Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Abbott | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) may be able to treat mechanical pain caused by tissue injury or damage such as trauma or arthritis in addition to pain caused by nerve dysfunction or injury. The purpose of this study is to determine if dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) can effectively treat arthritic pain of the knee.
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a novel form of neuromodulation used to treat chronic neuropathic pain of the groin and lower extremities related to complex regional pain syndrome type I or II (causalgia). DRG-S has shown promise in treating traditionally mixed neuropathic and mechanical pain syndromes such as axial low back pain, suggesting DRG-S may be able to treat mechanical pain in addition to neuropathic pain. Additionally, in a rodent model of osteoarthritis of the knee, DRG-S alleviated pain related behavior in rats.
This open label feasibility study seeks to evaluate if dorsal root ganglion stimulation with Abbott's Proclaim Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulator System can effectively treat osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients with either osteoarthritis of the non-operated knee or osteoarthritis of the surgically repaired knee will be trialed for one week with dorsal root ganglion stimulation to determine if they positively respond with 50% or greater pain relief. For those patients that have a successful trial, they will be implanted with a permanent stimulation device system and followed for one year post implant to measure knee pain, function and disability, and other related outcomes with sustained DRG-S therapy.
Patients will be seen and evaluated prior to DRG-S trial, and for those that receive permanent implants, re-evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after implant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-operated Knee Osteoarthritis | Experimental | DRG-S for knee osteoarthritis patients with no history of knee surgery |
|
| Surgically Repaired Knee Osteoarthritis | Experimental | DRG-S for knee osteoarthritis patients with history of surgical repair of the knee |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation | Device | Stimulation at L2, L3, L4 and S1 spinal levels |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment success rate at 3 months | Percent of DRG-S implanted patients that successfully respond to stimulation therapy as defined by >=50% reduction in reported pain score from baseline | 3 months post-implant |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| VAS pain scores | Patient's pain score using standard 10cm pain scale that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) for knee pain patients |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] | All complications of DRG-S trial, implant, and stimulation therapy will be reported | Up to 12 months post-implant |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Spine and Pain Institute of New York | New York | New York | 10305 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32433276 | Background | Yu G, Segel I, Zhang Z, Hogan QH, Pan B. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Alleviates Pain-related Behaviors in Rats with Nerve Injury and Osteoarthritis. Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug;133(2):408-425. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003348. | |
| Background | Bjerre-Bastos JJ, Bay-Jensen A-C, Karsdal MA, Byrjalsen I, Andersen JR, Riis BJ, et al. Biomarkers of bone and cartilage turnover CTX-I and CTX-II predict total joint replacements in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil [Internet]. 2019;27(2019):S31-2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.046 | ||
| 32680434 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will undergo one week DRG-S trial, and for those that respond as defined by 50% or greater pain relief, proceed to DRG-S permanent device system implant
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
At each study visit, subjects will complete WOMAC survey which assesses pain, stiffness, and function in patients with OA of the knee. |
| 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | At each study visit, subjects will complete EQ-5D survey which assesses health-related quality of life | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Short Form 36 Mental Component Summary (SF-36 MCS) | At each study visit, subjects will complete SF-36 MCS survey which assesses mental health | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Pain Disability Index (PDI) | At each study visit, subjects will complete PDI survey which assesses pain-related disability | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | At each study visit, subjects will complete PDI survey which assesses patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Medication Dosage | Patient's dose of narcotic analgesics measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and non-narcotic analgesics and dosages | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Timed Up and Go (TUG) | Video recordings of motor task exams will be used to measure TUG, a performance-based measure of functional mobility which measures the time for subject to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Knee Range of Motion (ROM) | Video recordings of motor task exams will be used to measure ROM of the index knee | 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months post-implant |
| Serum concentrations of molecular biomarkers | Serum concentrations of molecular biomarkers related to knee OA including but not limited to C-telopeptide of crosslinked collagen type I and type II (CTX-I and CTX-II) | 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-implant |
| Kellgren-Lawrence System for Classification of Osteoarthritis | Radiologic classification of subject's knee x-ray to grade progression/severity of osteoarthritis | 6- and 12-months post-implant |
| Treatment success rate at other post-implant timepoints | Percent of DRG-S implanted patients that successfully respond to stimulation therapy as defined by >=50% reduction in reported pain score from baseline | 1-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-implant |
| Background |
| Convill JG, Tawy GF, Freemont AJ, Biant LC. Clinically Relevant Molecular Biomarkers for Use in Human Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):1511S-1531S. doi: 10.1177/1947603520941239. Epub 2020 Jul 17. |
| 26652477 | Background | Adhikary SD, Liu WM, Memtsoudis SG, Davis CM 3rd, Liu J. Body Mass Index More Than 45 kg/m(2) as a Cutoff Point Is Associated With Dramatically Increased Postoperative Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Nov 10. |
| 28334499 | Background | van Bussel CM, Stronks DL, Huygen FJPM. Dorsal Column Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Confined to the Knee: Patients' Preference Following the Trial Period. Pain Pract. 2018 Jan;18(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/papr.12573. Epub 2017 May 4. |
| 30821901 | Background | Kallewaard JW, Edelbroek C, Terheggen M, Raza A, Geurts JW. A Prospective Study of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Non-Operated Discogenic Low Back Pain. Neuromodulation. 2020 Feb;23(2):196-202. doi: 10.1111/ner.12937. Epub 2019 Mar 1. |
| 28486758 | Background | Huygen F, Liem L, Cusack W, Kramer J. Stimulation of the L2-L3 Dorsal Root Ganglia Induces Effective Pain Relief in the Low Back. Pain Pract. 2018 Feb;18(2):205-213. doi: 10.1111/papr.12591. Epub 2017 Dec 6. |