presence of bone fusion assessed by CT scans at 3, 6 months and 24 months. Scored as yes or no for presence of a bridge of bone between the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. The results will be reported as percentage of subjects fused at the various timepoints below. | 3, 6 and 24 months |
| Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement of sensory response at dermatomal levels operated in each leg when compared to baseline scores | Sensory - Decreased sensation will be assessed by evaluating sensation response (e.g., to pin prick, light touch or vibration) for the involved dermatomal levels. The examination method chosen to make these assessments will be left to the discretion of the Investigator. Sensory function will be scored as 0 = Absent, 1 = Impaired, 2 = Normal | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement in patellar and Achilles deep tendon reflexes in each leg when compared to baseline scores | Reflex - Reflexes of both legs will be evaluated by assessing patellar (knee jerk) and Achilles (ankle jerk) deep tendon reflexes. The Investigator will be asked to indicate whether the knee and ankle reflex response for each leg is normal, decreased, absent or increased. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement of muscle strength at all muscle sites assessed in each leg when compared to baseline scores | Muscle Strength - Muscle strength of both legs will be assessed bilaterally at the following muscle sites: hip flexors (iliopsoas musculature); knee extensors (quadriceps); ankle dorsiflexors (tibialis transforaminal); ankle plantar flexors (gastrocnemius); and long toe extensors (extensor halluces longus) using the following clinical scale. The worst assessment (no evidence of contractility) will be assigned the lowest clinical score 0 out of 5 while full range of motion against gravity, full resistance will be assigned the highest clinical score 5 out of 5. The following scale will be used to assess muscle strength: No evidence of contractility 0 Slight contractility, no movement 1 Full range of motion, gravity eliminated (passive movement) 2 Full range of motion with gravity 3 Full range of motion against gravity, some resistance 4 Full range of motion against gravity, full resistance 5 | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Neurological outcome - Maintenance of a negative straight leg raising response or improvement of a positive straight leg raising response to negative in each leg when compared to the baseline result. | Straight Leg Raising - The ability of the subject to undergo passive straight leg raising manoeuvres while in the supine position will be assessed for both legs. The results will be recorded as a positive or negative straight leg raise (SLR) for each leg. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Neurological outcome - Maintenance of a negative femoral stretch response or improvement of a positive femoral stretch response to negative in each leg when compared to the baseline result | Femoral Stretch - The ability of the subject to undergo passive femoral stretch manoeuvres while lying on one side will be assessed for both legs. The results will be recorded as a positive or negative femoral stretch for each leg. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |
| Absence of Babinski's sign | Presence or absence of Babinski's sign will be recorded. Absence of Babsinki's sign is considered normal and a success. | 3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months) |