Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Oral rehabilitation by dental implants in the severely atrophic maxilla often represents a challenge. To overcome this difficulty, bone augmentation procedures such as sinus augmentation, guided bone regeneration (GBR), or distraction osteogenesis have been used to obtain adequate bone height and width for proper three-dimensional implant placement. To avoid surgical morbidity and shorten treatment length, alternative methods such as short or tilted implants, as well as zygomatic implants (ZIs),have been proposed and have shown promising outcomes.
Placement of dental implants in the pterygo-maxillary region provides adequate posterior bone support for the prosthesis which permits better distribution of masticatory forces without the need of sinus floor augmentation, onlay and inlay grafts, split crest technique, or osteogenic distraction. This allows rehabilitating patients with satisfactory full arch fixed maxillary prosthesis, which is usually spanned from second molar to contralateral second molar tooth.
The purpose of the present study is to compare the Reliability of all on four by 2 zygomatic implants with 2 conventional implant in anterior region versus all on four approach by conventional implant for the rehabilitation of the atrophied maxilla in terms of survival rates and improving the quality of patient's life and involved complication with maxillary sinus.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| zygomatic implant | Experimental | patients receiving 2 zygomatic implants with 2 conventional implant in anterior region |
|
| conventional implant | Active Comparator | patients receiving 4 conventional implant 2 in anterior region and 2 in posterior region with immediate loading |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zygomatic implant | Procedure | 2 zygomatic implants and 2 anterior conventional implant |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| change of function of the masticatory muscles | measuring muscles activtiy of masseter and temporalis muscles by electromyography | baseline & 6 month after the delivery of the prothesis |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant primary stability | The implant initial stability will be directly measured after implant insertion using the resonance frequency analysis technique by osttel device | baseline Immediate after implantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Biologic complication and implant survival rate | Any biological complication as sinusitis, fenestration, orbital insults, failure of the implant, are going to be assessed radiographically by the CBCT | baseline and sixth months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOSTAFA EL MASRY, doctor | Contact | +201221953838 | mostafa.elmasry@hotmail.com | |
| Dalia ab radwan, professor | Contact |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed a. Atef, professor | Cairo University | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42371728 | Derived | Masry ME, Shawky M, Elhabashy H, Kadry W, Moutamed G, Atef M. Comparative Evaluation of All-on-Four Rehabilitation Using Zygomatic and Conventional Implants in Patients With Atrophied Maxilla. J Craniofac Surg. 2026 Jun 29. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000013114. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
data to be shared after publication of the study
after puplication
data will be share upon request from Colleges
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009066 | Mouth, Edentulous |
| D001284 | Atrophy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003226 | Congresses as Topic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009938 | Organizations |
| D004472 | Health Care Economics and Organizations |
Not provided
Not provided
This will be a randomized controlled trial - parallel group with the patients. It is a superiority trial.
study group are 10 patients receiving 2 zygomatic implants with 2 conventional implant in anterior region, while the control group are another 10 patients receiving 4 conventional implant 2 in anterior region and 2 in posterior region with immediate loading.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| conventional implant | Procedure | patients will receive 4 conventional dental implant |
|
|
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |